China Hysteria: Manufactured Threat or Inevitable Rival?

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,612
By Doug Casey
International Man
August 15, 2025


International Man: Recently, we’ve seen the “Yellow Peril” escalate across media and politics. What’s your take on the sentiment towards China?

Doug Casey: There’s always been a fear of China, perhaps starting with the immigration of laborers to California in the 1860s, then Sax Rohmer’s Fu Manchu novels. It’s logical enough. China has always seemed alien to Americans—their language, their script, their clothing style, and their congregating together in Chinatowns. They were painted as inscrutable and devious. Mao’s Communist ideology and the Korean War, which was really a war between the U.S. and China, certainly didn’t help.

Now China’s newfound prosperity is seen as a threat. China, however, isn’t the problem; it’s the U.S. government’s attitude towards China, combined with visible U.S. decline, while China is advancing rapidly on every front. So, the U.S. Government is trying to suppress China and throw up roadblocks to its progress with sanctions and tariffs, while denying it imports and trying to pen it up militarily. As with Russia, the U.S. is provoking them on many fronts.

However, the current U.S. policy is not only doomed to failure, but is actively counterproductive.

International Man: Is China truly an existential threat to the U.S., economically, militarily, or ideologically, or is it just a manufactured enemy?

Doug Casey: China’s huge, with 1.3 billion people. And over the last 40 years, it has advanced from a poverty-stricken, even primitive, country to a very prosperous one. They’ve risen from nowhere to the top rung economically, scientifically, and militarily.

Why? Because Deng Xiaoping radically altered their economic system in 1980, by dumping communism for capitalism, while maintaining the charade that China was still Communist. Although it’s still called Communist China, the country is totally different from what it was in the days of Mao. It’s no longer communist. It’s simply an authoritarian country—not so different from most others in the world at this point. The Communist Party is nothing but a control mechanism, essentially a scam inuring to the sole benefit of its members.

Communism is an economic system where the State owns and controls everything. China is actually a model of state capitalism, also known as fascism, a marriage of the State and corporate interests. The fact is that (this will come as a shock to many) China is more free-market-oriented than most of the world’s countries. That’s certainly true of Europe these days. In fact, the Europeans are even talking about imitating China’s more regressive policies.

Will China keep growing at the rate they have been? It’s possible, but unlikely. For one thing, their government is retreating from the near laissez-faire policies that made them prosperous. For another, the huge savings of the average Chinese have been malinvested by their banks due to political pressures, with potentially catastrophic consequences. For another, their culture appears to have become less hard-working, softer, and more corrupt.

Are they a military threat? They’re approaching parity now, and at the rate they’re accelerating, they could be way ahead in a decade. But that doesn’t mean they’re necessarily a threat. That’s because the days of invading other nations to steal the gold, the artwork, and enslave the population are long gone. That’s apart from the fact that we don’t know what the nature of the next war will be. In other words, it’s foolish of Trump to bankrupt the U.S. on speculative military spending, while provoking the Chinese.

Do they want to start a nuclear war with the U.S.? No, they have nothing to gain from that. Can they invade the U.S.? No, that’s almost impossible to do. The U.S., not China, is the problem. It can see China rising rapidly while it’s declining, and may decide to strike while it still has the balance of power. The U.S. may use the internecine dispute between Beijing and Taipei, which is none of our business, as an excuse for starting a war.

The U.S. government is increasingly bankrupt. War power is built on economic power, and the U.S. government is not only bankrupt but becoming more so with Trump’s 20% increase in military spending. Meanwhile, it’s falling behind China in science and technology, which, like the military, depends on economic strength. I’m afraid the U.S. is like Wylie Coyote, who thinks he’s on firm ground chasing a Chinese Roadrunner, while he’s walking on air.

China is a non-threat. The problem is the U.S. itself; it’s collapsing from within and blaming China for its own problems.

International Man: During the previous Trump presidency, Democrats painted Russia as an omnipresent threat, almost cartoonishly so. Are Republicans now doing the same with China—and if so, why do both parties need an external boogeyman?

Doug Casey: Yes. After Russia, China is the Devil of the Month. Iran, Mexico, India, and maybe Turkey can join the party as needed. It’s starting to look like the U.S. against the rest of the world. It’s not just Trump, with his unpredictable whims and schizophrenic policy decisions. It’s the lack of any moral core in the U.S., which no longer stands for any principles. The U.S. Government is like a rickety, overly complex Rube Goldberg machine. The Deep Staters who control it want to cannibalize its parts as the thing comes unglued.

This is the nature of the State as an entity. The State, government, doesn’t create anything and never has. Its main activity throughout history has been war and conquest. It’s quite correct to say that war is the health of the State.

The kind of people who are drawn to government aren’t noble altruists. They’re mainly interested in building their personal wealth and power. And since the State is their playpen, they naturally want to make it a bigger playpen.

Both the Republican and the Democratic parties are equally guilty, and there’s no longer much difference between them.

