CFL State Organization Info

Dustancostine

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,735
This memo has been made available at all of the Texas district organizational meetings so I thought I would post it here because it might help out with those who want to start their own state organizations (as we are doing in Texas).

FROM: JOHN F. TATE

SUBJECT: C4L STATE ORGANIZATION PLAN

As a national grassroots organization striving for bottom-up cooperation and looking to avoid a rigid, top-down structure, Campaign for Liberty will work with organizations in individual states on education, training and lobbying projects.

Our goal is to support true grassroots action by aiding our supporters and activists with independent organizations in each state having complete autonomy.

Any state organizations formed will be independent and will not be legally affiliated with the national Campaign for Liberty organization.

The Campaign for Liberty will continue appointing state coordinators for its national organization.

State Coordinators will have the autonomy to facilitate grass roots organization in any way they choose, conforming with state and federal law and in accordance with Campaign for Liberty guidelines. The Campaign for Liberty will provide appropriate support and cooperate with State Coordinators and their efforts.

Campaign for Liberty can remove or replace a State Coordinator designation at any time.

Our intention is to help the state coordinators organize and establish their own independent State organizations, when they determine it is advisable. We know that every state, every county, every locality is different and what works in Michigan may not work in Alabama. While members in Michigan may choose to set up a separate state organization supporters in Texas may choose not to set up such an organization and instead simply work through the national organization.

In addition, there must be, and are, certain guidelines established for the use of the Campaign for Liberty name and logo.

The Campaign for Liberty name and logo will be trademarked.

When a state’s leaders determine they are sufficiently organized they will provide to the national Campaign for Liberty organization a letter requesting official recognition, along with a list of proposed Board members, a proposed organizational structure and a strategic plan for the following 12 months.

Once approved by Campaign for Liberty the state leader may be aided with drafting bylaws, incorporation papers, certification of 501(c)4 status, and other items as mutually agreed upon. Once recognized, they may use the Campaign for Liberty name and logo as a “friend of/partner with Campaign for Liberty”.

Campaign for Liberty reserves the right to revoke such recognition at any time.

All officially recognized State organizations may receive support and financial assistance from C4L based on need, legitimacy of the request and the availability of funds, staff and materials.

This support and aid may consist of (but is not necessarily limited to): fundraising help, communications with C4L members on behalf of the state organization; copy writing, issue promotion, materials, speakers, news releases, and direct financial aid.

The mission of C4L as previously stated is to Promote and Defend:

Individual Liberty
Constitutional Government
Sound Money
Free Markets
Non-Interventionist Foreign Policy

Specific issues will come and go over time, however, there are some issues that C4L should promote on both the federal and state levels.

In general we will look at state groups that are fighting on issues that by merely fighting the battle (whether we win or lose) will:

a) Mobilize our supporters, increase membership and energize our base
b) Generate financial support and otherwise help C4L and our allies
c) In some way cause harm to the opposition
d) Help, in the long run, achieve public policy consistent with the mission of C4L

Ultimately, the state activists, independent state organizations and C4L grass roots operations will decide for themselves what issues to promote and oppose in their own states. The goal of National C4L will be to aid them when we are in agreement by providing resources, training, materials and possibly funding to fight these battles.

We are in no position to fight EVERY battle, and will have to look at each battle individually to determine our level of involvement.

Obviously the top issues will change in every state, and nationally, as Congress, the Obama Administration and the state legislatures pursue their own agendas. Campaign for Liberty must be in a position to change our legislative agenda accordingly, without chasing after every barking dog.

Therefore, we must remain focused, on message and prepared to promote our agenda, not only respond to the agenda of the other side.

By concentrating our efforts in only those areas that make us stronger and promote good public policy, we will continue to grow stronger, more effective and become a major force to be reckoned with for years to come.

 
Nice to see. I would like to see some guarantee about state coordinators eventually relinquishing to elections, but this will work. That could be circumvented though if you had a decent coordinator who agreed to hold elections and would resign if they lost.
 
It is accurate, all state coordinators got same email. So get started in your own state to figure out what kind of state org your state wants
 
So get started in your own state to figure out what kind of state org your state wants
We're having our first state-wide organizational meeting on Saturday. 75+ people are already registered and Rand Paul will be there too.


And what kind of choices do we have for organization?
 
We're having our first state-wide organizational meeting on Saturday. 75+ people are already registered and Rand Paul will be there too.


And what kind of choices do we have for organization?

Whatever kind fits your states needs and the people in your state agree to
 
Last edited:
Call me cynical but I just like to see e-mail headers.
Dustan has been in this movement for as long, or longer, than you have, Matt, and he is very active in Texas.

I wonder why this wasn't sent out to TN? :confused:
Cool it with the :confused:. It's way past ridiculous. We can all make a guess, but the reality is, that none of us really knows. So, if you have a question for C4L, go ask them, Matt. Unless your intention is really to spread doubt.
 
Cool it with the :confused:. It's way past ridiculous. We can all make a guess, but the reality is, that none of us really knows. So, if you have a question for C4L, go ask them, Matt. Unless your intention is really to spread doubt.
No of course it's not. And why are you trying to pick a fight with me at every opportunity? :confused::rolleyes:
 
fascinating indeed. I'd like to know the date this email was sent and how far it has spread.

