Can We At Least Admit (Brown election)

[sofia]

Scott Brown is now up 9 points. Righton. Obama should QUIT stumpin for his candidates..they keep losing when he comes around. tones

one would think that after losing his in person bid for Chicago Olympics...losing his in person bid for crey Deeds in VA...and losing his in person bid for John Corzine in NJ.......that he'd stay home...

but he s such an arrogant bastard with a God complex

 

[parocks]

I guess you are entirely unfamiliar with the political process.

If Scott Brown wins, between now and November 2010, Scott Brown and Ron Paul will be voting on the same or very similar legislation.

I will bet you that Scott Brown and Ron Paul will be voting the same way more than half the time.

Will you take my bet?

For a little background, Democrats from now until November 2010 will be trying to pass a wide variety of laws that the people do not want. Ron Paul will be voting against those laws. Scott Brown, also, would be voting against those laws, more often than not

Do you doubt this?

The people here who recommend a vote for Scott Brown on Tuesday, January 19
understand that Brown would be voting the same way as Ron Paul throughout 2010 more often than not.

They also understand that Coakley would be voting the opposite way as Ron Paul throughout 2010 more often than not.

They also understand that Kennedy has 0% chance of winning.

Do you understand these things?

Or do you have something else to say, completely irrelevant to the way Ron Paul votes, Scott Brown would vote and Martha Coakley would vote?

That's what these Senators and Representatives do, you know, vote.

You do know that Scott Brown's term would be up the same time as Obama's. They would both be facing reelection at the same time.

Mr Parocks, what you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul

 

[tonesforjonesbones]

Parocks..they don't think things through...they rebel ..that's all. tones

 

[tangent4ronpaul]

The people here who recommend a vote for Scott Brown on Tuesday, January 19
understand that Brown would be voting the same way as Ron Paul throughout 2010 more often than not.

They also understand that Coakley would be voting the opposite way as Ron Paul throughout 2010 more often than not.

They also understand that Kennedy has 0% chance of winning.

Do you understand these things?

I was going to stick up for you with that exact argument - you beat me to it

To re-emphasize: Coakley would vote with Ron Paul ZERO percent of the time!

+1

-t

 

[Kludge]

I will bet you that Scott Brown and Ron Paul will be voting the same way more than half the time.

Will you take my bet?

That´s ridiculous. The majority of the time, Dems and Reps vote the same way. I´ll give the same bet for Coakley voting with Paul more than 50% @ up to $1000.

 

[Kludge]

To re-emphasize: Coakley would vote with Ron Paul ZERO percent of the time!

I´d bet $10,000 against only because I can´t find anymore to stow away for a year.

 

[tangent4ronpaul]

Have you noticed that every piece of major legislation, excepting fed budgets and naming post offices has come down on a completely partison or almost so vote since Obama got elected?

-t

 

[parocks]

We really only have to be making these arguments for less than 24 hours, but the argument "Scott Brown will vote with Ron Paul more often than Coakley would" might be the strongest argument we have.

I was going to stick up for you with that exact argument - you beat me to it

To re-emphasize: Coakley would vote with Ron Paul ZERO percent of the time!

+1

-t

 

[cindy25]

before the Kennedy's nearly every senator from Mass. was a Republican

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Senators_from_Massachusetts

 

[parocks]

before the Kennedy's nearly every senator from Mass. was a Republican

That's pretty much true.

 

[randolphfuller]

As long as people with the freedom movement keep voting for stooges like Brown, the Republican Party will keep putting them forward.That sort of thinking brought us eight years of George Bush. Those committed to freedom should vote for Joe Kennedy. If he should get enough votes that it may appear that his presence on the ballot led to Brown's defeat, so much the better. In any case Coakley is preferable as in the debates she said she favored the removal of all American troops from Afghanistan now!! Brown is nothing but a neoconservative tool and war monger, cut from the same cloth as Bush.

 

[ultimaonliner]

but he s [obama] such an arrogant bastard with a god complex

qft

 

[Pants]

I bet Ron Paul, Pelosi, Boxer, and McCain all vote together and agree about 50 to 75% of the time. There are always non-important legislation that we never hear about unless you are a C-Span Junkie. Like naming a post office after a famous local celebrity who lives in that town, building monuments, naming a street after a senator or congressman, allowing a moment of silence in the chamber in memory of Ft. Hood victims.. Maybe expanding a national park by 5 acres, Changing the name of a national park, combing and cosolidating two national forests. .. Not trying to be a smart A$$ but just saying.. Usually low important stuff the media doesn't cover you need to count when talking about voting and agreeing with another member of Congress.. For that matter Obama agreed with Bush and voted with the Republicans about 55% of the time. That is when he decided show up to vote that day.

That´s ridiculous. The majority of the time, Dems and Reps vote the same way. I´ll give the same bet for Coakley voting with Paul more than 50% @ up to $1000.

 

[devil21]

that it'd be funny to have a Repub represent Massachusetts in the Senate...in Teddy's old seat no less

No, because no R can win in Mass without the absolute blessing of those in control. If an R wins then it means two things:

1) He's already assured to be enough of a RINO to make Lindsey Graham look like Taft.

2) Acknowledgement that the "rinse and repeat cycle" has started and it's almost the R's turn to start raping and pillaging again.

 

[Pants]

I am trying to figure out if this is "a game" or the real deal? I was hoping the Republicans would learn from the loss, and come back as TRUE Republicans. On the other hand I have seen enough of the dems and would rather see Brown take the seat and put a stop to this madness. Brown doesn't seem like a knight in shining armour.. At least we know the Dems no longer have the votes to pass Health Care & Cap and Trade should Brown win. But one thing is certain if Brown wins and the Dems pull something funny like try to pass Health Care with 51 votes.. They will be tarnished for decades. This election is not about Brown's credentials. it is a referendum against Obama and the Dem's Socialist policy.

No, because no R can win in Mass without the absolute blessing of those in control. If an R wins then it means two things:

1) He's already assured to be enough of a RINO to make Lindsey Graham look like Taft.

2) Acknowledgement that the "rinse and repeat cycle" has started and it's almost the R's turn to start raping and pillaging again.

 

[devil21]

I am trying to figure out if this is "a game" or the real deal? I was hoping the Republicans would learn from the loss, and come back as TRUE Republicans. On the other hand I have seen enough of the dems and would rather see Brown take the seat and put a stop to this madness. Brown doesn't seem like a knight in shining armour.. At least we know the Dems no longer have the votes to pass Health Care & Cap and Trade should Brown win. But one thing is certain if Brown wins and the Dems pull something funny like try to pass Health Care with 51 votes.. They will be tarnished for decades. This election is not about Brown's credentials. it is a referendum against Obama and the Dem's Socialist policy.

Do you think they care? I stated this in another thread and Ill say it on this one too. Brown will never have to live up to his campaign promise of being the official blocker of Obamacare. It's a done deal already and Haiti sure is making for a great distraction.

The gov't NEEDS Obamacare in some iteration, just as long as all the tax hikes are included. It will pass one way or another. The federal government can't afford for it to fail.

 

[0zzy]

I like Brown's media team. Send them to Rand's side.