What’s true of both parties is that, barring the senility of a Joe or dissipation on the scale of a Hunter, their leaders all become incredibly rich. The Clintons are worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The Obamas are probably worth $100 million. And their minions get even richer on government spending, as do well-positioned foreigners like Zelensky, who’s gone from being a second-rate actor to being a billionaire. As he has his sycophants.

International Man: What’s really going on behind this aggressive posture toward China? Is it trade, currency, tech dominance, or perhaps something deeper—like fear of a multipolar world?

Doug Casey: You might recall that Japan was the bogeyman before China. In the 80s, it seemed like they were going to take over the world. Now, China is being promoted as a dangerous threat. The fact is that they produce loads of consumer goods cheaper and better than in the U.S. The solution is not to bash China, but to free American entrepreneurs the way Deng freed Chinese entrepreneurs.

I don’t see them as a threat. I’d like to see the whole world be as prosperous as China. Will the Chinese currency, the yuan, replace the U.S. dollar? Unlikely. What’s certain is that the dollar is dying. Again, the problem isn’t the Chinese. The dollar needs to be replaced because it’s being inflated out of existence. The dollar, not soybeans or aircraft, is our major export these days. Of course, everyone wants to dump it. Instead of solving the problem, Trump prefers to threaten anybody who wants to dump dollars.

International Man: You’ve spoken about the collapse of empires and the cycles of history. Where are we now, and what role does the China narrative play in the story of America’s decline?

Doug Casey: The best way to avoid what’s known as “the fate of empires” is simply not to become an empire. That’s the real problem. The U.S. has turned from a country whose population was cohesive because they shared principles and traditions, into a multicultural domestic empire. And it’s an international empire too, with approximately 800 military bases in over 100 countries around the world. The U.S. has changed from a loosely governed middle-class republic into an empire with an ever more powerful executive.

And despite what passes for military power, with its gold-plated weapons and 800 bases, the U.S. really doesn’t have any allies. It only has parasitic client states.

None of this is China’s fault. But since the U.S. has become a danger to the rest of the world, you can expect other countries to take advantage of its problems.

Other countries still fear the U.S., but they no longer respect it.




Reprinted with permission from International Man.
 
Literally, all of this country's problems, are due to Washington DC and the foreign State which it answers to.

Not China, Iran, Russia. These nations are simply used to deflect.
 
I'm still waiting for anyone to provide a believable free market explanation on how the free market can revive the manufacturing industry in the US.

Given China's economic advantage they have built in terms of its network of suppliers, logistics, customers, and servicers, how can American manufacturing companies expect to compete without some kind of state support/intervention?

The honest answer is probably "they can't", but that's not acceptable from a national security standpoint, if not also from an economic standpoint.

The only person here who I recall even attempted to provide an explanation is @acptulsa who's explanation is basically that repealing regulations can overcome what he believes are the "small" economic advantages that China has built. Well, having suppliers, logistics, customers, and servicers for your factory is not a "small" advantage - it's pretty much a mandatory prerequisite to being able to compete. You can repeal as many regulations as you want but unless you have suppliers, logistics, customers, and servicers, your factory isn't going to be profitable without some kind of state support.
 
China's economy is doing terrible.

They don't have a consumer culture and their government cannot get people to spend money because they dont have social security.

Their economy is completely dependent on exports and other countries are moving away from imports with China because they keep stealing intellectual property and using trade as a weapon.

Plus they started bullying neighboring countries in the region and threatening them with their "wolf warrior diplomacy"
 
I'm still waiting for anyone to provide a believable free market explanation on how the free market can revive the manufacturing industry in the US.

Given China's economic advantage they have built in terms of its network of suppliers, logistics, customers, and servicers, how can American manufacturing companies expect to compete without some kind of state support/intervention?

The honest answer is probably "they can't", but that's not acceptable from a national security standpoint, if not also from an economic standpoint.

The only person here who I recall even attempted to provide an explanation is @acptulsa who's explanation is basically that repealing regulations can overcome what he believes are the "small" economic advantages that China has built. Well, having suppliers, logistics, customers, and servicers for your factory is not a "small" advantage - it's pretty much a mandatory prerequisite to being able to compete. You can repeal as many regulations as you want but unless you have suppliers, logistics, customers, and servicers, your factory isn't going to be profitable without some kind of state support.

Domestic manufacturing has already started happening. They just can't compete with China's government subsidized manufacturing.

Some of the stuff they have already moved away from China because they force you to transfer your technology to them and they don't let you take any money out of China.

The real solution would be for China to have social security so that they can have a consumer culture.

They dont trust their government to do social security though so they save their money and they dont spend it because otherwise when they are old and cant work their kids will just kill them off.

Whats even worse is that the one child policy has created a demographics problem and their population is collapsing because of this and since they have no consumer culture people can't get jobs because there is no consumers to create the jobs.
 
Good summary of the current state of Chinese economy. (The TLDR/TLDW - China's manufacturing industry continues to grow, at the expense of their debt, and to the detriment of their service sectors)

 
Oh ya. So terrible. Like, the worst ever. I can't imagine, how bad they are doing right now. Probably super horrible

Their housing sector collapsed and they are cutting everyone's pay and not hiring a lot of people especially young adults.

