Cavuto just said about who won the debate...

mello

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
2,001
Cavuto was talking to Senator Ron Johnson & said:

"Early reads are that Marco Rubio had a good night, Ted Cruz had a good night, Rand Paul had a good night.

It took nearly two hours to hear someone mention something positive about Rand.
 
ive been watching MSNBC and Chris Mathews has been talking about Rand every other minute. Granted its not exactly our audience but at least his name is being bandied about somewhere....
 
Not to mention Stossel was supposed to be on to do a show and he wasn't.

I don't think Rand has been on Cavuto in a couple of years. He goes on every other Fox show except Cavuto and O'Reilly. Cavuto went from someone who fair to being really snarky toward Rand with other guests.
 
Last edited:
Cavuto was talking to Senator Ron Johnson & said:

"Early reads are that Marco Rubio had a good night, Ted Cruz had a good night, Rand Paul had a good night.

It took nearly two hours to hear someone mention something positive about Rand.

Media blackout dejavu.
 
Rubo and Cruz are the biggest threat. As much as we feel Rand destroyed Marco, it just sounds like most people want the big spending and wars. It's pathetic.
 
On a lighter note, Cavato really grilled Ted Cruz after the debate on his relationship with getting along with other senators on capitol hill. It was actually very embarrassing for Cruz. Good work Neil.
 
ive been watching MSNBC and Chris Mathews has been talking about Rand every other minute. Granted its not exactly our audience but at least his name is being bandied about somewhere....

Every time someone mentions Trump, Matthews says, "he's a Nationalist!"
 
Rubo and Cruz are the biggest threat. As much as we feel Rand destroyed Marco, it just sounds like most people want the big spending and wars. It's pathetic.

I think Rand just needs to qualify his statement more by pointing out its more about cutting waste and won't necessarily impact capabilities or personnel.

There are tons of opportunities to cut spending in the military and at the same time grow the military.
 
Nothing but a lovefest for Rubio and Cruz on Fox this morning.
 
I don't understand how everyone is proclaiming that Cruz won this debate. Objectively, he didn't say anything worthwhile or have any moments. He did get the most speaking time though.
 
I don't understand how everyone is proclaiming that Cruz won this debate. Objectively, he didn't say anything worthwhile or have any moments. He did get the most speaking time though.

This is because Rubio and Cruz are the targeted people to pump up. Rubio is their establishment pick. Cruz is their primary source to syphon Rand's support and dilute his message. All of the fake "libertarian" outlets like Glenn Beck all support Cruz because he is a Pied Piper. He's the one saying what some libertarians want to hear, but wouldn't actually go through with it, that's why these outlets are choosing Cruz over Rand. They don't want real change, they are just intentionally steering the support in the wrong direction.
 
Rubo and Cruz are the biggest threat. As much as we feel Rand destroyed Marco, it just sounds like most people want the big spending and wars. It's pathetic.

The good thing about Rubio is that he's an utter jackass. He'll do something strikingly stupid soon enough, and it will cost him dearly.

Cruz will not, though. Cruz will be in this as long as he wants to be in this. I'm not sure what we can do about him. He's entirely unelectable, but I feel as though the base my go for him in primaries and caucuses. I just hope he struggles with GOTV aspects of politics.
 
This is because Rubio and Cruz are the targeted people to pump up. Rubio is their establishment pick. Cruz is their primary source to syphon Rand's support and dilute his message. All of the fake "libertarian" outlets like Glenn Beck all support Cruz because he is a Pied Piper. He's the one saying what some libertarians want to hear, but wouldn't actually go through with it, that's why these outlets are choosing Cruz over Rand. They don't want real change, they are just intentionally steering the support in the wrong direction.

Why do people think Cruz is fake? His record falls in line with his rhetoric. He has his own beliefs. They're closer to ours than anyone else, but the differences between us are significant. Why assume he is lying and not saying exactly what he actually thinks?
 
Cruz is their primary source to syphon Rand's support and dilute his message. All of the fake "libertarian" outlets like Glenn Beck all support Cruz because he is a Pied Piper.

THIS. Remember that Israel event everyone but Rand attended (he wasn't invited) earlier this year and it came out that Sheldon A. said that if Paul performs well in the polls they will just run Cruz to steal his base?
 
He's a big government neocon who believes we need to be everywhere all the time. That means he is a fake.

First of all, he is not a neocon. Second of all, he may be an interventionist. When has he claimed to be a non-interventionist? What is fake about him? Doesn't he actually just have a different foreign policy position than us?

If we think that he just spouting our rhetoric while actually harboring secret, nefarious, plans, we'll get no where. Eventually Rand will challenge him on the issues in which we differ, and Rand will win because that is what Rand does.
 
Back
Top