Changed Delegate Count in NV per NV GOP

[anaconda]

In RNC rule 38 it says they don't even recognize binding at the RNC, likely because they want all delegates to vote 'the establishment choice' even if the establishment choice lost their state.

Isn't Romney screwed then?

But in any event, that goes with thinking it doesn't mean delegates,

What does it mean if not delegates? Are you talking about binding or maybe something else?

assuming the rules themselves PERMIT delegates to change the rules at convention -- because then it wouldn't be in contravention of prior rules, but in accordance with them.

Would RP have enough supporters there to prevent a rule change? What kind of majority do they need to change a rule? 67%? 51%?

 

[anaconda]

Well, we're not going to elect, select, allocate or bind any delegates. We're going to unbind the delegates to freely vote their conscience at the national convention. And how could anyone voting in good conscience elect anyone but Paul?

So lemme get this straight. Is NV currently "bound?" And the RNC is shitting bricks that they might change the rule this weekend?

 

[sailingaway]

So lemme get this straight. Is NV currently "bound?" And the RNC is shitting bricks that they might change the rule this weekend?

Yes. Because they expect us to have enough votes, and we hope we will, as well. Ron is speaking there this weekend.

 

[DamianTV]

Yes. Because they expect us to have enough votes, and we hope we will, as well. Ron is speaking there this weekend.

Actually, not entirely true. Im a State Delegate, dont plan (cant afford) the National Convention. They were only bound for the first round, but State and National, the Delegates are Completely Unbound. That means the reported numbers mean exactly jack shit. And in two / three days (depending on how long our State Convention lasts) we are going to take them by STORM.