Cheating in FL straw poll prompts Criminal Complaint

And why, when confronted about the bait and switch tactics by one of their members did Tony say, " Don't create any trouble with this or you will get hurt?"

Friendly and honest Straw poll and fund raiser or deceptive money making scam and crminal threats to cause bodily harm if it wasn't kept hushed up?????

Hi Cindy.. This strongarm mafiosa tactic will be halted. This is unconscionable and anybody saying to not follow up on this as there is not criminal complaint is wrong. This is called making a terroristic threat. It will get you put in jail in a heartbeat at the officers discretion.

Best
Randy
 
Ted Gunderson obviously hates America. Can't we have some sort of vote of our own? A VOTE TO CONTROL THIS LOONATIC TED GUNDERSON! Clearly he should have submitted this plan for our collective forum approval first. I say this shaves at least 1 basis point off our Florida poll numbers, we can't afford not to do what they tell us! That trouble-making lady should have kept her domestic dissident mouth shut. These are exactly the kind of juvenile 5 year old antics that will make us lose! We need to be more tactful. Ted and the troublemaker should have simply found some signs that say, "We wish you wouldn't do this sirs!" and then sat out on a patio discussing them via laptop over the internet.

I only hope we can recover from this blow.

Geezzz, Mark. You had me going there for a sec...;)
 
Hahaha...What an interesting article. I'm bookmarking his website because I can't find Weekly World News anymore. He's also uncovered a homosexual sex-ring in the White House, although folks like L. Craig don't help disprove such insanity.

This was front page news in the Washington Post in the late 80's. There was the Jeff Gannon scandal recently. If yer not paying attention don't open your mouth and look like yer uninformed whilst pretending to a vast array of knowledge.

Thanks
Randy
 
If this guy is an ex FBI investigator, he will know what will and won't fly in a court of Law.

Looks like he is acting independetly.

The meetup members who are also members of the REC, have a legitimate gripe with their own local party members.

They are currently only looking for a Public apology, and the returned funds for unused tickets.

Sounds fair and reasonable enough.

It's not about second place. It is a silly straw poll and that wins you nothing much. Romneys bought win got his name smeared in the local press for what he did. I'll bet he regrets spending $20,000 for bad press now.


Ron Pauls Straw Poll wins have not given him any outstanding Press either. The results are not the issue here.

This is about brave members of local RECs, taking action to clean up the shananigans within their local RECs.

They meet with, deal with and work with these people, on building up the local Republican Party, face to face in rooms every month.

How can they expect to re-build the name of the Republican party when they witness Republicans behaving dishonestly and do nothing about it?

Someone has to stand up and show what an honest republican with integrity looks and acts like. Paul has at the national level and it's time we stand behind him at the local level.

What is so hard to understand about that?

I'm freaking tired of people getting all excited when they see our sign waving, and get curious about Paul, just to see their faces turn sour when they find out he is with the Republican party.

The Republican Party has a bad name right now with the greater public.

People shy away from Republican Ron Paul because they now believe that all Republicans are a bunch of corrupt liars. So when some Decent paul supporters want to work to change that, some of you say, lying is no big deal, move on?

Are you out of your minds? It is a big deal and it's why the Democrats will win in 2008 if we do not take any action showing that not all Republicans are lying, corrupt, greedy power mongering bullies.

It's not okay with some of us and if Paul gets in, we won't tolerate the same sort of corrupt lying and bullying in D.C. either.

We need to get the people to beleive in us, and Paul and what we can do together to clean up government and political corruption, when we join forces and take action.

Not enough members of it, have done enough to clean it up and change it's reputation, through honest actions of integrity. They let it get this bad and it's why we are having a harder time converting Dems, Indies and 3rd people over to the Republican Party to vote for Paul.

I applaud these people for working to create positive change within the Republican party and for even being involved within their REC's. I am behind them 100%!!!!!!!!!!
 
No reason not to try.


At the very least I'd like our money back. I do think they committed fraud.

I'll send my personal info as soon as I find out from the meetup people if this is legit. TY
 
If true, the aggressive threat of bodily harm to the young woman who threatened to expose these deceitful practices, very likely rises to the level of a felony.

It's rising to the level of me taking names afterwards.
 
OMG....are you really serious that a man with the creds Ted Gunderson has is irrelevant because he is a "truther"? Maybe people ought to wonder more about why this brilliant man is a truther instead of having your Pavlovian Dog responses to him being a "truther".

Ted's creds:

Federal Bureau of Investigations

1977-79 Senior Special Agent-in-Charge*

Los Angeles, California

1973-77 Special Agent-in-Charge
Memphis, Tennessee and Dallas, Texas

1973 Chief Inspector

1965-73 Asst Special Agent-in-Charge
New Haven, Connecticut and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

1960-65 Special Agent Supervisor
FBI Headquarters, Washington, D.C.


1951-60 Special Agent

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Prior to retirement in 1979, Ted Gunderson had over 700 persons under his command and operated a $22 million annual budget.


Los Angeles Olympic Committee
Consultant, 1984


California Narcotics Authority
Consultant appointed by Governor Jerry Brown, 1981-82


Pan American Games Security Coordinator
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1979
Special Appointee of US Attorney General Griffin B. Bell


Alumni Highest Effort Award in the Field of Law Enforcement
Sigma Alpha Epsilon, 1977


Law Enforcement Officer of the Year Award
AFL-CIO Metal Trades Council, Los Angeles, California, 1977

Word. QFT +1

Also, The 9/11 Exploratory Citizenry ROCKS!!
 
IMHO.

