CDC's Vaccine Safety Research is Exposed as Flawed and Falsified in Peer-Reviewed Scientific J

[Weston White]

The science is absolutely proved. There are literally hundreds of studies indicating that thermisol is safe and effective. There are no studies proving that it causes any harm what so ever. Taking thermisol out did not mae anybody any healthier. It made vaccines more expensive. (Stupid is always expensive....)

The CDC made the mistake of trying to placate large groups of scientifically retarded people based on a single study by a man who was convicted of fraud over it, and who stood to make millions of dollars from the replacement product he planned to market.

Debunked, and yet again:

Was Dr. Andrew Wakefield Right After All?
Doctor wins after MMR-vaccine link paper with Wakefield
New Published Study Verifies Andrew Wakefield’s Research on Autism – Again (MMR Vaccine Causes Autism)
Autism Parents Respond to Dr. Andrew Wakefield's Libel Writ Against The British Medical Journal
Wakefield Libel Case vs BMJ, Godlee & Deer – Appeal Hearing 22nd May – Texas Third Court of Appeals

I could go on but I think all of with reasoned minds gets the point by now.

 

[donnay]

I wanted to add some more info about Dr. Andrew Wakefield:

[Dr Wakefield was caught up in the vaccine damage fallout from MMR when parents brought him, and his team, their vaccine bowel damaged children. Supported by his hospital, he then said in a public meeting that single vaccines would be a good idea over MMR. When the shit hit the fan he was thrown to the wolves (by the likes of Professor Zuckerman), and is a perfect example of what happens when you criticise vaccines. They are now trying to break him (take away his licence and stop him being an expert witness for the vaccine damaged) with a medical kangaroo court. You can see why medical industry people keep their heads below the parapet, unless they fancy a new job in Australia or the USA.

He was the perfect man in the right place at the right time as regards truth and the welfare of children. The vaccine industry couldn't care less about children as their actions demonstrate here, and historically (eg suppressing Vitamin C cure for infections: see). Read (mostly) Martin Walker's GMC reporting here, especially this recent Interview of Martin Walker. You won't see a better example of medical psychopathy in action. Historically it reminds one of how they tried to break Dr Hadwen with a manslaughter charge, and you can see the long history of persecuted (mostly cancer) doctors here. A recent escapee from GMC vaccine tyranny was Dr Jayne Donegan.

Notice also how the media, especially the BBC (see The Greek Chorus), just spews anti-Wakefield propaganda.]

Continued...

 

[Working Poor]

For the record, let’s get the Wakefield story correct. Dr. Wakefield never said there was a definite link between vaccines and the MMR vaccination, only that there was a possible connection and reason for concern that ought to be investigated. Dr. Wakefield’s story reminds one of Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis’s tragic encounter when he suggested that physicians wash their hands after doing autopsies on women who died in child birth BEFORE going into the birthing wards and examining women in labor. Semmelweis cut childbirth fever deaths from 30 percent to about 3 percent in his wing of the hospital, yet his colleagues considered him a nut case. So, what do physicians do today, especially surgeons? Scrub and prepare for 10 to 20 minutes before surgery—isn’t that the routine? Oh the games grown men play, especially when high-stake money is involved, as with Big Pharma and its vaccines, in my opinion.

http://www.whale.to/v/wakefield61.html

 

[Zippyjuan]

It certainly is what you and your like-minded friends keep insinuating, that either vaccines are free of all such compounds or that it simply does not matter one way or the other.

And why do you keep writing "thimerisol free", what exactly is "thimerisol"? Are you meaning to type "Thimerosal"?

Thank you for correcting my spelling. Yes,- both actually- as I have repeated, there are a few vaccines which still contain some thimerosal such as the flu vaccine. But there is none in any of the vaccines intended for children- part of their vaccination schedule. Yes, you can find incredibly small amounts of mercury in virtually everything so nothing on the planet can be called truely mercury free if you want to get technical at the atomic level. But the levels are so incredibly small they are of no significance. The mercury which IS in vaccines is half eliminated by the body within less than a week so it is also unable to accumulate.

 

[Zippyjuan]

http://www.whale.to/v/wakefield61.html

Dr. Wakefield never said there was a definite link between vaccines and the MMR vaccination, only that there was a possible connection and reason for concern that ought to be investigated.

Fascinating. Maybe that should be investigated.

 

[Weston White]

Thank you for correcting my spelling. Yes,- both actually- as I have repeated, there are a few vaccines which still contain some thimerosal such as the flu vaccine. But there is none in any of the vaccines intended for children- part of their vaccination schedule. Yes, you can find incredibly small amounts of mercury in virtually everything so nothing on the planet can be called truely mercury free if you want to get technical at the atomic level. But the levels are so incredibly small they are of no significance. The mercury which IS in vaccines is half eliminated by the body within less than a week so it is also unable to accumulate.

