Charlie Kirk getting destroyed in debates

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
51,901


So Charlie Kirk:

1) Didn't know that "black only dorms" actually allowed anybody, black, white or other, to live there.

2) Didn't know about Linda McMahon enabling paedophobia at the WWE under her watch.

3) Wrongly thought that United Airlines somehow "lowered standards" by setting a goal of 50% black or women pilots. Kirk didn't realize (apparently) that women make up 50% of the U.S. population by themselves. He then pivoted to "Men are more likely to want to be pilots" which showed the stupidity of his argument as it ASSumes the only way to encourage diversity is to lower standards while ignoring the obvious that another way to increase diversity is simply to encourage a more diverse group of applicants to apply.

4) Acted like Pete Hegseth was somehow qualified to be over the Department of Defense just based on how many pushups he could do.

Charlie Kirk was supposed to be this great debater. :rolleyes:
 
Sometimes being a great debater isn't about winning an argument and always being right.

When you argue the "wrong thing" and therefore you are "wrong" it allows people to hear the arguments against what you are saying.

This is why they put people in echo chambers and isolate people from opposing views and its what made Charlie Kirk great because he took the debate to people who would normally be isolated from opposing views.
 
He didn't get destroyed. The only way he got "destroyed" is if someone (e.g., jm) likes to pretend that DEI is magic and fairy tales and creates diversity out of thin air without consequences.
 
He didn't get destroyed. The only way he got "destroyed" is if someone (e.g., jm) likes to pretend that DEI is magic and fairy tales and creates diversity out of thin air without consequences.
The only consequences to the Tuskegee Airmen DEI project a lot more white American bomber pilots and crewmen made it back home to their families and a lot of German interceptor pilots didn't. But I'm sure that's a problem for you. Sieg Heil!

Edit: And I guess you're okay with a paedophile enabler being over the Department Of Education? :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top