Propelling competition is the most pro-liberty vote in 2012.
I believe Ron Paul agrees with the OP. He had this to say about writing in his name in 2008:
"I don’t think that’s very productive. Supporters can do it, of course, but in most of the states it won’t count. And if they can change the rules in a primary and not count all the votes, imagine what they could do with write-in votes!"
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/21556.html
Later that year, he held a press conference to encourage third party voting, and explained that it's pretty much the only vote that might bring about the competition necessary to break the duopoly.
(9/10/08)
Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq8Q3H5WZm4
Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q-JVevYyMQ
Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPrSgBQFBFM
Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCVtTiQ9KsA
Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ2opCJYnh0
Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvvpDMO7hA0
Part 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3nLZcAdmJM
Part 9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7p_OPr3nsw
Why the complaints about the Libertarian party being eligible for public funds? They have to work within the system that currently exists, just as Ron Paul has when, for example, he earmarks money to reimburse his constituents a portion of taxes paid.
Considering that each presidential nominee from a "major" party can become eligible for over $20 million in public grants, we should all be thrilled at the possibility of depriving future Democrats and Republicans of 1/3 of that amount! They both received $18,248,300 just to hold their sham conventions. Who can't support taking over $12 million away from the dems and repubs?
A 5% Libertarian vote in 2012 means competition in 2016, and positively benefits the liberty movement. It means debating real issues in 2016. It would force the 2 parties to alter their behavior to earn our votes. It HURTS the duopoly! Writing in Paul's name may make you personally feel great, but then what? Ron Paul said it's not about him, it's shouldn't be about you either.
Still, I will be interested to hear what kind of totals Ron Paul receives in the few states where his totals will (allegedly) be counted. No offense to those writing him in - I just don't trust the officials to take any care with the counting of write-in votes, or to announce the count any time soon. Nor do I believe Ron Paul's vote totals will ever be known or discussed by anyone but us.
I believe Ron Paul agrees with the OP. He had this to say about writing in his name in 2008:
"I don’t think that’s very productive. Supporters can do it, of course, but in most of the states it won’t count. And if they can change the rules in a primary and not count all the votes, imagine what they could do with write-in votes!"
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/21556.html
Later that year, he held a press conference to encourage third party voting, and explained that it's pretty much the only vote that might bring about the competition necessary to break the duopoly.
(9/10/08)
Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq8Q3H5WZm4
Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q-JVevYyMQ
Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPrSgBQFBFM
Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCVtTiQ9KsA
Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ2opCJYnh0
Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvvpDMO7hA0
Part 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3nLZcAdmJM
Part 9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7p_OPr3nsw
Why the complaints about the Libertarian party being eligible for public funds? They have to work within the system that currently exists, just as Ron Paul has when, for example, he earmarks money to reimburse his constituents a portion of taxes paid.
Considering that each presidential nominee from a "major" party can become eligible for over $20 million in public grants, we should all be thrilled at the possibility of depriving future Democrats and Republicans of 1/3 of that amount! They both received $18,248,300 just to hold their sham conventions. Who can't support taking over $12 million away from the dems and repubs?
A 5% Libertarian vote in 2012 means competition in 2016, and positively benefits the liberty movement. It means debating real issues in 2016. It would force the 2 parties to alter their behavior to earn our votes. It HURTS the duopoly! Writing in Paul's name may make you personally feel great, but then what? Ron Paul said it's not about him, it's shouldn't be about you either.
Still, I will be interested to hear what kind of totals Ron Paul receives in the few states where his totals will (allegedly) be counted. No offense to those writing him in - I just don't trust the officials to take any care with the counting of write-in votes, or to announce the count any time soon. Nor do I believe Ron Paul's vote totals will ever be known or discussed by anyone but us.