The distinction being that individuals are of course not stuffing those things down their gullets or injecting them straight through their blood-brain-barriers. Notable excerpts from Mercury Detoxification: The Natural Way to Remove Mercury from Your Body, by Tom McGuire, DDS (therein addressing mercury containing amalgam fillings, which uses its purest ‘elemental’ form in a 1:2 ratio; while vaccines use ‘inorganic’ mercury (however, there is an apparent discrepancy on this matter as thimerosal is actually an organometallic (i.e., organomercury) compound, meaning a hybrid of both organic and inorganic chemistry and depending upon the source is listed as either organic—mercury’s most danger form—or inorganic), in its second most dangerous form, labeled as a mercuric chloride or ethylmercury based compound) includes:

Mercury is the most poisonous naturally-occurring, non-radioactive substance on earth, many times more toxic than arsenic, lead, or cadmium. While all forms of mercury are extremely toxic, organic mercury is the most toxic, closely followed by elemental and then by inorganic. The type I’m most concerned with is elemental mercury, because this is what is used in amalgam fillings.

Any amount of mercury is too much and it is toxic in very small amounts, micrograms! The body has no use for it and just one atom of mercury can have a harmful effect. To fully appreciate how challenging it is for the body to track down and remove every atom of mercury it has been exposed to it’s helpful to know just how many atoms there are in one microgram. As you can see, a microgram is extraordinarily small. But here is the scary part—just one microgram of mercury contains roughly 300,000,000,000,000 (that’s 300 trillion!) atoms of mercury. And every one of them is doing some damage to your body!!!

How Long Will It Take to Get Mercury Out of the Body?

This is one of the most commonly asked questions. The fact that mercury doesn’t have a half-life in the body means that there can be no predetermined time for getting it out. If you’ve done any research of this subject you’ve undoubtedly heard a lot of numbers thrown out regarding how long it takes to get mercury out of the body. Some say 6 months to a year to remove it from the general body. The consensus figure for how long it takes to remove it from the brain is about 20 years, give or take a few. But because everyone is different in regards to the extent of exposure, its duration, how much is actually stored, where it is stored and what you do, or don’t do, to support your body’s efforts to remove it; the actual amount of time can vary dramatically from person to person.

Furthermore, from general vaccine FAQ:

Is there thimerosal in flu vaccines?

Yes. The majority of influenza vaccines distributed in the United States contain thimerosal as a preservative. However, an increasing amount is thimerosal-free. While the multiple dose vials still have thimerosal to prevent bacterial growth, the single-dose preparations do not. The amount of influenza vaccine that is thimerosal-free is growing every year.

Is there thimerosal in childhood vaccines today?

Since 2001, all routinely recommended vaccines (except for the flu vaccine) for administration to young children in the U.S. contain no thimerosal or only trace amounts.

What is a trace amount?

• Thimerosal is still used in the early stages of the manufacturing process of a few vaccines to ensure the production line is sterile. It is removed through a purification process, with only trace remaining (about 1/100th of the amount found in older vaccines).
• Vaccines with trace amounts of thimerosal are labeled "preservative-free." Vaccines that do not contain any thimerosal are labeled "thimerosal-free."
• Manufacturers are working to remove this trace amount found in a few vaccines.

Quoting from Wikipedia on the subject of ethylmercury—noting that nothing anyplace addresses the damage taking place within the body during this (presumably) short period of time (this to me reads like absolute junk science):

Unlike methylmercury [organic], ethylmercury [inorganic] has not been found to bioaccumulate.The toxicity of ethylmercury is not well studied – exposure standards based on methylmercury (such as those currently recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency) have not been demonstrated to be equivalent for ethylmercury. Ethylmercury clears from blood with a half-life of about 18 days in adults. Ethylmercury is eliminated from the brain in about 14 days in infant monkeys. Risk assessment for effects on the nervous system have been made by extrapolating from dose-response relationships for methylmercury. Methylmercury and ethylmercury distribute to all body tissues, crossing the blood–brain barrier and the placental barrier, and ethylmercury also moves freely throughout the body. Concerns based on extrapolations from methylmercury caused thiomersal to be removed from U.S. childhood vaccines, starting in 1999. Since then, it has been found that ethylmercury is eliminated from the body and the brain significantly faster than methylmercury, so the late-1990s risk assessments turned out to be overly conservative. Though inorganic mercury metabolized from ethylmercury has a much longer half-life in the brain, at least 120 days [the average lifecycle blood cells], it appears to be much less toxic than the inorganic mercury produced from mercury vapor, for reasons not yet understood.

