Chicago teachers to go on strike

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,598
Chicago teachers to go on strike

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57509202/chicago-teachers-to-go-on-strike/

(CBS/AP) CHICAGO — The Chicago Teachers Union announced Sunday night that it will go on strike Monday morning for the first time in 25 years after contract talks with the school district failed over issues including pay, benefits and job security.

"We will be on the (picket) line," Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis said after emerging from all-day talks with district negotiators.

"This is a difficult decision and one we hoped we could have avoided," she said. "We must do things differently in this city if we are to provide our students with the education they so rightfully deserve."

More than 26,000 teachers and support staff are expected to hit the picket lines Monday morning, while the school district and parents carry out plans for keeping nearly 400,000 students safe and occupied during the day in the nation's third largest school district. District officials plan to feed and monitor students at 144 schools throughout the city during the strike.

School board President David Vitale had announced a short time earlier on Sunday night that the talks had broken off, despite the school board offering what he called a fair and responsible contract that would cover four years and meet most of the union's demands. He said the talks with the union had been "extraordinarily difficult."

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel says the strike is unfair to the city's school children.

Speaking shortly after Lewis announced the walkout, Emanuel said the two sides disagreed mainly over two issues that could quickly be finished if the negotiations continued, and that the district's team was ready to start talks again at any time. He said the district had offered the teachers at 16 percent pay raise over four years.

CBS station WBBM in Chicago points out the mayor said he was "disappointed that we have come to this point, given that even all the other parties acknowledge how close we are, because this is a strike of choice. Because of how close we are, it is a strike that is unnecessary."

Lewis said she believed talks would resume Monday but a time had not been set for the sides to meet. She added that progress had been made but not enough to avert a strike.

Union officials said among the outstanding issues were district proposals for standardized student testing that would "cheapen" the school system and a teacher evaluation system that would cost 6,000 teachers their jobs within two years. Lewis said the union had won concessions from the district on other matters.

The walkout was announced after months of tense, at-times heated talks among Emanuel, the school board and union leaders at a time when unions and collective bargaining have come under criticism around the nation during difficult economic times.

The district had been offering a raise of 2 percent a year for four years. The union called that offer unacceptable — particularly after Emanuel last year canceled a previously negotiated 4 percent pay raise, citing budget problems.

The union countered by asking for a 30 percent pay raise over two years, followed by a request for a 25 percent increase over two years. Just weeks ago, Lewis told delegates the union had adjusted its demand and was asking for a 19 percent pay raise in the contract's first year.

The union also has raised concerns about raises based on teacher experience and education. It said the district agreed to retain contract language allowing raises based on experience, called step increases, but would not actually pay the money now.

Teachers also have been concerned about new teacher evaluations, health benefits and regaining lost jobs. An additional issue was how a longer school day for students is being implemented.

The strike is the latest flashpoint in a very public and often contentious battle between the mayor and the union.

When he took office last year, the former White House chief of staff inherited a school district facing a $700 million budget shortfall. Not long after, his administration rescinded 4 percent raises for teachers. He then asked the union to reopen its contract and accept 2 percent pay raises in exchange for lengthening the school day for students by 90 minutes. The union refused.

The longer school day was one of the mayor's campaign promises for the city's schools, and he pushed to have it implemented a year ahead of schedule. He attempted to go around the union by asking teachers at individual schools to waive the contract and add 90 minutes to the day. He halted the effort after being challenged by the union before the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board.

The district and union agreed in July on how to implement the longer school day, striking a deal to hire back 477 teachers who had been laid off rather than pay regular teachers more to work longer hours. That raised hopes the contract dispute would be settled soon, but bargaining continued on the other issues.
 
These local governments shouldn't be taking their crap. They should be focusing on privatizing education and firing these teachers. If they need teachers in the short term hire scabs. Unions shouldn't be allowed to boss around their governments or businesses.
 
The only "winners" here are the kids who don't have to go to these forced attendance indoctrination centers while they are having this strike. I am sure that most of the kids are happy about it.
 
Last edited:
So if they go on strike... How do you suppose they can do less then they already do?
 
The only "winners" here are the kids who don't have to go to these forced attendance indoctrination centers while they are having this strike. I am sure the most of the kids are happy about it.

I'm sure they'll have to attend classes to the middle of July to make up for the missed days i.e. get their government money per slave.

Serious question; why can't they just cancel the union contract and hire private teachers? I realize there are some major political hurdles, but "legally" is there anything preventing a bust of the strike?
 
