Can you keep up with the lies?

Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
14
a frontal attack on Lou Dobbs by Dem Now....
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/12/5/fbi_statistics_show_anti_latino_hate
(Probably best to listen or watch stream, link is on web site.)

From the transcript:
It’s worth saying that in addition to the Reconquista theory, the Aztlan theory, he has pushed very heavily the idea that there is a North American Union, an entity which is planned by Bush and other neoconservatives, which would merge the countries of Canada, Mexico and the United States. He has pushed this on his website, with polls asking people are they concerned. He has mentioned it repeatedly on the air. At this point, eighteen state legislatures have passed resolutions condemning the so-called North American Union. One small problem: there is no such thing. This is a figment of the imaginations of people on the radical right. The theory essentially comes from the John Birch Society and related kinds of organizations. You know, it’s utterly bogus. But it’s the same idea as the Aztlan theory. The Mexicans, the Canadians, in this case, are out to do us in.


AMY GOODMAN: And how the Minutemen tie into this, if they do, Mark Potok?


MARK POTOK: Well, the Minutemen, in a lot of ways, and the vigilante groups, in general, have been transmitters of theories like this. You know, the Aztlan theory, for instance, was pushed very heavily early on by a hate group called American Border Patrol. This idea that Mexico and native-born Chicanos in the United States were involved together in this plot then made its way out into the Minutemen groups and eventually landed on Lou Dobbs, on any number of AM radio shows. It’s been talked about by US congressmen (note: this is a reference to RP). And so, it’s become a part of this debate, and yet it has nothing to do with what’s actually going on.


And this is really the point we’ve tried to make with Dobbs, is that, you know, you are not contributing in any way; you are detracting from any kind of democratic discussion of immigration.
 
Last edited:
Maybe they should look at this GOVERNMENT website.
http://www.infratrans.gov.ab.ca/2760.htm

These people are making themselves look like fools telling us all this is a "conspiracy theory". Next they`ll be telling us the sun will not rise tomorrow and you know what? a lot of fools will believe them.
 
These people are making themselves look like fools telling us all this is a "conspiracy theory". Next they`ll be telling us the sun will not rise tomorrow and you know what? a lot of fools will believe them.
What is worse is that they link NAU detractors with Ron Paul with the radical right with the Minutemen with vigilante groups with hate groups and with detracting from democratic discussion.

This is far more than calling the NAU a figment of the imagination, this is about attacking anyone who is a NAU detractor. NAU detractors are being put into a box and negatively labelled. Didn't the administration just do this with "militant" islam a few years ago?
 
Did you see what that coward Keith Olbermann did to Lou Dobbs? He did his usual disgusting slander calling him a racist(his wife is mexican) and comparing him to Jospeh McCarthy. Then he says that he is a hippocrite because, his daughters jump horses and mexicans clean those places...WTF do you want him to not let his daughters do that? Should he also not eat produce? Or go to public Parks?


How does he get away with this stuff? He is the only person it the world who could actually make me feel bad for Billo.
 
Did you see what that coward Keith Olbermann did to Lou Dobbs? He did his usual disgusting slander calling him a racist(his wife is mexican) and comparing him to Jospeh McCarthy. Then he says that he is a hippocrite because, his daughters jump horses and mexicans clean those places...WTF do you want him to not let his daughters do that? Should he also not eat produce? Or go to public Parks?

Usual disgusting slander? I'll admit that Olbermann really blew it out of proportion, but it's far from a pattern of "usual disgusting slander." I think all parties in this case were being equally stupid. The LA Times reporter was stupid for insinuating that the debate was tailored specifically to address Dobb's agenda, and Dobbs was being stupid in the way he bristled and blustered about it, saying things like "poor, whiney liberals" and "you're a coward for not coming on my show" like something Billo would say. And Keith was being stupid for bringing Dobb's family into the issue, and the "showjumping" issue was actually kind of weak in general.
 
Back
Top