Further concern involves the binding process between ethylmercury’s mercuric chloride and the aluminum contained within vaccines (again from Wikipedia):

As a chemical reagent

Mercuric chloride is occasionally used to form an amalgam with metals, such as aluminium. Upon treatment with an aqueous solution of mercuric chloride, aluminium strips quickly become covered by a thin layer of the amalgam. Normally, aluminium is protected by a thin layer of oxide, thus making it inert. Once amalgamated, aluminium can undergo a variety of reactions. For example, it will dissolve in water (this can be dangerous, as hydrogen gas and heat are generated). Halocarbons react with amalgamated aluminium in the Barbier reaction. These alkylaluminium compounds are nucleophilic and can be used in a similar fashion to the Grignard reagent. Amalgamated aluminium is also used as a reducing agent in organic synthesis. Zinc is also commonly amalgamated using mercuric chloride.

Mercuric chloride is used to remove dithiane groups attached to a carbonyl in an umpolung reaction. This reaction exploits the high affinity of Hg2+ for anionic sulfur ligands.

Thiomersal’s toxicology, also as noted within Wikipedia:

Thiomersal (i.e., thimerosal) is very toxic by inhalation, ingestion, and in contact with skin (EC hazard symbol T+), with a danger of cumulative effects. It is also very toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause long-term adverse effects in aquatic environments (EC hazard symbol N).

“NFPA 704 [Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response]: Health code: 3—Short exposure could cause serious temporary or moderate residual injury (e.g. chlorine).”

And further addressing mercuric chloride:

Once used as a treatment for syphilis, it is no longer used for medicinal purposes because of mercury toxicity and the availability of superior treatments.

“NFPA 704: Health code 4—Very short exposure could cause death or major residual injury (e.g. hydrogen cyanide, phosphine, carbon monoxide, sarin, hydrofluoric acid), VX gas:

Emphasizing that you desire only to focus on its presumably shortened lifespan (or “half-life”) and not whatsoever on its potential for inflicting damage and harm during that period, regardless if in the short-term or long-term. And finally noting that mercury is best detoxified from the body through a study intake of natural supplements over the course of several months, including: Chlorella, cilantro, milk thistle, garlic, etc.

 

[Zippyjuan]

How Long Will It Take to Get Mercury Out of the Body?

This is one of the most commonly asked questions. The fact that mercury doesn’t have a half-life in the body means that there can be no predetermined time for getting it out. If you’ve done any research of this subject you’ve undoubtedly heard a lot of numbers thrown out regarding how long it takes to get mercury out of the body. Some say 6 months to a year to remove it from the general body. The consensus figure for how long it takes to remove it from the brain is about 20 years, give or take a few. But because everyone is different in regards to the extent of exposure, its duration, how much is actually stored, where it is stored and what you do, or don’t do, to support your body’s efforts to remove it; the actual amount of time can vary dramatically from person to person.

Study on that: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280369/

In the current study, researchers assigned 41 newborn monkeys to one of three exposure groups. Seventeen of the monkeys were injected with vaccines spiked with thimerosal for a total mercury dose of 20 micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg) at ages 0, 7, 14, and 21 days, mimicking the typical schedule of vaccines for human infants. At the same ages, another 17 monkeys received 20 μg/kg methylmercury by stomach tube to mimic typical methylmercury exposure. A third group of 7 monkeys served as unexposed controls.

The researchers drew blood from all monkeys prior to any exposure and at other points prior to sacrifice, which occurred 2, 4, 7, or 28 days after the last dosing on day 21. Total mercury concentrations were measured in blood samples, and total and inorganic mercury concentrations were measured in brain samples. Organic mercury concentrations were calculated from those values.

The initial absorption rate and tissue distribution of mercury was similar in both exposed groups. However, total mercury progressively accumulated in the blood of methylmercury-exposed monkeys and remained detectable 28 days after the last dose. Among thimerosal-exposed monkeys, total mercury in blood declined rapidly between doses, and the researchers estimated clearance to be 5.4-fold higher than in the methylmercury group. In the thimerosal group, the half-life of total mercury in blood was 6.9 days, compared to 19.1 days for the methylmercury group.

Brain concentrations of total mercury were approximately 3–4 times lower in the thimerosal group than in the methylmercury group, and total mercury cleared more rapidly in the thimerosal group (with a half-life of 24.2 days versus 59.5 days).

Methyl mercury is the more toxic version- the one found in things like tuna fish and breast milk.

What is a trace amount?
Thimerosal is still used in the early stages of the manufacturing process of a few vaccines to ensure the production line is sterile. It is removed through a purification process, with only trace remaining (about 1/100th of the amount found in older vaccines).
Vaccines with trace amounts of thimerosal are labeled "preservative-free." Vaccines that do not contain any thimerosal are labeled "thimerosal-free."
Manufacturers are working to remove this trace amount found in a few vaccines.