If you don't go after these bastards, they'll feel free to do it again. And again. And maybe on a larger scale, or in something that really does matter. And it looks like strong arm tactics have worked for this Tony guy before, seeing how that was the first place he went.

This is about sending a message, and the message isn't to the American Public; it's to 'them.' Clean it up or face the wrath. And I'd rather send that message after a rigged straw poll than after a couple thousand Ron Paul supporters were held out of their polling places at a real election site.

Just MHO.
 
There is a video clip of a poll worker being asked what the rules are about voting and if voting multiple times is allowed. She said, " I don't have to answer that, get your camera out of my face"

Anyone have that clip handy?

deceptive money making scam and crminal threats to cause bodily harm if it wasn't kept hushed up?????

This is the one with "bugger off" ~~ only 19 seconds long

The camera person was threatened too.. seems to be a pattern.

Video showing Romney supporters voting multiple times in Tampa Straw Poll, denying it and threatening violence.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=JAcL0v8aphA
 
IMHO.

If you don't go after these bastards, they'll feel free to do it again. And again. And maybe on a larger scale, or in something that really does matter. And it looks like strong arm tactics have worked for this Tony guy before, seeing how that was the first place he went.

This is about sending a message, and the message isn't to the American Public; it's to 'them.' Clean it up or face the wrath. And I'd rather send that message after a rigged straw poll than after a couple thousand Ron Paul supporters were held out of their polling places at a real election site.

Just MHO.

Absolutely right! It ends here!!!
 
OMG....are you really serious that a man with the creds Ted Gunderson has is irrelevant because he is a "truther"? Maybe people ought to wonder more about why this brilliant man is a truther instead of having your Pavlovian Dog responses to him being a "truther".

Confident that someone would eventually spell it out better than I ever could, I sat back trying not to have my eyes roll out of their sockets...

Thank you.
 
well, regardless of what happens i'm sure my old buddy who is currently a hillary campaign staffer in iowa will get a kick out of the videos :)
 
Haa!

Check out this email someone sent meetup about it.

Glock got her back now baby!!!

~~~~~~~~~

I did get her email addy.Thanks to those who replied.

We did get in touch with her, and we at Glock talk have offered her our support

and the free membership at the Gun range.


~~~~~~~

Sweet!!!!
 
Sounds like this guy Ted is waaay out there.

As for a Ron Paul supporter being threatened by this FL REC Chair, it would be up to the RP supporter to file a criminal complaint and it would most likely be a low grade misdemeanor along the lines of harassment or assault (assault is the threat, battery is the physical harm).

As for the "voter fraud" that no doubt ocurred, I don't see criminal charges sticking since it was a straw poll. What could stick is a civil lawsuit for fraud and interference with a contractual relationship against those who voted multiple times and Romney's campaign if it can be proven his campaign planned the multiple voting. You need a damaged party, and that would be all the other campaigns. Thus, it would probably have to be another campaign, and not an individual, that would have to file the lawsuit to make it stick, and it would really look like sour grapes by the campaign that filed the lawsuit over a small straw poll.

With all that being said, I'd say this is all a waste of time unless there is a smoking gun that the Romney campaign endorsed and promoted the multiple voting. That should be exposed as it goes to Romney's character and how it relates to being president. If there is a smoking gun, I'm sure some media outlets would give it time and then Ghoul can use it in a TV ads against Willard.
 
Actually I think that was John DeCamp, Nebraska State Senator. Although John and Ted are very close friends so perhaps they worked on it together. Not sure if you are mocking the so-called homosexual sex-ring but if you are perhaps you should read John DeCamps book on the subject (The Franklin Cover-Up). It's no mocking matter I assure you.

Thanks for the response, and I will definitely look into it. You have to admit, the list of article titles on that site seem, well...sensationalistic. Maybe I've been living in the Matrix too long. But as you're genuine, I will give it a shot. :)
 
This was front page news in the Washington Post in the late 80's. There was the Jeff Gannon scandal recently. If yer not paying attention don't open your mouth and look like yer uninformed whilst pretending to a vast array of knowledge.

Thanks
Randy

Wow, you're a charmer! I'll keep my uninformed and inattentive mouth shut then. :eek:
 
wont this lead to speculation that if Romney is doing it RP must be doing it since he is winning a lot of straw polls?

Just a thought..
 
Well the death threat is DEFINITELY illegal, even if the other stuff isn't. I still think straw polls are on the same level as internet polls.
 
As far as Civil suits go....

I really dont see a cause of action here... the straw poll was private...

For Fraud you must have
1. a false statement or action
2. known to be false, and with intent for others to rely on it
3. the statement was indeed relied on
4. and damages. (this is the element that I think is lacking)

What damages could they claim?

The only potential COA that I can see is the threat to the lady of bodily harm if she went public with the info.

Now, since there was no harmful or offensive contact, there is no battery.

For Assault you need the following elements:
1. an affirmative statement or action
2. that statement or action puts person in immenint apprehension of bodily harm

Now because the lady actually did go public with information, the second element is shot to pieces.. she obviously was not in any immemint apprehension of bodily harm because she went ahead an went public. She didnt believe his statement enough to refrain from doing what he threatened against.

The only other cause of action I can see here is maybe Intentional infliction of emotional distress...

Even though no assault, there can be IIED. If she can prove that his actions were in fact outrageous and reckless to the ordinary person. As if you told another person what happened they would exclaim "outrageous"

I see this as the only COA she has.... Therefore, not really worth suing...


As for Criminal, you must have a higher burden of proof, beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case, you only have to prove a, preponderance of the evidence.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top