Caucuses good, primaries bad

[JohnM]

Someone has probably already posted this, but I can't help noticing. . .

Primaries

New Hampshire --- 7.65%
Michigan------------ 6.27%
South Carolina ---- 3.62%
Florida --------------3.23%

Caucuses

Lousisiana --- Possible 1st place?
Maine -------- 18.69% - Possible 1st place in delegates
Nevada ------ 13.73%
Iowa --------- 9.96%

Dr Paul has done significantly better in caucuses than primaries all over the U.S. Even the best primary is not as good as the worst caucus.

What does this tell us?

 

[Liberty_TN]

It makes me despise Diebold.

 

[FreeTraveler]

It means that people who are committed to being active in the political process are more informed than people who get up, go to the polls, and pull a handle based on name recognition. No real news there.

 

[ItsTime]

bingo

It means that people who are committed to being active in the political process are more informed than people who get up, go to the polls, and pull a handle based on name recognition. No real news there.

 

[Lois]

Voter Fraud.

 

[VoluntaryMan]

It means that the average primary voter is twice as stupid as the average caucus voter.