One one hundredth of the previous amount would mean 25 times ten to the minus eighth grams- 0.000000025 grams. It is an insignificant quantity.

just one atom of mercury can have a harmful effect.

Hype. Everything you eat or drink has atoms of mercury in it. How come more people don't have mercury poisoning?

 

[CPUd]

Any amount of mercury is too much and it is toxic in very small amounts, micrograms! The body has no use for it and just one atom of mercury can have a harmful effect. To fully appreciate how challenging it is for the body to track down and remove every atom of mercury it has been exposed to it’s helpful to know just how many atoms there are in one microgram. As you can see, a microgram is extraordinarily small. But here is the scary part—just one microgram of mercury contains roughly 300,000,000,000,000 (that’s 300 trillion!) atoms of mercury. And every one of them is doing some damage to your body!!!

Any amount of mercury is too much and it is toxic in very small amounts, micrograms! The body has no use for it and just one atom of mercury can have a harmful effect. To fully appreciate how challenging it is for the body to track down and remove every atom of mercury it has been exposed to it’s helpful to know just how many atoms there are in one microgram. As you can see, a microgram is extraordinarily small. But here is the scary part—just one microgram of mercury contains roughly 300,000,000,000,000 (that’s 300 trillion!) atoms of mercury. And every one of them is doing some damage to your body!!!

just one atom of mercury can have a harmful effect.

just one atom of mercury can have a harmful effect.

just one atom of mercury can have a harmful effect.

/thread

 

[Weston White]

Study on that: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280369/

Methyl mercury is the more toxic version- the one found in things like tuna fish and breast milk.

One one hundredth of the previous amount would mean 25 times ten to the minus eighth grams- 0.000000025 grams. It is an insignificant quantity.

Hype. Everything you eat or drink has atoms of mercury in it. How come more people don't have mercury poisoning?

So breast milk (ignoring for the moment on how mercury is getting into breast milk in the first place) and hype is your response? Would you be surprised to learn that your reply is not at all that very surprising?

But, you of course mean everything has mercury in it with exception to virtually all vaccinations of course?

...“I’m finished with this guy.” — Vinny Gambini

 

[Zippyjuan]

I have not said no vaccine contains a single atom of mercury. You are being silly.

How much is there? 25 mg per ml is 25 parts per million. That is the amount in the few vaccines which still use thimerisol. Those without thimerosal have less than 25 parts per billion in the vaccine. One part per billion is a pinch of salt added to ten tons of potato chips. And that is the amount in the vaccine which is one half a ml. That is further diluted by adding that tiny amount to the mass of a human body which is 45,400 grams if the person weighs 100 pounds. 0.000000025 grams added to 45,000 grams (25 times ten to the minus eighth power into a mass 45 times ten to the third power).

But one atom can kill. We are all dead anyways.

 

[donnay]

Peer-review mafia ring busted; science journal forced to retract 60 papers after fabricated re

Peer-review mafia ring busted; science journal forced to retract 60 papers after fabricated reviews exposed

Sunday, July 27, 2014
by: Jonathan Benson

Dozens of scientific papers have been pulled from a prominent international journal after an investigation revealed that they were all illicitly passed through the peer-review process. All 60 studies, explains a recent announcement by the independent academic publishing group SAGE, were the product of a covert "peer review ring" involving phony peer reviewers that were completely fabricated and non-existent.

All of the studies had been published in the Journal of Vibration and Control (JVC) by a Taiwanese professor named Peter Chen, who at the time worked for the National Pingtung University of Education (NPUE). Chen allegedly created a number of aliases in the SAGE Track system, which he then used to peer review his own papers as if he were other people.

"In total 60 articles have been retracted from JVC after evidence led to at least one author or reviewer being implicated in the peer review ring," reads an announcement by SAGE.

The investigation began after JVC's then Editor-in-Chief, Professor Ali H. Nayfeh, became aware of the fact that the SAGE Track system was being abused back in 2013. He took immediate action, aiding in the launch of a full investigation that eventually revealed many of the papers published by Chen to be fraudulent.

"While investigating the JVC papers submitted and reviewed by Peter Chen, it was discovered that the author had created various aliases on SAGE Track, providing different email addresses to set up more than one account," explains SAGE.

"Consequently, SAGE scrutinized further the co-authors of and reviewers selected for Peter Chen's papers, (and) these names appeared to form part of a peer review ring."

In accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Prof. Nayfeh contacted Chen and gave him an opportunity to respond to the investigation's findings before they were published. Chen responded, but apparently provided an unsatisfactory explanation, resulting in NPUE being directly notified in September 2013 of the proceedings.

