Cafferty on Palin! *must see*

lol.... the question remains... why does she need to know dick about the economy?

The Presidents role isn't to Manage it.. so if all she would do is gtfo of the way of the market... all the more power to her.

Side note; probs first time I've defended her. lol She remains a retard in my books. :)
 
She is going to get destroyed in the VP debates and there is no amount of protection the McCain camp can provide for her to keep that from happening.
 
Palin is stunningly uninformed. I didn't expect genius out of her, but you'd think she could at least give a short, meaningless canned answer, rather than rambling on like an idiot...
 
"Why isn't it better to spend $700 billion helping middle class families who are struggling [...]?"

Katie Couric's question annoys me almost more than the answer. Just because Bush mentioned $700 billion, now everyone thinks there's $700 billion laying around to just give away.
 
"Why isn't it better to spend $700 billion helping middle class families who are struggling [...]?"

Katie Couric's question annoys me almost more than the answer. Just because Bush mentioned $700 billion, now everyone thinks there's $700 billion laying around to just give away.

Yep, outrageous. Why don't we just spend $2 trillion dollars to help struggling families...
 
Did you see Wolf's weasel attempt to defuse the situation? God bless Cafferty.

Paul/Cafferty 2012!
 
Misleading heading

That heading is misleading. I clicked on it hoping to see Cafferty ON Palin.
 
Last edited:
Dude, you are SO funny...... I laugh out loud when I read your posts usually. Thanks for the levity.
 
She is going to get destroyed in the VP debates and there is no amount of protection the McCain camp can provide for her to keep that from happening.

The VP debate is going to be boring. The format was changed so that the VPs won't get much of a chance to talk to each other.
 

Okay, that was a horrible answer and Palin is pathetic, but Couric's solution is to take all that tax money and throw it at schools & poor people. Couric is a CFR commie and part of the establishment elite, so she's framing the debate: either give the money to the financials, or give it to the poor. There's NO discussion of the very essence of the problem here, the fact that in both scenarios, money is being STOLEN from millions of people through violent coercion to get any of this done. Plus the fact that the government created the problem in the first place, why should any of us have to pay to fix it?

Palin & Couric can both go to hell.
 
Back
Top