California crime craziness

Anti Federalist said:
WRT to the comments at 2:00.

Bullshit. The memory in the ECM or BCM will record times when the doors are locked or unlocked. Any shop's comprehensive scanner can read that data in seconds.

They'd use it convict US though
Click to expand...

Giving thieves a pass merely because a door might not have been locked is bullshit in any case.

Like the guy said, it's just a stat-juking dodge. #AnarchoTyranny
 
Occam's Banana said:
Anarcho-Tyranny

Why can't they stop this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8tTDooX13Q
{Decoy Voice | 30 October 2023}

On the 10 Freeway in Los Angeles, CA a robbery goes down in broad daylight with four masked individuals going through a car that got run off the road. But this uptick in brazen crime is not limited to LA in California, but similar to what we have seen in New York City, NY. So what is our leadership doing to protect us and prevent this from happening? Not much apparently.

Click to expand...


Car Crash Robbery A New Trend?
https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/car-crash-robbery-a-new-trend:1
{Actual justice Warrior | 01 November 2023}

In this video I discuss a Hit & Run style robbery out of California that is the consequence of a few troubling trends in the state that have gone unpunished for far too long.

 
Occam's Banana said:
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1718990435886956871
Soros-backed DA Pamela Price was just the victim of a car burglary in her own district of Oakland. The thugs stole her laptop and smashed her windows.

The DA called the cops and waited an hour. They didn’t come. She was forced to file a report online like everyone else.

Here she is in July saying she feels safe in Oakland and mocking safety concerns:
Click to expand...


[...]
Click to expand...

Woke Oakland DA Gets Robbed
https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/woke-oakland-da-gets-robbed:a
{Actual Justice Warrior | 10 November 2023}

In this video I discuss the recent burglary of Alameda County DA Pamela Price, the recent positive history in terms of crime in Oakland & the broader recall campaign against her.

 
"Failed Progressive Utopia"

Catchy, but am I the only one who finds it just a bit repetitive?

I'm sure our prog friends would appreciate it if we were to do the obvious thing and just take its failure for granted. It's "Progressive Utopia". The failure part is implicit. It goes without saying. Had to happen.
 
california-crowder-this-is-totally-fine.jpg
 
I've been to that In-N-Out a few times. Always took a to go order. I used to cover that area for my employer. The locals always said to be careful and quick. Even my business associates were broken into pretty much nightly. They had an electrified razor wire fence that didn't deter them. Steel panels finally helped a bit.
 
Occam's Banana said:
Oakland Is COLLAPSING
https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/oakland-is-collapsing:e
{Actual Justice Warrior | 08 February 2024}

In this video I discuss the absolute disaster Oakland has become since they decided to defund their police department in response to the BLM riots.

Click to expand...

Is there a black female prosecutor who isn't like this? I really wonder if people could sue these assholes. They deliberately do NOT do their jobs. Surely must they have some legal obligation to do them. A murdered baby and the perps walk?!!!
 
susano said:
I really wonder if people could sue these assholes. They deliberately do NOT do their jobs. Surely must they have some legal obligation to do them.
Click to expand...

Nope.

Prosecutorial Immunity
https://ij.org/immunity-for-prosecutorial-conduct/
{Institute for Justice | undated}

“Prosecutorial immunity” is a judge-made doctrine that cloaks prosecutors in near-absolute immunity from suit. Under this doctrine, prosecutors cannot be sued for any actions related to their job as a prosecutor, no matter how egregious the behavior. For example, prosecutors cannot be sued for knowingly prosecuting an innocent person, withholding evidence of innocence, or even fabricating false evidence of guilt.

Prosecutorial immunity is an absolute shield against damages lawsuits for claims that arise from prosecutorial actions. Believing that the constant worry of lawsuits would impede prosecutors’ ability to do their job, in its 1976 decision Imbler v. Pachtman, the Supreme Court created this immunity to serve the “public trust” and ensure “the proper functioning of the criminal justice system.”

Instead, experience shows that this immunity enables prosecutors to disregard constitutional rights in order to pursue convictions. Examples of prosecutors escaping liability are ubiquitous in the United States. For example, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that a group of nurses could not sue Suffolk County prosecutors who hid evidence and engaged in other misconduct as a political favor.