Together with SAGE and JVC, NPUE helped uncover the fraudulent citations and peer reviews present in the 60 papers, which then gave the green light for Thomson Reuters to fully retract all of them. Several months later in May 2014, NPUE notified SAGE and JVC that Chen had resigned from his position at the school in February.

Around the same time, Prof. Nayfeh announced his own retirement from JVC.

Continued...

 

[Weston White]

But one atom can kill. We are all dead anyways.

Do you really not get what eugenics is about? It is not about “killing” that more over falls inline with democide or genocide. It is about covert racism, along with a general hatred of humankind, and the acquisition of control and power, being obtained through the lifelong manipulation of human biology, division by class warfare, stupefying the masses, poisoning the masses, instituting population control programs, hampering human abilities: from being able rationalize, to realizing conception or carry to term, to fighting off illness, to consuming healthy sustenance, and so on.

 

[Zippyjuan]

So you are saying that vaccines are trying to harm particular groups? Which ones? How does a vaccine determine which group a person is a member of? "Covert racism"? Really? "general hatred of humankind"? How many people used to die from the diseases vaccines prevent and how many die from actual vaccines? If vaccines are to weaken people, they should be more succeptable to diseases and die sooner. Is that why life expectancy has been increasing along with the use of vaccines?

 

[CPUd]

Peer-review mafia ring busted; science journal forced to retract 60 papers after fabricated reviews exposed

Sunday, July 27, 2014
by: Jonathan Benson

Dozens of scientific papers have been pulled from a prominent international journal after an investigation revealed that they were all illicitly passed through the peer-review process. All 60 studies, explains a recent announcement by the independent academic publishing group SAGE, were the product of a covert "peer review ring" involving phony peer reviewers that were completely fabricated and non-existent.

All of the studies had been published in the Journal of Vibration and Control (JVC) by a Taiwanese professor named Peter Chen, who at the time worked for the National Pingtung University of Education (NPUE). Chen allegedly created a number of aliases in the SAGE Track system, which he then used to peer review his own papers as if he were other people.

"In total 60 articles have been retracted from JVC after evidence led to at least one author or reviewer being implicated in the peer review ring," reads an announcement by SAGE.

The investigation began after JVC's then Editor-in-Chief, Professor Ali H. Nayfeh, became aware of the fact that the SAGE Track system was being abused back in 2013. He took immediate action, aiding in the launch of a full investigation that eventually revealed many of the papers published by Chen to be fraudulent.

"While investigating the JVC papers submitted and reviewed by Peter Chen, it was discovered that the author had created various aliases on SAGE Track, providing different email addresses to set up more than one account," explains SAGE.

"Consequently, SAGE scrutinized further the co-authors of and reviewers selected for Peter Chen's papers, (and) these names appeared to form part of a peer review ring."

In accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Prof. Nayfeh contacted Chen and gave him an opportunity to respond to the investigation's findings before they were published. Chen responded, but apparently provided an unsatisfactory explanation, resulting in NPUE being directly notified in September 2013 of the proceedings.

Together with SAGE and JVC, NPUE helped uncover the fraudulent citations and peer reviews present in the 60 papers, which then gave the green light for Thomson Reuters to fully retract all of them. Several months later in May 2014, NPUE notified SAGE and JVC that Chen had resigned from his position at the school in February.

Around the same time, Prof. Nayfeh announced his own retirement from JVC.

Continued...

I'm not sure you realize what you've done here.

 

[donnay]

I'm not sure you realize what you've done here.

What did I do?

 

[Weston White]

So you are saying that vaccines are trying to harm particular groups? Which ones? How does a vaccine determine which group a person is a member of? "Covert racism"? Really? "general hatred of humankind"? How many people used to die from the diseases vaccines prevent and how many die from actual vaccines? If vaccines are to weaken people, they should be more succeptable to diseases and die sooner. Is that why life expectancy has been increasing along with the use of vaccines?

1. If people were dropping dead left and right, the program would be exposed for what it truly is and outright fail. It is rather more complex than the simplistic, e.g., Leopold II, Joseph Stalin, Adolph Hitler, Mao Ze-Dong, Pol Pot, et al, have already attempted similar tactics; apparently those despotic learn from their past mistakes and move ahead with new programs, guises, and tact.
2. Ultimately, vaccine programs function as an ongoing experiment, being refined the longer it continues.
3. Vaccine programs serves to provide vast sums of wealth and power to those in the know, establishing new levels of social precedents and public policy.
4. Vaccine programs are not the only explanation as to why diseases have decreased throughout society, e.g., improved food processing requirements, waste and refuge management, water purification, ready access to restrooms, washing machines, dishwashers, refrigerators and freezers, cleaning equipment, and the like.
5. It targets only those ignorant to the facts, for example: Dr. Oz exposed promotes vaccine on TV but admits he won’t give it to his own children (Noting that a campaign has been launched to get his medical license pulled: Why Dr. Oz can say anything and keep his medical license.)
6. If you want to speak to social experiments involving diabetes, syphilis, HIV/AIDS, drug addiction, subjugation through the influx of poverty, and the like that is another subject all together.

