Have you ever met anyone that has made a decision that you did not anticipate? Have you ever met anyone that changed their decision at the last moment? What would happen if Dr. Paul made a statement that he has 1,300 delegates?
The point is, no one knows anything until AFTER the delegates vote. I want and still holding out for a Paul nomination, but regardless, do you plan on accepting the status quo and their actions or will you continue to confront these actions?
Fine, if you want to hold out hope for a miracle...but with Ron Paul himself saying that he will have "upwards of 500" supporters, still holding out hope for there being 1144...or 644 more than Ron Paul himself (who would have FAR more information than any of us) is silly.
Especially when it would mean that not just those 644, but a full 944 would have to go against the rules of bound delegates (a rule that Ron Paul used in his e-mail) for it to happen.
Sorry, but it is just not going to happen and there is noshame in accepting it. Facing reality does not make you a bad Ron Paul supporter. HE has faced the reality. And that reality is that he has NOT been getting the delegates at recent state conventions. Romney's campaign is not stupid. They know almost every one of their delegates. They have checked up on them. I am not referring to the ones in Massachusetts or Nevada that are bound to him but are clearly Paul supporters. I am talking about every one of the 1100 or so that thereal2012delegatecount is giving to Romney. His campaign knows these are solidly for Romney. And everyone knows (or should know) that Romney will get virtually EVERY superdelegate. So he really only needs about 1010 delegates. a quarter of those from from slates which DEFINITELY don't have stealth Paul supporters on them. Counting superdelegates and slates, to keep him under 1144, well over 60% of his delegates would have to be stealth. AND willing to go against the binding. (Unlike Nevada which has already said they wouldn't.)
You don't have to LIKE it, but you really should accept it. It is over. If this was a football game, Ron Paul is down by 29 points with a minute to go and Romney has the ball. Ron Paul's e-mail last week was basically saying "Well...we didn't win. I am not going to walk off the field before the clock runs out. But at this point, I am not going to call time outs to stop the clock just to ge the ball back with 12 seconds."
Or, if you are not a football fan but still a sports fan, Ron Paul is a basketball team down by 17 with 34 seconds left. And his letter stated that he would no longer be fouling the other team to stop the clock and put them on the free throw line. Because there is nothing worse than watching a game when a team does that whe there is no way they can win. Not even Reggie Miller playing against the Knicks could overcome the lead that Romney has right now.
The BEST move for the movement is to continue supporting Ron Paul up to the Convention...hope that he gets two more states to at least be eligible and give a speech, but also looking ahead to the FUTURE.