Chick-fil-A Vandalized in Torrance, CA ("Tastes Like Hate")

Ugh, the horror in those comments. I hate how people defend this as oh so noble when it is on their side, but if the shoe was on the other foot they would scream bloody murder. I have been a strong supporter of gay right, but this makes them look like assholes when they are trying to get people to accept them.

It doesn't make them look like assholes. It exposes who and what they really are.
 
IT WASSOME THING THAT I USED TO BELIEVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I THEN READ SOME OF THE FREAKIN Qu'ran and it was even shittier than the bible. How the hell do i edit.
 
The guy who tagged the Chik Fil A has stepped forward. He's quite proud of himself: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/03/chick-fil-a-graffiti-torrance_n_1738807.html



I
f I had his address, I'd be tempted to go paint "STFU" on his house or his car. It's not much of a crime.

The vandals are wrong. The government officials trying to bar Chick Fil A from opening restaurants are wrong.

For those who oppose Chick Fil A, the right thing to do is just not buy their Filet O' Hate sandwiches.
 
Slavery as God intended is nothing like that of modern day. It was to repay a debt. Once the debt was paid, the "slave" was free. Many chose to stay as they were treated better by their masters than on their own. Much like Israel, once freed and in the wilderness wanting to return to Egypt because they were fed more than manta. As far as "raping his slave" that was not the case at all. Show me where it said she was raped. If anything, she was boastful to Sarah because she was with Abrahams child. Regardless, Abraham and Sarah did not have faith in what God told them that Sarah would bare him a child, were human, sinned daily like the rest of us, and were punished by God for their lack of faith. If you actually studied the bible with a bit of faith, it would be clear as day.

That's interesting, how slavery worked, but are you kidding me? Where did you get that she was boastful to be carrying his child? Hagar ran away because she was upset that Abraham got her pregnant!! She was mad at Sarai for making her have sex with him.

And of course it does not say he raped her, because she was Sarai's slave, so she did not have the right to disagree. She had to have sex with him, like it or not. By today's standards we would call it rape, but at the time Genesis was written, it was not considered rape because she was their property. Hope that makes sense...

Tell me if I'm wrong... She was NOT happy he got her pregnant and ran away, and only went back because the Angel of the Lord appeared to her and told her to go back.

Actually though, the details of that are not what my post was about anyway. Some things in the Bible are simply wrong, and do NOT accurately depict what God wants. Either that, or Christians today are completely ignoring a very substantial portion of God's very specific instructions, while screaming all holy hell about this one issue. It's either one or the other. Those examples I gave are just a few of the things we conveniently ignore today; I can give you a ton more if you'd like. Are they wrong to begin with? Or are we just selectively picking and choosing which parts of the Bible we feel like observing?
 
Yep, lump all them gays in one big group. They are all exactly the same. Maybe I should put up some Fred Phelps videos and talk about the tolerance of Christians.

Fred Phelps is a jewish diamond dealer. He has his own agenda. Ergo what he has to say about shit is not amusing nor cogent in the least. I may as well review Grimm's Fairy Tales. It has better symbolism.

Rev9
 
Gay's can legally get married in a few different states. just went to a wedding in Indiana yesterday, the couple went to iowa for a day to get officially married and then came back and had their ceremony, Indiana has to officially recognize their marriage. :)

You guys are on the wrong side of history get with the times.

History? You mean time local trends. Don't frikkin' kid yourself. This shit is a flash in the pan. Generations make history. Fagdom is a genetic dead end./ Orgasm-orgasm-orgasm-die as opposed to orgasm-orgasm-child-orasm-child orgasm die. Tolerance/ I will offer it when I see it is reciprocal. I take no yard of lip from radical miss thangs. Other than that..if ya wanna go suck a big one then fine..but don't frikkin' tell me. I got food on my stomach. Ya wanna get married..fine..don't expect the frikkin' world to celebrate your teeny weeny peeny got itself a receptacle to slosh about in. We don't care what you got hanging in yer party pants and don't want to know what you like to do with it for shits and giggles. Seriously. it is frikkin' gross. What is so hard to understand about this??