I personally know MANY teachers. There are the exceptions. The ones that do put in countless extra hours, coach for a couple extra grand a year, and head up clubs which takes up more of their "free" time. I also know teachers who get to the school at 8 a.m. leave at 3:30 p.m. and never set foot in the building at night or on weekends, never go to games or help with clubs/activities sports. These last described are the majority. a 19 percent increase the first year is a slap in the face to every parent who sends their kids to public schools who hasn't had a pay increase in years. Teachers are not special. It's a job. At my university, the education program was the easiest program at the school and some of the people who graduated with teaching degrees were complete idiots.
 
These local governments shouldn't be taking their crap. They should be focusing on privatizing education and firing these teachers. If they need teachers in the short term hire scabs. Unions shouldn't be allowed to boss around their governments or businesses.

That might be what this is about, but it's not a good thing. Arne Duncan is turning the schools over to the corporations, and calling it privatization.
 
Teachers are not special. It's a job. At my university, the education program was the easiest program at the school and some of the people who graduated with teaching degrees were complete idiots.

Actually, teachers are pretty special.

They might have been idiots prior to receiving the degree, but not afterwards. Graduation is one of the civil sacraments. Upon receipt of the sheepskin, the degree holder is mystically transformed into an expert on the subject and cannot be criticized by anyone outside of the field.

Government employment is another civil sacrament. Flawed individuals are mystically cleansed of all ill will. Although they can still make mistakes, they always have our best interests at heart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCE
Chicago has 10% unemployment. I'm sure some of them are looking for teacher jobs.
 
Oh oh, I see an opportunity here to eliminate a huge problem facing IL and their looming state bankruptcy.

In order to eliminate the impossible present and projected costs of benefits including: pensions, healthcare and wages from the taxpayer's backs, they might threaten strikers with immediate termination and loss of all benefits. They'll jut feign concern that other workers may also go on strike to show that they side with the striking teachers. Those workers may include police, fire, sanitation and various powerful trades. The strike may spill over into medical and many government jobs that have also unionized.

What could possibly go wrong?

They'll plead with them to, "just go back to work within 14 days, with a slight temporary pay cut, so we can all continue to work this out".

Of course that will piss 'em off more while they wait for a few more workers to join the strike.

It may get sticky when they then fire all of the striking workers (as planned) and terminate all their future benefits and past contractual promises. They might even lump in past retirees with severe cuts to existing pensions and benefits. If that's not harsh enough already, they would also probably move the game up a notch or two by reminding the fired workers that the taxpayers are already mad as Hell and any violence or interference with restoring order and job functions will be handled as the Chinese government does it...

The shocked local MSM will go along and help them announce, "Jobs jobs, JOBS" to international media outlets aimed at anyone who still wants to come to Illinois in America's midwest for the opportunity to get ahead.

[Come to amerika to get screwed by the elite mobsters that hang out in Illinois.]

They'll need to bring some troops home and invite those looking for some temporary work to consider massive job openings in IL. There will be, of course, mounted machine guns at the ready to disperse protesters. They'll have a special MSM press conference and extend a special thanks to the Chinese government for the inspiration and role model they’ve been. They might mention that they too may be invited to help restore order in IL.

If things get real messy, they might need to call Obama and call in those political favors (that got him elected in the first place) in return for sending the national guard and possibly a few drone air strikes to get all the new slaves working again.

The Volt will be decreed the official car of IL. They will say it’s the perfect car for the masses though only the top government personnel will be able to afford these cars since, of course their wages and benefits will not be cut.

They will install a grid like network of computerized security ID checkpoints to help maintain order with minimal inconvenience. As long as you have a clean record with no infractions, and a government approved job and/or purpose, you’ll have almost nothing to fear.

Illinois, soon to become a great place to work and obey.
 
The only "winners" here are the kids who don't have to go to these forced attendance indoctrination centers while they are having this strike. I am sure the most of the kids are happy about it.
Right but do the math, wait till the kids come back. Who do you suppose is going to be the bad guys?
 
Oh and I want a 16% raise over the next 4 years. Wages/GDP flat for a decade and they're bitching about ONLY 16%?
 
That might be what this is about, but it's not a good thing. Arne Duncan is turning the schools over to the corporations, and calling it privatization.

So you're saying that people shouldn't be allowed to take kids where they want? I'm in favor of the voucher system. Each student should be given $X/yr and the parents can send the kid where ever they feel the kid can do best at. (as long as such school meets some sort of educational standard)
 
So you're saying that people shouldn't be allowed to take kids where they want? I'm in favor of the voucher system. Each student should be given $X/yr and the parents can send the kid where ever they feel the kid can do best at. (as long as such school meets some sort of educational standard)

The problem with vouchers, as I understand them, is that all schools would be required to accept them. Even private schools. And when they did, that would put them under control of federal government dictates.
 
Back
Top