leonster
Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2007
- Messages
- 361
Just IMO, but Herman Cain is not bad, and if he was the nominee I'd probably vote for him in the general election. He's much preferable to Obama.
You'll see on here, there's several of the Republican candidates we really dislike--Perry chief among them (will say or do anything to get elected but isn't actually conservative in the slightest... many of us think he's kinda scummy, both on policy and personally), Santorum (irrelevant but severely, dangerously misguided) as well, and might as well lump Romney in there (not *personally* a bad guy, but again not at all conservative, and flip-floppy to boot).
Bachmann and Gingrich... some of us grudgingly accept, some not so much. They've recently adopted many of Ron Paul's major talking points for popularity, but I don't think they really mean them.
Cain, though... well, I'm sure someone somewhere on the board said negative things about him, but I don't really remember anything specific. Ahh, yes I do, come to think of it--about him having been high up in the Federal Reserve in the past--we're anti-Fed here. Overall though I'd say he's fairly respected, though not preferred, here. To me, he seems a decent guy, not a politician/blowhard (!), and refreshingly enough admits when he doesn't know something.
The thing is: Ron Paul doesn't have to admit that, b/c it's pretty rare for him to be unaware of any political issue and how it relates to liberty.
You'll see on here, there's several of the Republican candidates we really dislike--Perry chief among them (will say or do anything to get elected but isn't actually conservative in the slightest... many of us think he's kinda scummy, both on policy and personally), Santorum (irrelevant but severely, dangerously misguided) as well, and might as well lump Romney in there (not *personally* a bad guy, but again not at all conservative, and flip-floppy to boot).
Bachmann and Gingrich... some of us grudgingly accept, some not so much. They've recently adopted many of Ron Paul's major talking points for popularity, but I don't think they really mean them.
Cain, though... well, I'm sure someone somewhere on the board said negative things about him, but I don't really remember anything specific. Ahh, yes I do, come to think of it--about him having been high up in the Federal Reserve in the past--we're anti-Fed here. Overall though I'd say he's fairly respected, though not preferred, here. To me, he seems a decent guy, not a politician/blowhard (!), and refreshingly enough admits when he doesn't know something.
The thing is: Ron Paul doesn't have to admit that, b/c it's pretty rare for him to be unaware of any political issue and how it relates to liberty.