Rev9
 
That's interesting, how slavery worked, but are you kidding me? Where did you get that she was boastful to be carrying his child? Hagar ran away because she was upset that Abraham got her pregnant!! She was mad at Sarai for making her have sex with him.

And of course it does not say he raped her, because she was Sarai's slave, so she did not have the right to disagree. She had to have sex with him, like it or not. By today's standards we would call it rape, but at the time Genesis was written, it was not considered rape because she was their property. Hope that makes sense...

Tell me if I'm wrong... She was NOT happy he got her pregnant and ran away, and only went back because the Angel of the Lord appeared to her and told her to go back.

Actually though, the details of that are not what my post was about anyway. Some things in the Bible are simply wrong, and do NOT accurately depict what God wants. Either that, or Christians today are completely ignoring a very substantial portion of God's very specific instructions, while screaming all holy hell about this one issue. It's either one or the other. Those examples I gave are just a few of the things we conveniently ignore today; I can give you a ton more if you'd like. Are they wrong to begin with? Or are we just selectively picking and choosing which parts of the Bible we feel like observing?

Jesus was the teacher..not Saul nor the wandering tribe. The Universe is the reflection of the teacher. He had a consort. I reject falsehoods and refuse to accept them due to temporal trends which on this planet often do not have the best interests of it's denizens within the methodologies.

Rev9
 
For those who oppose Chick Fil A, the right thing to do is just not buy their Filet O' Hate sandwiches.

And run right down to Gay Bob's Knob who has a dick on a stick sale and shove the daily blow job special combo meal down yer throat. Jeesh..what a bunch of frikkin' maroons and the halfwit bullshit they think passes for cogent points or some kind or argument for or against. I see a whole swath of knee jerk diatribe and good folk getting shuffled down dead end alley debates by gay shillage. If ya don't like something by instinct..trust it and avoid it. If ya wanna do something suffer it. You were the one that wanted to do it. Do not expect the world to applaud your choices just because mommy did or did not hang yer artwork on the fridge. It makes you come off as simply a spoiled brat that never grew up.

Rev9
 
Jesus was the teacher..not Saul nor the wandering tribe. The Universe is the reflection of the teacher. He had a consort. I reject falsehoods and refuse to accept them due to temporal trends which on this planet often do not have the best interests of it's denizens within the methodologies.

Rev9

That's my point. Jesus was the teacher. Not anyone else. If one is a Christian then that means a follower of Christ.

So if someone can just provide me with a chapter and verse showing when Jesus said something about homosexuality or gays while he walked the earth as God Incarnate, then I will concede and happily agree that the proper thing to do as a Christian is to condemn homosexuality as sinful and evil.

It seems like a pretty big omission from God Incarnate for something that's supposedly such a huge abomination unto the Lord... He walked the earth for thirty-some years and said lots of stuff, and yet we have this glaring omission. You'd think in all those years he could've taken thirty seconds to utter one little measly half sentence about it to confirm how evil it is, you know, like the things he said about adultery for example, or lack of faith, or all the other things he did bother to talk about.

To me it kind of indicates God doesn't actually give a damn whether people are gay or straight, if you believe Jesus is God and came to make a new Covenant with man based on Love and Faith, not based on rules and a laundry list of violations. If he did, Jesus sure had plenty of opportunity to say something about it, and he apparently didn't.
 
I don't know about all this marriage stuff, I just don't like the way "Chick-a-fil-a" or whatever is spelled. Never ate there, never will.
 
So if someone can just provide me with a chapter and verse showing when Jesus said something about homosexuality or gays while he walked the earth as God Incarnate, then I will concede and happily agree that the proper thing to do as a Christian is to condemn homosexuality as sinful and evil.

Here is New Testament scripture for you condemning homosexuality as sinful and evil:

Romans 1:26-32
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
 
History? You mean time local trends. Don't frikkin' kid yourself. This shit is a flash in the pan. Generations make history. Fagdom is a genetic dead end./ Orgasm-orgasm-orgasm-die as opposed to orgasm-orgasm-child-orasm-child orgasm die. Tolerance/ I will offer it when I see it is reciprocal. I take no yard of lip from radical miss thangs. Other than that..if ya wanna go suck a big one then fine..but don't frikkin' tell me. I got food on my stomach. Ya wanna get married..fine..don't expect the frikkin' world to celebrate your teeny weeny peeny got itself a receptacle to slosh about in. We don't care what you got hanging in yer party pants and don't want to know what you like to do with it for shits and giggles. Seriously. it is frikkin' gross. What is so hard to understand about this??