8 Damn Good Reasons Not to Get the Flu Shot

REASON #1: NEUROTOXIC INGREDIENTS

A common urban myth is that the mercury has been taken out of vaccines. This is not true.

Several of the flu vaccines contain a neurotoxic ingredient called thimerosal (mercury). Each one of the flu vaccines listed below contains 25 micrograms of mercury. [1] The vaccines are:

• Afluria CSL (Limited for Merck)
• FluLaval (GlaxoSmithKline)
• Fluvirin (Novartis)
• Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur)

Keep in mind you are being told conflicting stories.

After parents and scientists discovered that mercury was present in the vaccines, they had concerns about the substance causing neurological problems in children.

Organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control have told you mercury in the vaccines isn’t bad for us, but as a precaution, it will be taken out of the vaccines.

Now the same organizations are telling parents if mercury isn’t kept it in the vaccines, millions will suffer. Why? Removing the mercury from vaccines would cause a major disruption in the manufacturing and supply of vaccines.[2]

Much of the evidence on the toxicity of thimerosal was swept under the rug at a secret meeting held by the Centers for Disease Control in Simpsonwood, Georgia. I’d like to invite you to read a few quotes from the meeting. I think you will see why the Centers for Disease Control wants to keep the lid on thimerosal.

Here are three important quotes from the Simpsonwood Document:

“…the number of dose related relationships [between mercury and autism] are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant.” – Dr. William Weil, American Academy of Pediatrics. Simpsonwood, GA, June 7, 2000

“Forgive this personal comment, but I got called out at eight o’clock for an emergency call and my daughter-in-law delivered a son by c-section. Our first male in the line of the next generation and I do not want that grandson to get a Thimerosal containing vaccine until we know better what is going on. It will probably take a long time. In the meantime, and I know there are probably implications for this internationally, but in the meanwhile I think I want that grandson to only be given Thimerosal-free vaccines.” – Dr. Robert Johnson, Immunologist, University of Colorado, Simpsonwood, GA, June 7, 2000

“But there is now the point at which the research results have to be handled, and even if this committee decides that there is no association and that information gets out, the work has been done and through the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in other ways beyond the control of this group. And I am very concerned about that as I suspect that it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and what they say…My mandate as I sit here in this group is to make sure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possible Hib, this year, next year and for many years to come, and that will have to be with thimerosal containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and an alternative is found quickly and is tried and found to be safe.” – Dr. John Clements, World Health Organization, Simpsonwood, GA, June 7, 2000 [3]

We at VacTruth encourage you to investigate what is being injected into your child.

REASON #2: 4250% INCREASE IN FETAL DEATHS REPORTED

Speaking of mercury being unsafe — if you’re pregnant, beware of doctors using aggressive fear tactics pushing you to get vaccinated. Here’s why…

On September 27, 2012, the Human and Environmental Toxicology Journal (HET) published a study by Dr. Gary Goldman reporting a 4,250 percent increase in the number of miscarriages and stillbirths reported to VAERS in the 2009/2010 flu season. [4]

That year the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) had recommended the double-dosing pregnant mothers with two flu shots spiked with mercury.

In his abstract, Goldman said:

“The aim of this study was to compare the number of inactivated-influenza vaccine–related spontaneous abortion and stillbirth (SB) reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database during three consecutive flu seasons beginning 2008/2009 and assess the relative fetal death reports associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season.” [4]

How can injecting these filthy vaccines into pregnant mothers be remotely safe?

REASON #3: VACCINE-INDUCED NARCOLEPSY

Do you recall the vaccine-frenzied media telling us to get our flu shots during the H1N1 pandemic? What they didn’t tell you are the possible long-term side effects of those vaccines that are now being revealed.

Recent news about the flu vaccine suspects one of the experimental vaccines causing narcolepsy in about 800 European children. [5]

Specifically, two studies in Finland directly point the finger at the vaccine. [6, 7]

The conclusion of one study states:

“We observed a 17-fold increase in the annual incidence of narcolepsy in 2010 as compared to previous years in children aged under 17 years of age. A common feature in the history of our 54 newly diagnosed childhood narcoleptic patients was that 50 children had received an adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine (Pandemrix) within 8 months before the onset of symptoms. In most cases, the development of symptoms was fast. We consider it likely that Pandemrix vaccination contributed to the increased incidence of narcolepsy in Finland…” [7]

The children’s misfortune is they now have to deal with an illness that all but destroys their once normal life. Do you think the pharmaceutical companies will take any responsibility?