Similarly, a Maryland court held in 2021 that a prosecutor could not be held personally accountable for withholding lab test results proving that a man jailed for allegedly flying with methamphetamines was in fact carrying only honey, just like he said. In both cases, prosecutors withheld the truth to serve their own interests, and they were never held to account for their violations.

Despite prosecutorial immunity’s fundamental flaw, there is only one carveout to this otherwise impervious protection: It does not shield prosecutors from being sued for actions that are not related to advocating for the prosecution, such as acting as an investigator or police detective. In other words, “the actions of a prosecutor are not absolutely immune merely because they are performed by a prosecutor.”

However, because the line between prosecutor and investigator can be difficult to identify and judges define prosecutorial conduct very broadly, this exception is rarely applied. And in the very few cases where courts do not grant prosecutorial immunity, prosecutors are afforded the additional protection of qualified immunity. This means that victims who overcome the steep hurdle of prosecutorial immunity must also show that the prosecutor’s behavior violated clearly established law before they will receive their day in court.
 
Occam's Banana said:
Nope.

Prosecutorial Immunity
https://ij.org/immunity-for-prosecutorial-conduct/
{Institute for Justice | undated}

“Prosecutorial immunity” is a judge-made doctrine that cloaks prosecutors in near-absolute immunity from suit. Under this doctrine, prosecutors cannot be sued for any actions related to their job as a prosecutor, no matter how egregious the behavior. For example, prosecutors cannot be sued for knowingly prosecuting an innocent person, withholding evidence of innocence, or even fabricating false evidence of guilt.

Prosecutorial immunity is an absolute shield against damages lawsuits for claims that arise from prosecutorial actions. Believing that the constant worry of lawsuits would impede prosecutors’ ability to do their job, in its 1976 decision Imbler v. Pachtman, the Supreme Court created this immunity to serve the “public trust” and ensure “the proper functioning of the criminal justice system.”

Instead, experience shows that this immunity enables prosecutors to disregard constitutional rights in order to pursue convictions. Examples of prosecutors escaping liability are ubiquitous in the United States. For example, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that a group of nurses could not sue Suffolk County prosecutors who hid evidence and engaged in other misconduct as a political favor.

Similarly, a Maryland court held in 2021 that a prosecutor could not be held personally accountable for withholding lab test results proving that a man jailed for allegedly flying with methamphetamines was in fact carrying only honey, just like he said. In both cases, prosecutors withheld the truth to serve their own interests, and they were never held to account for their violations.

Despite prosecutorial immunity’s fundamental flaw, there is only one carveout to this otherwise impervious protection: It does not shield prosecutors from being sued for actions that are not related to advocating for the prosecution, such as acting as an investigator or police detective. In other words, “the actions of a prosecutor are not absolutely immune merely because they are performed by a prosecutor.”

However, because the line between prosecutor and investigator can be difficult to identify and judges define prosecutorial conduct very broadly, this exception is rarely applied. And in the very few cases where courts do not grant prosecutorial immunity, prosecutors are afforded the additional protection of qualified immunity. This means that victims who overcome the steep hurdle of prosecutorial immunity must also show that the prosecutor’s behavior violated clearly established law before they will receive their day in court.
Click to expand...

SCOTUS decisions can be reversed and that needs to happen. What's happening is so bizarre that it's not even mentioned in that article which focuses on going after innocent people. In these case we have them choosing to do nothing and that should rise to "show that the prosecutor’s behavior violated clearly established law. Someone needs to start this process of a lawsuit and settle this bullshit. There are lots of people who have had family murdered and commie prosecutors let the perps walk.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Swordsmyth
Trump Slashes D.C Gun Permit Wait List as Part of Violent Crime Crackdown
Replies
9
Views
153
PAF
PAF
Occam's Banana
Blue city crime craziness
3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
19K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Swordsmyth
Trump Admin Removes Advisory From HHS Website Labeling Gun Violence A Health Crisis
Replies
0
Views
34
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Occam's Banana
Red state crime craziness
Replies
2
Views
603
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
PAF
Domestic Militarization Is Trump’s Economic Plan
Replies
3
Views
108
nikcers
nikcers
Back
Top