I am particularly interested to know what kinds of discussions have come up around these:

In general we will look at state groups that are fighting on issues that by merely fighting the battle (whether we win or lose) will:

a) Mobilize our supporters, increase membership and energize our base
b) Generate financial support and otherwise help C4L and our allies
c) In some way cause harm to the opposition
d) Help, in the long run, achieve public policy consistent with the mission of C4L

a) pretty clear this has always been a focus of the grassroots, glad to see C4L make this part of the mission!
b) this is a little sketchy. I'd like to see local money stay local. Also like to know who decides who is an ally on local and state levels.
c) Very sketchy. This can be taken so many ways.
d) I am sure in the long run we'd all like to achieve public policy consistent with the constitution.

overall, its nice to see so language taking shape. I'd say keep working on it though and continue to be open to input from the grassroots. National shouldn't be afraid to let the local issues drive the national issues. We need to focus on what appear to be common issue to us all.

Lets make a push for income tax elimination, this is becoming popular.
Lets make a push for INCREASING regulation and oversite... On the FED and treasury. This is becoming popular.
Lets focus on the successful messages that have made it through the media white wash.

Only the national campaign will have the input to see what is common on the local levels. National Campaign ought to sponsor more polls. National campaign ought to use that voter list and donation list to send out communication thanking people for their continued support. National ought to be more active in gathering data from the base rather than focusing so much on lobbying efforts and generating revenues. My 2 cents.

And

lol
 
overall, its nice to see so language taking shape.
I agree, now if we could just see some hard and fast rules come out specifically by-laws, binding documents, etc it would give a much better overall understanding. But this did help even though it isn't binding.
 
Would you be willing to forward me the actual e-mail?

I did not receive it as an email from the CFL but as a printed memo at our district meetings.

In Texas we are meeting to decide what type of organization to form. The national CFL is not helping with this, we are doing all on our own (time and money). This memo was provided to us by our State CFL Coordinator after it was sent to her, to guide us in the process of forming our organization.

The point of the memo is that you are responsible for forming your own state organization. You can do it how you please, and as long as your org and the CFL agree, then you can apply to become affiliated with the CFL and use their logo. The CFL is not going to tell you what to do, although I am sure that your state CFL coordinators will help you out and lend valuable guidance. This is a great bottom up strategy by the CFL, as you can tailor your state organization to fit the needs of your state structures.

(For Matt Collins) The only part of the memo I left out was the following:

January 8, 2009

MEMORANDUM

TO: C4L STAFF, C4L STATE COORDINATORS


I am guessing that it was sent via email to staff and state coordinators on that day or the day before.

FYI, For those that want to know, this is what we are doing in Texas. (Jeremy correct me if I am wrong).

At the Rally for the Republic, the summit attendees from each CD in Texas held a meeting after the summit, at that meeting we decided to call mass meetings to determine whether or not we wanted a state liberty organization in Texas.

It was decided that four individuals would coordinate these meetings. They were charged with holding regional meetings (Texas is big!) that would elect delegates to a state convention. At the state convention the delegates from the regional meetings would determine if we are to form a state organization, and what type of organization it will be and what the bylaws/constitution will look like, and hopefully if it is the will of the majority, ratify it.

All of these meeting are being held via Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised and is open to anybody whatsoever, as long as they participate in the correct Regional meeting in which they vote in.

So far we have held 6 regional meetings, Dallas, Waco, San Antonio, McAllen, Houston and El Paso, and have one to go, Lubbock. I am guessing but combined we probably have had around 700 attend these meetings, we are hoping the attendance to the state meeting (which is open to the public, only dels can vote) will be around 500.

Hope this Helps.

--Dustan
 
I did not receive it as an email from the CFL but as a printed memo at our district meetings.

In Texas we are meeting to decide what type of organization to form. The national CFL is not helping with this, we are doing all on our own (time and money). This memo was provided to us by our State CFL Coordinator after it was sent to her, to guide us in the process of forming our organization.

The point of the memo is that you are responsible for forming your own state organization. You can do it how you please, and as long as your org and the CFL agree, then you can apply to become affiliated with the CFL and use their logo. The CFL is not going to tell you what to do, although I am sure that your state CFL coordinators will help you out and lend valuable guidance. This is a great bottom up strategy by the CFL, as you can tailor your state organization to fit the needs of your state structures.

(For Matt Collins) The only part of the memo I left out was the following:

January 8, 2009

MEMORANDUM

TO: C4L STAFF, C4L STATE COORDINATORS


I am guessing that it was sent via email to staff and state coordinators on that day or the day before.

FYI, For those that want to know, this is what we are doing in Texas. (Jeremy correct me if I am wrong).

At the Rally for the Republic, the summit attendees from each CD in Texas held a meeting after the summit, at that meeting we decided to call mass meetings to determine whether or not we wanted a state liberty organization in Texas.

It was decided that four individuals would coordinate these meetings. They were charged with holding regional meetings (Texas is big!) that would elect delegates to a state convention. At the state convention the delegates from the regional meetings would determine if we are to form a state organization, and what type of organization it will be and what the bylaws/constitution will look like, and hopefully if it is the will of the majority, ratify it.

All of these meeting are being held via Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised and is open to anybody whatsoever, as long as they participate in the correct Regional meeting in which they vote in.

So far we have held 6 regional meetings, Dallas, Waco, San Antonio, McAllen, Houston and El Paso, and have one to go, Lubbock. I am guessing but combined we probably have had around 700 attend these meetings, we are hoping the attendance to the state meeting (which is open to the public, only dels can vote) will be around 500.

Hope this Helps.

--Dustan

Having experienced the heavy hand of Washington style top-down management from CFL, I would suggest an independent Liberty movement. The memo states that national CFL can remove anyone they want.
 
But a memo is not a binding document nor is it the by-laws. I want to see what the official texts have to say. While a memo is great, it isn't binding.

well since the states are independent why don't you focus on that and you can put whatever bylaws in place that your state agrees too.
 
Back
Top