REASON #4: “THEY ARE PROTECTED” … FROM YOU!

I’m not sure about other countries, but in the United States, if your child is harmed by a vaccine, there is little action you can take legally.

The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was passed was to protect pharmaceutical companies from anyone claiming a vaccine injured their child. Under this law, no parent can sue a vaccine manufacturer. [8]

If you decide to vaccinate your children, you do so at your own risk. No vaccine manufacturer is liable for your child’s vaccine-related injury or death from a recommended vaccine, regardless if the FDA or CDC helped get an untested flu vaccine approved.

REASON #5: IF YOU GET VACCINATED, YOU SHED THE VIRUS

If getting injected with neurotoxins or suffering from narcolepsy isn’t enough, expect to shed the flu virus and likely infect others if you decide to get the nasal spray vaccine.

Information from the Centers for Disease Control website indicates “that both children and adults vaccinated with live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) can shed vaccine viruses after vaccination, although in lower amounts than occur typically with shedding of wild-type influenza viruses.” [9]

In one study of children in a daycare setting, 80% of vaccine recipients shed one or more virus strains for an average of 7.5 days. [9]

REASON #6: IF YOU GET THE FLU VACCINE, EXPECT TO GET THE FLU

This might be a shock to you – if you investigate the vaccine carefully enough, you’ll discover that getting vaccinated can actually predispose you to getting the flu!

One particular study surprised researchers when they discovered “a significant positive association between the seasonal influenza vaccine and lab confirmed H1N1 was observed.” [10]

As anecdotal evidence, you may or may not have seen what happened to television host Piers Morgan. If you didn’t, here is the condensed version.

Piers Morgan went on the Dr. Oz television show to get injected with the toxic flu vaccine in front of a live audience. Days later he came down with the flu. [11]

Did the flu vaccine cause him to get the flu? You can decide for yourself on this one.

REASON #7: EVERY YEAR THE EXPERTS GUESS

Do you know how the flu strain is picked to put into the vaccine every year? The “experts” guess.

Every year, the influenza viruses in the seasonal flu vaccine are selected through calculations about what flu viruses are most likely to cause illness in the coming season. The FDA, acting in concert with the CDC, decides what vaccine strains for influenza vaccines to be sold in the U.S. [12]

What happens if the virus mutates or the “experts” guess incorrectly? Please see Reason #1…

REASON #8: THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL’S RECIPE FOR GENERATING FEAR

Many people believe the Centers for Disease Control is beyond using propaganda ploys. You might get a different impression from the information I’m about to share with you. It may seem as if the CDC fears you into getting vaccinated, much like doctors do.

What do I mean and where is this recipe?

Some years ago, the associate director for communications for the national immunization program, Glen Nowak, made a presentation entitled Planning for the 2004-05 Influenza Vaccination Season: A Communication Situation Analysis.

I am going to include the entire “recipe” so you can see the complexity of the propaganda being regularly used on you to get vaccinated.

The slide on page 27 of the presentation reads:

“Recipe” that Fosters Higher Interest and Demand for Influenza Vaccine
1. Influenza’s arrival coincides with immunization “season” (i.e., when people can take action)
2. Dominant strain and/or initial cases of disease are:
–Associated with severe illness and/or outcomes
–Occur among people for whom influenza is not generally perceived to cause serious complications (e.g., children, healthy adults, healthy seniors)
–In cities and communities with significant media outlets (e.g., daily newspapers, major TV stations)
3. Medical experts and public health authorities publicly (e.g., via media) state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)–and urge influenza vaccination.
4. The combination of ‘2’ and ‘3’ result in:
A. Significant media interest and attention
B. Framing of the flu season in terms that motivate behavior (e.g., as “very severe,” “more severe than last or past years,” “deadly”)
C. Continued reports (e.g., from health officials and media) that influenza is causing severe illness and/or affecting lots of people–helping foster the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza.
6. Visible/tangible examples of the seriousness of the illness (e.g., pictures of children, families of those affected coming forward) and people getting vaccinated (the first to motivate, the latter to reinforce)
7. References to, and discussions, of pandemic influenza– along with continued reference to the importance of vaccination.” [13]

 

[Tod]

CDC Autism Whistleblower Admits Vaccine Study Fraud

William W. Thompson, PhD, Senior Scientist with the CDC has stepped forward and admitted the 2004 paper entitled "Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta," which has been used repeatedly by the CDC to deny the MMR-autism connection, was a fraud.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14754936

Dr. Thompson has admitted the 340% increase in boys receiving the MMR vaccine "on time," as opposed to delayed, was buried by himself, Dr. DeStefano, Dr. Bhasin, Dr. Yeargin-Allsopp, and Dr. Boyle.