A lot of people went into debt to buy houses that never got built and wont get built and they still have to make payments on it.

People with the means to leave China have been fleeing the country. Some of them have been stopped at the US border.

Their Younger generation spent all of their money and savings on education and they cant get a job and the schools stopped giving people diplomas unless they get an internship and the internships make them work for free.

Their government's only solution is economic stimulus. They have done several rounds of economic stimulus but their economic growth and their banking system which is dependent on economic growth is dying.
 
Their housing sector collapsed and they are cutting everyone's pay and not hiring a lot of people especially young adults.

A lot of people went into debt to buy houses that never got built and wont get built and they still have to make payments on it.

People with the means to leave China have been fleeing the country. Some of them have been stopped at the US border.

Their Younger generation spent all of their money and savings on education and they cant get a job and the schools stopped giving people diplomas unless they get an internship and the internships make them work for free.

Their government's only solution is economic stimulus. They have done several rounds of economic stimulus but their economic growth and their banking system which is dependent on economic growth is dying.

China's economy isn't perfect by any means but the fundamentals haven't really changed. Their manufacturing industry is still strong and growing. A few bumps along the way such as a housing bubble is expected and not really a big deal. It's still a rapidly growing economy and stuff like that is going to happen.

Ten years from now their economy will have grown substantially and ours will have continued to stagnate.
 
China's economy isn't perfect by any means but the fundamentals haven't really changed. Their manufacturing industry is still strong and growing. A few bumps along the way such as a housing bubble is expected and not really a big deal. It's still a rapidly growing economy and stuff like that is going to happen.

Ten years from now their economy will have grown substantially and ours will have continued to stagnate.
Not really.
Their collapse is snowballing and all their official numbers are fantastical lies. (I know everybody lies but theirs are the worst)
The CCP will not last out Trump's term.
 
Not really.
Their collapse is snowballing and all their official numbers are fantastical lies. (I know everybody lies but theirs are the worst)
The CCP will not last out Trump's term.

They have the means of production and the people to use it, so there's really not any way for that to "collapse".

If the argument is that it'll collapse because they're using it inefficiently, well that argument's bunk, because they've been using it presumably inefficiently for 45+ years now and it's pretty clear that any "inefficiency" hasn't been a significant impediment to their growth.

There is nothing about the fundamentals of their economy that suggests that they won't continue on their current growth trajectory.
 
They have the means of production and the people to use it, so there's really not any way for that to "collapse".

If the argument is that it'll collapse because they're using it inefficiently, well that argument's bunk, because they've been using it presumably inefficiently for 45+ years now and it's pretty clear that any "inefficiency" hasn't been a significant impediment to their growth.

There is nothing about the fundamentals of their economy that suggests that they won't continue on their current growth trajectory.
They are losing the means of production because of mismanagement.
They do not have the people to use it, they've been lying about their population for a long time and they lied about how many they lost to covid.
Their debt is even worse than ours and getting worse faster, and they are losing their overseas customer base because Trump and others are fighting back.
Their growth was all due to theft or the globalists force feeding them, those are coming to an end.
 
They are losing the means of production because of mismanagement.
They do not have the people to use it, they've been lying about their population for a long time and they lied about how many they lost to covid.
Their debt is even worse than ours and getting worse faster, and they are losing their overseas customer base because Trump and others are fighting back.
Their growth was all due to theft or the globalists force feeding them, those are coming to an end.

We'll see I guess. You've been saying China is going to collapse since at least 2018, so maybe the next few years will prove you right.
 
We'll see I guess. You've been saying China is going to collapse since at least 2018, so maybe the next few years will prove you right.

Empires don't collapse over night typically. Look at the Soviet Union for example. Look at the British Empire for example.

Their government's changed and their power and influence is just not what it used to be.

The communist party might not remain in power and the unified China of several dozen ethnicities and several regions might not remain unified. If it does it just won't be powerful like it used to be.

The communist party's right to rule comes from its ability to provide prosperity. Thats where their mandate of heaven comes from.

So a new government is likely that won't happen without a power struggle though.

The communist party has been able to squash political opposition before they can become influential like they did Jack Ma but Beijing has not been able to destroy Taiwan.
 
What is their actual population? A mere 900 million?

Its not about population size its about demographics.

A country without a birth rate at replacement levels can't sustain an empire.

China's birth rates is what people suspect they are lying about.

They have whats called an aging population and this is seen in their schools.

It has been reported that the schools are closing and they are resorting to trying to pay women to have children but they cant afford to take women out of the workforce without their economy slowing down even more and they have so much debt they can't afford to do that.

They tried to enslave other countries in the world with their debt that was propped up by their housing market but their housing market burst.

So they can no longer afford to finance loans to people who can't pay it back without selling their country into slavery to China.
 
Did you read the quote I was replying to there?
I did read what you said and its in line with what many believe. The big drop is from working aged people leaving the country.

It has been argued that they have lied about their birth rates for decades so its likely several hundred million less than official numbers.

Some people have estimated its less than a billion with a large amount of the population being older.

So its declining and its older and its not replacing itself.
Demographics is more than just how many people there are.
 
Back
Top