Cain is finished, Perry is done, Paul is rising

Or RP can put Hannity on the spot by asking...

Where in the Constitution does it allow us to rule the world off the backs of the middle class through higher taxes and printing money?
Why do you, Hannity, support defending foreign borders and not ours?
Why do you, Hannity, advocate going into more debt which wars result in? Especially since most are I dunno - ILLEGAL.
Wars destroy military families and thousands upon thousands of innocent families are caught in collateral damage. Why are you and Santorum anti-family?
Wars should be congressionally declared. Are you against that? No. Then you support my foreign policy and economic policy. Thank you for the endorsement.

Throw the shit back in his face.
Has to be in spending terms.

Hannity approved the 1 trillion spending cut plan. The plan included bringing the troops home.
So if he approved the plan he's approving bringing the troops home?
 
Thread Title: I'd love to believe that. You'd never know it by what I'm hearing, but I'm pretty isolated.
 
I saw stick with what works best, stick with the economic plan.

I say this because that is the one area that Hannity disagrees on. If he has the time to explain the position that it would actually make us a stronger nation militarily, that we could use the Guard units for border patrol and national disaster assistance, and most importantly the TOLL to the men and women of the armed forces that must endure endless multiple deployments, then I believe he could make a point against a detractor of his policy. Especially if he frames it as in being the best way to SUPPORT the troops.

However, he could save it for a second interview. This policy is a big one though when dealing with Neo-Cons. If framed correctly it could be the sticking point that could change the whole game.
 
What was this in relation to?

When Paul asked all the other candidates about when reagen traded hostages for arms with Iran. Maddow said she loved how Ron Paul made all the other candidates squirm and that this was Ron Paul in all his awesomeness.
 
When Paul asked all the other candidates about when reagen traded hostages for arms with Iran. Maddow said she loved how Ron Paul made all the other candidates squirm and that this was Ron Paul in all his awesomeness.

Is she aware where Rand got his nuanced view of the 1964 civil rights act from?
 
Cain's got a pretty strong cult of personality going. I wouldn't dismiss him so quickly. The masses will cling onto him until he disgusts them to a level that becomes unbearable.

Unfortunately, this ^ is so true.
 
Cain's got a pretty strong cult of personality going. I wouldn't dismiss him so quickly. The masses will cling onto him until he disgusts them to a level that becomes unbearable.

You mean apples and oranges didn't make him become unbearable?
 
Cain has no chance. I heard on the radio today (and this is in Australia) that he has 2 (!!) staffers in New Hampshire, and apparently they don't even do much. haha So he's all hype, no ground game. (they also mentioned he was a joke candidate) Anyone got more info about this?
 
You mean apples and oranges didn't make him become unbearable?


Apples and Oranges you say?
apples-and-oranges1.jpg




I raise you:
Bananas1.jpg
 
Cain has no chance. I heard on the radio today (and this is in Australia) that he has 2 (!!) staffers in New Hampshire, and apparently they don't even do much. haha So he's all hype, no ground game. (they also mentioned he was a joke candidate) Anyone got more info about this?

pretty much sums it up. as i stated earlier his campaign is fake and it's planned that he will bow out and endorse romney
 
You mean apples and oranges didn't make him become unbearable?

Remember that a cult of personality casts a reality distortion field around the subject. It will take a few more stupid outbursts before the field goes down.
 
The establishment has already nominated Romney, now they are just flailing away for a pseudo-rebel so they can say we had a choice. What little I pay attention to the media, I've heard the talking heads speculating a Perry rebound. They are just fishing for someone, but, like the Fed, they have run out of ammunition.
 
The establishment has already nominated Romney, now they are just flailing away for a pseudo-rebel so they can say we had a choice. What little I pay attention to the media, I've heard the talking heads speculating a Perry rebound. They are just fishing for someone, but, like the Fed, they have run out of ammunition.

And yet some of the establishment is breaking ranks over the past 72 hours.

1. Mon, limbaugh endorses Paul's economic plan, quoting politico
2. Tues, hannity interviews Paul and also endorses Paul's plan
3. Later tues, fox news says Paul's plan is one most republicans will go for
4. Paul has best debate performance ever
5. Paul has awesome interview this morning, wed
6. Rachel Maddow just called Ron Paul awesome

Seems like the establishment is breaking ranks . . .
 
Back
Top