Dr. Thompson first called and spoke with Dr. Brian Hooker, who then revealed the information to Dr. Andrew Wakefield and the Autism Media Channel.

The video containing Dr. Thompson's recorded conversation can be found here, beginning at the 2 minute, 45 second mark.

http://vimeo.com/user5503203/review/103711143/91f7d3d4d8

Update: The Autism Media Channel website has gone down.

Update: Jon Rappoport is reporting Dr. Thompson was escorted from the CDC headquarters yesterday afternoon.

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...c-whistleblower-thompson-in-grave-danger-now/

Update: Autism Media Channel confirmed crash site was due to exceeding bandwith; no other reason.

Update: Dr. Thompson himself responds to e-mail showing support for his act of speaking out:

Thank you for your kind words.

Thanks,

Bill

William W. Thompson, PhD
Senior Scientist
National Center of Birth Defects and Development Disabilities
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1600 Clifton Road, MS-E86, RM 3079
Atlanta, GA 30333


Courier Delivery:
1825 Century Blvd., NE
MS-E86
Atlanta, GA 30345

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1164046

 

[Working Poor]

So you are saying that vaccines are trying to harm particular groups? I think they are. They are trying to take out the genius gene.

 

[osan]

Funny how science is so subject to agendas. It is easy to assume that if something is said to be science-based, it must be worthy of more respect than other human endeavors, but such blind faith is obviously misplaced.

Science is nothing but a tool. Just as with institutionalized religion, it has become widely employed as a mechanism of control through the blind faith to which you refer. Scientists are the new priesthood, their points of view at least tacitly accepted as infallible. What is so amazing there is that no matter how many times they are exposed as frauds or inept fops, the meaner remains convinced of that infallibility. "It's scientifically proven that..." It is strongly analogous to the way in which the perception of police is managed by Themme, particularly with the help of mass media: "It's just a few bad apples..." and all that tripe, as police steal, beat, maim, and murder their way through their work weeks, every week, with ever increasing frequency. No matter how many examples of this are paraded under Boobus' nose, he always accepts the assertion that the cop was justified or, in the cases where the behavior cannot be explained away and the cop in question must be sacrificed, that he was a one-in-a-million "bad apple".

God help us because we apparently are not sufficiently willing to, or capable of helping ourselves. Joey and Janey Meaner are almost literally imbecile children in adult bodies. To compare their ways of behavior and thinking with those of adults a mere two generations prior is to discover the stark differences in the way the people of their respective eras comported themselves in virtually all aspects of daily living. The more deeply one looks into this, the more shocking the reality becomes. My grandparents were born in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and when I consider how they carried themselves through their days and compare with how Meaner does, it is as if I were contemplating beings from two distant planets.

When one thinks about this with some depth and sees, it becomes clear that we are in very deep trouble and that human freedom, or the closest thing to it that we have ever known in these United States, sits at the brink of extinction.

 

[donnay]

Science is nothing but a tool. Just as with institutionalized religion, it has become widely employed as a mechanism of control through the blind faith to which you refer. Scientists are the new priesthood, their points of view at least tacitly accepted as infallible. What is so amazing there is that no matter how many times they are exposed as frauds or inept fops, the meaner remains convinced of that infallibility. "It's scientifically proven that..." It is strongly analogous to the way in which the perception of police is managed by Themme, particularly with the help of mass media: "It's just a few bad apples..." and all that tripe, as police steal, beat, maim, and murder their way through their work weeks, every week, with ever increasing frequency. No matter how many examples of this are paraded under Boobus' nose, he always accepts the assertion that the cop was justified or, in the cases where the behavior cannot be explained away and the cop in question must be sacrificed, that he was a one-in-a-million "bad apple".

God help us because we apparently are not sufficiently willing to, or capable of helping ourselves. Joey and Janey Meaner are almost literally imbecile children in adult bodies. To compare their ways of behavior and thinking with those of adults a mere two generations prior is to discover the start differences in the way the people of their respective eras comported themselves in virtually all aspects of daily living. The more deeply one looks into this, the shocking the reality becomes. My grandparents were born in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and when I consider how they carried themselves through their days and compare with how Meaner does, it is as if I were contemplating beings from two distant planets.

When one thinks about this with some depth and sees, it becomes clear that we are in very deep trouble and that human freedom, or the closest thing to it that we have ever known in these United States, sits at the brink of extinction.

Well said.