Chelsea Clinton Claims Roe v Wade “Added $3.5 Trillion to Our Economy”

[timosman]

What she is saying is that its ok to kill people if it makes you money. At least that is that argument she is proposing to convince people to be pro-abortion.

This is actually funny as leftist generally oppose making money.

 

[Jan2017]

DISGUSTING

Death is . . . good business for Clintons.

 

[euphemia]

CNS News reports Clinton claimed the infamous U.S. Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade was a good thing... because it led to a $3.5 trillion boost to America’s economy.

Only a woman with no moral basement would ever put a price on a human life.

 

[specsaregood]

Only a woman with no moral basement would ever put a price on a human life.

I wonder how many dollars having legal slavery added to the US economy?

 

[Swordsmyth]

From Jonathan Cahn's book "The Paradigm" Chapter 3: Days of the Gods

That any culture could permit the sacrificing of children is hard to fathom. But that such a thing could be considered a sacred act stretches the limits of comprehension. But this is exactly what took place in the ancient apostasy. Could even this facet of the paradigm correspond to the present day? The priests of Baal were the ones who oversaw and participated in the sacrifice of children. Their modern-day equivalents would be those who oversee the killing of unborn children in abortions. The following is a quote from a woman who literally oversaw the killing of tens of thousands of unborn children, Patricia Waird-Bindle:

“Abortion is a major blessing, and a sacrament in the hands of women . . . ” 1

The link of abortion to paganism, as in the sacrifices of Baal, Molech, Artemis, and the other bloody deities of the ancient world, is made clear in the words of feminist author Ginette Paris. In her book, amazingly titled The Sacrament of Abortion , she writes:

“It is not immoral to choose abortion; it is simply another kind of morality, a pagan one.”

She continues:

“Our culture needs new rituals as well as laws to restore abortion to its sacred dimension . . . ”

So what exactly is the sacred dimension that abortion, the killing of one’s child, once possessed and must now be restored to? Lest the connection remain in any way ambiguous, Paris spells it out:

“Abortion is a sacrifice to Artemis. Abortion [is] a sacrament for the gift of life to remain pure.”

Paris was not alone. Other proponents of abortion have spoken of the act as the sending of the slain child to the mother goddess, connecting abortion to the pagan child sacrifices of ancient times—as in the offerings to Baal. And though many advocates of abortion would never use such terminology, they will unwittingly speak of the practice and the right to perform it as sacred.

When Israel’s children were sacrificed on Baal’s altars, the nation deafened its ears to their cries. But God did not. The blood of the innocent would lead to the nation’s judgment. So in the modern case we have likewise lifted up our children on the altars of our apostasy and have likewise deafened our ears to their cries. But even by the most basic measures of morality, the clear and unavoidable truth remains: the killing of an unborn child, the taking of an innocent life, is as wrong and horrific as any human act could be wrong and horrific. And as in ancient times, no amount of words, legislation, or rulings can alter that fact. That we have sanctioned such a thing or have done and said nothing to oppose it is an indictment not only of our present civilization but of all who have sanctioned it or done and said nothing to oppose it.

For all those who have taken part in this or any act spoken of in this chapter, the love of God is greater than any sin, and His mercy, stronger than any guilt. All who seek His forgiveness will find it.

But as for a civilization that wars against the ways of God, sanctions evil, and sacrifices millions of its children on the altars of its transgressions, it stands as did the ancient kingdom—under the shadow of God’s judgment.

...

 

[euphemia]

I wonder how many dollars having legal slavery added to the US economy?

Let me be a little more clear: Only the most evil person would ever put a dollar value on a human life and promote deliberate death as a means to enrich other human beings.

 

[Origanalist]

Only a woman with no moral basement would ever put a price on a human life.

 

[Jan2017]

DISGUSTING
Is it allowed to throw-up on you now Madeleine (?)

 

[oyarde]

This really shows that she has NO clue of the actual motivations and thought process of many/most of the people that are pro-life. Either that or she is just one sick ghoul.

Considering who raised her I am going with sick ghoul.

 

[oyarde]

I wonder how many dollars having legal slavery added to the US economy?

I am thinking by 1865 it was a loss . Prior to that it mostly encouraged people to dabble in crops that were otherwise unprofitable before modern machinery and would create more poverty later that helped bring about federal welfare programs that are probably responsible for losses in the trillions by now . Slave owners and woman voting pretty much two of the larger catalysts for holding the US back from ever reaching its highest economic potential before the decline .

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

This is what I mean when I say that the problems that face the US and the West are spiritual and not exclusively economic or fiscal. Even if it's true, the transformation of children from a blessing and a privilege to a burden and a "choice" outweigh any alleged economic benefits. Women choosing not to have kids because it will mess up some plan they have to be a corporate drone at some awful conglomerate is NOT a good thing.

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

I'll be honest. I am pretty indifferent on abortion. It can be argued both ways. I am probably pro-choice if for no other reason, I believe it reduces crime. http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/abortion-and-crime-who-should-you-believe/

I don't think Chelsea Clinton's argument about improving the economy is correct, but if it were, I see it as a good argument to make.

Steven Pinker has pretty expertly debunked the claim that abortion reduced crime.

 

[Jan2017]

Jane Doe v Wade . . . oops I mean ROE . . ,.
was an engineered case . . . the lady didn't want this - it was lawyer-induced.

 

[euphemia]

Over 60 million murders since Rove v Wade was decided. I don't see where Clinton is getting $3.5 trillion. She has to be pretty sick to actually doing that kind of math.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Once again a Clinton has no idea what they're talking about.

 

[William Tell]

Disgusting! what a nasty woman.

 

[EBounding]