Rev9

You may be crude but you're right. Homosexuality is not the future defining blueprint of what it is to be human. Rather it's a genetic anomaly that shouldn't be celebrated. With all that said, the individuals who are homosexual should be treated with some common decency. It wasn't their choice.
 
Last edited:
I was unaware that the bible was a collection of direct quotes. Christians are aware that there was a committee formed to vote on the cannon right, which became the bible? So that means what? Men chose what is to be read in the bible and what is not. As far as Jesus, and this might provoke some into fits of theologic apoplexy, can't his philosophy be summed up in the golden rule? As applied to gay marriage: If you would not like other people telling you who you can marry, you aught not tell others who they can marry... Solution? GET THE F******Mother F******Mother F******Mother F******Mother F****** goverment out of MARRIAGE entirely, forever. The onlything left to do is to establish a baseline for consent, which should have nothing to do with age but with ability to understand consequence - likely administered in the form of a common sense test.

Example question: If you decide to hit a hornets nest with a baseball bat you are likely to get:
a A high five
b Stung, repeatedly
c Hugged
d Married
 
That's my point. Jesus was the teacher. Not anyone else. If one is a Christian then that means a follower of Christ.

So if someone can just provide me with a chapter and verse showing when Jesus said something about homosexuality or gays while he walked the earth as God Incarnate, then I will concede and happily agree that the proper thing to do as a Christian is to condemn homosexuality as sinful and evil.

Here is Jesus talking about homosexuality himself:

Luke 17:28-30

28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;

29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.

30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

The people of Sodom were condemned just like all those that reject Jesus will be condemned.
 
Last edited:
Here is Jesus talking about homosexuality himself:

Luke 17:28-30



The people of Sodom were condemned just like all those that reject Jesus will be condemned.


Also, Matthew 19, directly from Jesus.

4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

Marriage was created for a man and a woman. Not a man and a man or a woman and a woman. Those are not Godly relationships and are wrong and sinful.
 
Last edited:
You may be crude but you're right. Homosexuality is not the future defining blueprint of what it is to be human. Rather it's a genetic anomaly that shouldn't be celebrated. With all that said, the individuals who are homosexual should be treated with some common decency. It wasn't their choice.

Out of curiosity what does everyone think about the 'origins' of homosexuality. I have my opinions, but I'd love to hear someone else's.
 
Here is Jesus talking about homosexuality himself:

Luke 17:28-30
28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;

29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.

30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

The people of Sodom were condemned just like all those that reject Jesus will be condemned.

He didn't say they were having homosexual sex in Sodom. He gives a list of all the fun stuff they were doing, and gay sex acts are not in the list.

Sodom is referenced, but God destroyed the place because Lot couldn't find ten righteous men.

I think referencing the destruction of Sodom as an allegory to those who don't believe in Jesus, while not saying a word about homosexuality and listing all these other things, proves my point more than it does yours. He still didn't say a word about it being wrong.
 
It was an old thing i used to believe, i am just tired of switching things on the internet. I am a Constitutional Conservative- one who believes in the constitution and libertarian ideals, but acts in the way of a conservative. I'm no John Stossel, and a libertarian think tank does not exist (take that david boaz and your cosmo-drinking lady friends(call me Susan!)) I personally find gay people repugnant as i find muslims, christians, Blacks, Hispanics, and people who think medicine is corrupted. But, i don't push my beliefs on them through government force and coercion. That is for me to do in my own personal life.
LOL!
This guy is awesome, please don't ever ban him.
 
Also, Matthew 19, directly from Jesus.

4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

Marriage was created for a man and a woman. Not a man and a man or a woman and a woman. Those are not Godly relationships and are wrong and sinful.

This is Jesus talking about hetero sex and marriage.

Still not Jesus saying homosexuality is a sin or abomination.
 
Back
Top