Caught red-handed: Ron Paul votes not counted in NH district

[RonPaulFTFW]

http://www.peacechicken.com/2008/01/09/caught-red-handed-ron-paul-votes-not-counted-in-nh-district/

 

[Ira Aten]

One thing is certain. Unless Ron Paul's campaign demands a re-count, you can bet they won't be getting any ten million dollar money bombs again.

We MUST have these re-counted. Hell, there is another video on YOUTUBE showing Ron Paul winning, if you add up the talley on the document:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8xgWjFe1cE

Have you seen this video????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

[ssmoler]

So I'm a little confused - is this claim actually true? Is it a fact that someone involved in handling the votes admitted that there were 31 votes casted for Paul in Sutton? And why was he "forced" to admit it, forced by his own morality? Regardless of whether this was rigged or accidental, if this is true how can anyone actually believe any of these results? How is this now getting more media attention?

 

[frasu]

One thing is certain. Unless Ron Paul's campaign demands a re-count, you can bet they won't be getting any ten million dollar money bombs again.

We MUST have these re-counted. Hell, there is another video on YOUTUBE showing Ron Paul winning, if you add up the talley on the document:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8xgWjFe1cE

Have you seen this video????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

that spreadsheet was wrong, it had the columns messed up but it was corrected the next day...

 

[liberty_Forever]

So I'm a little confused - is this claim actually true? Is it a fact that someone involved in handling the votes admitted that there were 31 votes casted for Paul in Sutton?

Yes, this is true. It was confirmed by Bev Harris of Black Box Voting. Sutton county retracted and said Ron Paul got 31 votes, not zero. Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.

 

[Berri]

So I'm a little confused - is this claim actually true? Is it a fact that someone involved in handling the votes admitted that there were 31 votes casted for Paul in Sutton? And why was he "forced" to admit it, forced by his own morality? Regardless of whether this was rigged or accidental, if this is true how can anyone actually believe any of these results? How is this now getting more media attention?

Yes very true, when Sutton county got busted in omitting Ron Paul's votes it only took one phone call for them to admit it, they shit themselves at being busted. Sutton county omitted 100% of Ron Paul votes, 100% ommission is not human error, imagine if you add up all the other counties (it would be ludicrous for only one county to do this, what would be the point, this is vote fraud) Now do you see why we are ALL CALLING FOR A RECOUNT! We want every vote and everyone accountable.

 

[rg123]

that spreadsheet was wrong, it had the columns messed up but it was corrected the next day...

Man I dont know those results look just like the cnn debate poll that was deleted this past summer.
Why should we think that the online polls are wrong. We all vote once its the Ron Paul rule. I dont believe it no one supports John McCain he is the AMNESTY KING along with Ted wind bag Kennedy

 

[Sandra]

I can attest there is NO way that error could have been made accidentally in a hand count. Several people check and double check ballot numbers to make sure the count is the same. Also each candidate's total is marked in it's own place. To leave out one candidate out of eight is deliberate.

 

[Daantje757]

Voter fraud being discussed on the Alex Jones show right now, with Bev Harris coming up with some interesting stuff.

 

[rg123]

I can attest there is NO way that error could have been made accidentally in a hand count. Several people check and double check ballot numbers to make sure the count is the same. Also each candidate's total is marked in it's own place. To leave out one candidate out of eight is deliberate.

Agreed

 

[Molly1]

Here's what I've figured out about recount so far:

DEADLINE FOR FILING FOR A RECOUNT: FIVE O'CLOCK TOMORROW, FRIDAY, JAN 11, 2008

THE COST WILL DEPEND ON THE CANDIDATE FILING.

IT WILL COST MORE IF THE CANDIDATE GOT LESS VOTES

THEY WILL KNOW THE COST FOR EVERY CANDIDATE BY CANDIDATE LATER TODAY

IF A RECOUNT IS REQUESTED THEY WILL RECOUNT ALL THE VOTES FOR ALL CANDIDATES IN THAT PARTY



What I think we really need is a recount of both parties. What if votes are being siphoned off both sides electronically? That means a candidate from each party has to request it. Any candidate on the ballot can request it, but the less votes you got, the more it will cost. Call Kucinich or Mike Gravel for democratic side recount.

 

[brumans]

If the deadline is tomorrow then the Granny Warriors chip-in is worthless.