Candace Owens is a PROBLEM For Erika Kirk & TPUSA

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

He's right but what's with his bizarre theatrics.

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

Please Candace, don't stop.

Fuck.

 

[unknown]

It was this post that drove Erika to demand, the very next day, that Candace stop.

Post in thread 'RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah'

Dec 11, 2025

WTF

Sounds like disinfo, not from Candace, but from her source.

He walked into the planning session?



" BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Just EXPOSED the US MILITARY MEETING Where They PLANNED Charlie Kirk’s ASSASSINATION – You Won’t Believe Who Was There! (Harpole & Neff) (FULL CLIP)

A 35-year military whistleblower (Harry Myers) who’s been running for his life since exposing cartel–U.S. command tunnels in 1990, accidentally walked straight into what he believes was the FINAL PLANNING MEETING for Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Date: September 9th, 2025 Location...

• unknown

I wouldn't be surprised if Candace uses the Erika meeting as an out.

Not because Candace is a fraud but because there's a part of her that's sincerely scared by this evil cabal.

 

[jmdrake]

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

 

[Invisible Man]

For a candidate to receive donations from a group called the Anti-Zionist American PAC would be political suicide. This is so obvious that it makes me wonder if that's the point.

 

[acptulsa]

For a candidate to receive donations from a group called the Anti-Zionist American PAC would be political suicide. This is so obvious that it makes me wonder if that's the point.

Third rails don't last forever. The political calculus is based on many variables. The earth is shifting.

 

[unknown]

No corroboration yet.

Apparently, Candace said re: Charlie's statement, "they" are going to kill me, was actually a reference to the Leftys...



Really hope she didn't say this.

 

[unknown]

This isn't true.

Atleast, it's not the full truth.

What about Frank Turek.


"BREAKING: Candace Owens says Erika Kirk admitted during their meeting that she was Mistaken — Charlie Kirk, DID SAY “They are going to kill me” the day before his assassination.

"Erika explained that she had only checked Charlie’s iMessages when making that statement. After later reviewing his Signal/Telegram messages, she found the messages there.

"Although Candace did not personally see or verify the messages, Erika Kirk confirmed that Dan Flood had also received a similar message from Charlie, specifying “The Left is going to kill me.”"



"Candace Owens reveals the persons who texted Charlie Kirk saying “They’re going to kill me” the night before he died was allegedly Andrew Kolvet and Dan Flood

“I got that directly from Andrew Kolvet. He asked me to keep it off record. I would have kept it off record if Erika didn’t imply I lied. We have a scenario now where either Andrew Kolvet lied or Erika lied…”

 

[unknown]

In quoting the texts, Frank doesn't say "the Left".

So, Charlie only specified "the Left" to Dan Flood?

Who is Dan Flood, TPUSA's "Security Director".

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

"1. Conformation of Charlie communicating with Andrew Kolvet and Dan Flood saying that Charlie was in danger:

-Andrew Kolver: "They are going to kill me"

- Dan Flood: "The LEFT? is going to kill me?" unconfirmed if Charlie said "the LEFT or THEY?""

 

[Anti Globalist]

Why do I get the feeling that Candace will come out eventually and say that no foreign government is involved in Kirk's assassination?

 

[unknown]

"Look at what Erika did to Candace.

The story was that some people told her that Charlie had texted them, saying, before the day he was killed, “I think they are going to assassinate me.”

However, they never showed her the text or provided proof, and Candace herself did not have that text.

Then the wording changed to “The left is going to kill him.”

You can see the move they made on Candace, they played her.

If they believed Candace had the original text, they would not have changed the content of the message.

The original version was “I think they are going to kill me,” and at that time they claimed they didn’t know who Charlie was referring to.

Later, Erika asked Candace whether she had the text or any proof of it. Candace said she did not.

Suddenly, after learning Candace didn’t have the text, the story changed again—now they claim Charlie said “the left is going to assassinate him,” even though earlier they said they didn’t know who he meant.

That shift alone raises serious questions. It makes it look like Charlie may have been referring to Zionists originally, and now the narrative is being redirected to “the left,” something they previously claimed they could not identify.

And who says call logs can’t be changed?
Take your own phone, you can delete calls easily.

Only a forensic analysis from the phone company can provide real call logs. Not the FBI’s summary, not Erika’s account, and not whoever is conducting this case.

I don’t believe the call logs that have been presented.

If Tyler had a competent lawyer, they could demand the actual carrier records and signal communications for anyone associated with this case.

If those phone numbers were released, the public could independently verify parts of those call logs, which could genuinely help uncover the truth."