Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,674
Stop.
Just stop right there.
Lord Almighty.
No shit...honestly.
Stop.
Just stop right there.
Lord Almighty.
Also, Economic Incentive to own a vehicle that is as fuel efficient and "enviornment friendly" as possible.
Anything beyond this is about Control, as stated. How long until "we know where you are" changes to "we will tell you where you are allowed and not allowed to travel"? That, unfortunately will be the inevitable next step, and it may not be enforced by Government alone, but by your Insurance Provider and any who stand to benefit from telling you where you can and can not go. That will evolve into "the new norm". I cant go to your house, the company that I took out a loan from to buy my car says you live in an area that has too high of a crime rate. My employer says I cant visit you because you live next door to a child molestor or drug dealer or witch or Libertarian or Ron Paul Supporter or anyone they deem unworthy. That is the Control that people need to realize and reject. That is the ultimate cost of surrendering your Privacy. Every single action or thought is subject to the approval of someone else, regardless if you consider it to be "right" or "wrong" which are, as always, Subjective to someone elses Terms and Conditions.
Seems fairly free market.
Government owns the roads, they charge you to use them (per mile fee).
Doesn't that make sense?
This is already happening in the UK.
And our side will join the fascists in proclaiming that this is, somehow, "free market" policies.
Angela used Libertarian with the capital L, connoting the Libertarian Party.
"Currently motorists are paying to use their cars on the roads while they are actually driving their cars," Orcutt wrote to Carlson. "At the same time, they are paying for bike lanes because there is no gas tax -- or any transportation tax -- generated by the act of riding a bike on the roadways."
Orcutt concluded, "I do think that bicyclists need to start paying for the roads they ride on rather than make motorists pay."
Rest assured comrade, they will tax and control that as well.
Just give it a little time.
There is no hiding from this, there is no "out", there is no black market, no alternative currency, that is going to save you.
This whole system, and I'm not just talking about gas taxes, I'm talking about the whole bloody mess, will find you.
We have two choices: comply or resist.
There will be no fence sitting in this coming conflict.
A tax on bikes
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/mar/07/nation/la-na-nn-bike-tax-northwest-20130307
Can't be.
The LP never solved anything. The only time it's ever involved in a solution is when it's watering its principles down to suit someone like Bob Barr.
Good Lord. Seems the only way out is to leave, but to where?
"I do think that bicyclists need to start paying for the roads they ride on rather than make motorists pay."
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/mar/07/nation/la-na-nn-bike-tax-northwest-20130307
This is actually a Libertarian solution.
Whats happened to you??
First its freaking out that anti-vaccine people are nuts..
then its Vitamin C isnt good for you..
Now its a pay-per-mile tax is libertarian??
Who are you and what have you done with the real Angelatc???
Do you think you would get free roads in a libertarian society?Isn't it obvious? Lets say the roads were owned by a private owner (libertarian), that owner would allow you to use their roads for a toll or a fee. IT could be a toll road or it could be pay per mile (with new technology this makes traditional toll booth obsolete). This is what is being proposed.
I don't understand what the objection here isDo you think you would get free roads in a libertarian society?
it still makes sense.The problem is the roads ARENT owned by a private owner.
This is actually a Libertarian solution.
Seems fairly free market. Government owns the roads, they charge you to use them (per mile fee). Doesn't that make sense?