Charlottesville Antifa Steamrolled By Car

I can't post the article. I am on my phone, but I am reading an article that says the driver was a Hillary supporter. I don't know if it's true, but I am going to hold my opinions until more comes out. This may be a never ending series of rabbit holes.
 
Where is this video of the driver being attacked by "bat-wielding" anarchists that forces him to hit the gas into a group of protesters?

A better question is what is the media's motivation for keeping the video (actually two) away from your eyes?




 
anyone else think that the guy driving into the crowd looks way older than the accused ?

Yeah, whole thing looks like another orchestrated event designed to elicit an emotional response from low info types. The guys in the still frame look more like military/police than what I would expect, too. That is a good video.

Was there something going on last week about the DNC and DWS?

Nope, not a thing. Why do you ask? ;)
 
I would attack the car/driver if I just witnessed attempted murder, too.
But that last video shows the car/driver was just trying to avoid a violent outcome.

Would you not fear for your life if people were hitting your car with bats?
 
"Excuse me, Mr. Antifa, I don't mean to interrupt your "Down with Nazis! We want socialism!" chant but can you tell me the official name of the Nazi party?"

"Sure, scro, it's the Hitler Party. Professor at the community college told me."

"Riiiiiight. Carry on with your righteous protest."
 
But that last video shows the car/driver was just trying to avoid a violent outcome.

Would you not fear for your life if people were hitting your car with bats?

I'm not seeing where the vehicle was initially being attacked with blunt objects which would theoretically have caused him to "panic." Further, he could have put it in reverse if his intention was getting away rather than ramming into a crowd of people beforehand.
 
So I guess the question is, can he claim that he was traveling at a high rate of speed because because there were people glaring at him menacingly and carrying bats? I think he can. He had just left a rally where people were being assaulted.

He might claim it but from that video it didn't seem the likely reason. At that point where he was still about 100 feet away from the flag guy if he was scared it wouldn't make sense to speed up to a spot where there's way more menacing people. At that point he could've backed up if he was worried. I've done that before. I've taken a wrong turn and wound up on a street that had a crowd up ahead with not so nice people and quickly backed out of there. The last thing you'd do is speed up to the edge of the crowd.
 
It is the logical conclusion of the media and elite's anti-white agenda. Generation Z really has no other option but to embrace White Nationalism. If they don't, they are dead. The time when pure libertarianism was an option has passed. When we failed to elect Ron Paul in 2008 we knew there would be consequences. These are those consequences. The entire right must now put their differences aside to fight and defeat the Far Left. Only then can we get back to arguing about Libertarian Ideals.

If nothing else good comes out of this mess, at least it's drawn out into the open a whole bunch of people who had previously just been dog-whistling into being far more blatant as to their true political beliefs.
 
I can't find that article about him supporting Clinton. I was reading, posting and doing things around the house. I haven't been able to refind it with an internet search. Sorry if I misled anyone.

On another note, the news reports call him by his first, middle and last name, like Lee Harvey Oswald. It seems a lot of controversial people are known by three names. Is that because of the way law enforcement releases the name or is it something else?
 
"Excuse me, Mr. Antifa, I don't mean to interrupt your "Down with Nazis! We want socialism!" chant but can you tell me the official name of the Nazi party?"

"Sure, scro, it's the Hitler Party. Professor at the community college told me."

"Riiiiiight. Carry on with your righteous protest."

I don't suppose the phrase National Socialism means anything to you...

Nah, thought not.
 
If nothing else good comes out of this mess, at least it's drawn out into the open a whole bunch of people who had previously just been dog-whistling into being far more blatant as to their true political beliefs.

Are you seriously, particularly accusing RonPaulMall of subtlety?

I'd say he has every reason to resent that baseless accusation!
 
I can't find that article about him supporting Clinton. I was reading, posting and doing things around the house. I haven't been able to refind it with an internet search. Sorry if I misled anyone.

On another note, the news reports call him by his first, middle and last name, like Lee Harvey Oswald. It seems a lot of controversial people are known by three names. Is that because of the way law enforcement releases the name or is it something else?

Bingo! That was my first thought. James Alex Fields Jr.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to RJB again.
 
Last edited:
Are you seriously, particularly accusing RonPaulMall of subtlety?

I'd say he has every reason to resent that baseless accusation!
Some posters seem to have been surprised by the blatant expression of racial identity politics in the last couple of days. Obviously, the dog whistles and pandering in that direction were less obvious to them than it may have been to others.
 
Back
Top