Cable TV Price Increases Have Beaten Inflation Every Single Year For 20 Years

Since going to an antenna I found that some of the other channels were free over the air.

:D This is one of the biggest discoveries of the XXI first century - Many TV programs are available in HD for free with over the air antenna. To top it all, the quality is better because, unlike cable and satellite, the signal is not compressed.
 
What was it with taxes, box rental fee, HD service, and insurance? $50.00? I've noticed those fees add up to almost as much as the service.
That is the way my old cell phone plan was , 29.99 plan that ran 50 once all the taxes & fees were in there .
 
It is not a true monopoly, in that while there may be only a single cable company, there are multiple providers of the service. Over-the-air and satellite, for example.

Monopolies and cartels are creations of government, not markets. For example, the reason the media is dominated by a few large companies is that no one can operate a television or radio station unless they obtain federal approval and pay federal licensing fees. Similarly, anyone wishing to operate a cable company must not only comply with federal regulations, they must sign a “franchise” agreement with their local government. -Ron Paul

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arc...31/blame-government-not-markets-for-monopoly/
 
:D This is one of the biggest discoveries of the XXI first century - Many TV programs are available in HD for free with over the air antenna. To top it all, the quality is better because, unlike cable and satellite, the signal is not compressed.

Yeah, the HD over the air quality is fantastic. We get 29 channels over the air. It is more than enough.
 
I tried cutting cable about 3 years ago but I didn't get enough sports. When SlingTV came out with ESPN I was finally able to cut the cable.

I pay $40 for my ISP. $8 for Amazon. $20 for SlingTV. Free antenna. So for $68 a month (no extra fees) I get just about everything I need. No contracts either. No worrying about returning equipment or making appointments with installers.
 
Monopolies and cartels are creations of government, not markets. For example, the reason the media is dominated by a few large companies is that no one can operate a television or radio station unless they obtain federal approval and pay federal licensing fees. Similarly, anyone wishing to operate a cable company must not only comply with federal regulations, they must sign a “franchise” agreement with their local government. -Ron Paul

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arc...31/blame-government-not-markets-for-monopoly/

I concede there is an information monopoly, but that isn't what I'm talking about. There are several different ways to access that information, so therefore it isn't a true monopoly.

The cable / satellite companies broke the government broadcast monopoly. Before they existed, we were limited to 3 networks and a PBS station. Now while cable is limited in one area, you have different choices for getting stations. Satellite, over-the-air, cable, even DSL.

Cable is not a true monopoly because they do have competition for the service they provide. (Yes, I remember someone getting pissy about satellite internet speeds, but that's like complaining that kMart does not have Macy's quality clothes.)
 
I remember someone getting pissy about satellite internet speeds,

fwiw satellite speed rocks; routinely 15+ mbps (plenty good to stream HD movies)
the downside is max gigabytes per month; (limits "total movies per month")

I'm rural and run both dsl and sat on switch; sat when I need speed; dsl when I need bandwidth
Its kind of frustrating but what is called "5 mbps" dsl is sometimes sub dialup speed out here

from my end I see:

sat
>15 mbps
10 gigs max per month
not functional during heavy storms

dsl
<1 mbps
250 gigs max per month
sometimes not functional during peak hours of day due to too many online upstream

not complaining... just is what it is;
would be kind of like complaining about dirt in your door jambs when you live on dirt road
 
fwiw satellite speed rocks; routinely 15+ mbps (plenty good to stream HD movies)
the downside is max gigabytes per month; (limits "total movies per month")

I'm rural and run both dsl and sat on switch; sat when I need speed; dsl when I need bandwidth
Its kind of frustrating but what is called "5 mbps" dsl is sometimes sub dialup speed out here

from my end I see:

sat
>15 mbps
10 gigs max per month
not functional during heavy storms

dsl
<1 mbps
250 gigs max per month
sometimes not functional during peak hours of day due to too many online upstream

not complaining... just is what it is;
would be kind of like complaining about dirt in your door jambs when you live on dirt road

I have never ha satellite, but Amy <sniff!> hated it.
 
Satellite Internet is terrible. Not really their fault tho. The problem is that to send a signal directly to a satellite, you need a LOT of power, and that much power is simply not feasible for residential homes to handle. So, instead of beaming a signal back up to the satellite, they have to use another way to do it. Guess what? Dial Up is NOT dead. Usually you dont need very much for an upload speed on any internet connection, but because of the routing and stuff that goes on between both the Satellite and Dial Up Upload / DSL Upload, you end up with a lot of time between the transmitter and receiver. That is really what causes Satellite Internet to be poor.

For example, you ask your roommate in the next room a question and get a response back pretty snappy. That is standard high speed internet. Satellite would be the equivilant of you calling your roommate and asking them a question, but have to wait for a response, to which you get a big giant postal package mailed to you several days later. Thats Satellite Internet.

Satellite Internet isnt purposefully designed to be poor, it is just the fault of the nature of that type of system and what they have to do in order to make it work. You CAN get fast speeds out of Satellite Internet to do things like stream a movie, but you'll notice a ton of lag when you try to pause a streaming movie or video. Thats where the delay comes and and really the only thing about satellite I really cant stand, You can stream videos since downloading on satellite can go extremely quick, comparable to the highest high speed providers, but cant play online games with it to save your life due that lag. I pressed the UP key on my keyboard, then my character moved, then a week later, I got a message back from the game server.

Cable Internet, for those who are lucky enough to have it available in their area, has a distinct advantage in that the way that Data is Sent and Received comes from the same source, making networking routing stuffs all way way way way way faster. DSL is the next step down, but also has massive limitations. There is only so much an actual pair of copper wires can do. Due to the way phone calls also route stuff, there is not really a way to "Transmit" an internet signal across all phone lines at the same time as basically happens with Cable Internet. Next step down is Dial Up. Yes, it is still around because that is what people in very rural areas need for Satellite Internet to work. At the other end of the spectrum, going higher this time is Fiber or Fiber Optic. Optical Internet is sickeningly faster than even Cable Internet by orders of magnitude because you can pulse light beams much faster than you can change the voltage on a copper wire. There is so much less interference (as happens with copper pair through induction) on Optical Internet that you can start hitting Terabytes Per Second. Those are usually Internet Backbones. Nice thing about Optical is when it is upgraded, the Fiber Optic Cable itself does not need to be replaced, just the devices at both ends. That is especially useful since there is fiber optic cable (well, big ass bundles of them) that lay all across the ocean floor all over the place.

Anyway, thats what can be said about Internet Services.
 
Satellite Internet is terrible. Not really their fault tho. The problem is that to send a signal directly to a satellite, you need a LOT of power, and that much power is simply not feasible for residential homes to handle. So, instead of beaming a signal back up to the satellite, they have to use another way to do it. Guess what? Dial Up is NOT dead. Usually you dont need very much for an upload speed on any internet connection, but because of the routing and stuff that goes on between both the Satellite and Dial Up Upload / DSL Upload, you end up with a lot of time between the transmitter and receiver. That is really what causes Satellite Internet to be poor.

For example, you ask your roommate in the next room a question and get a response back pretty snappy. That is standard high speed internet. Satellite would be the equivilant of you calling your roommate and asking them a question, but have to wait for a response, to which you get a big giant postal package mailed to you several days later. Thats Satellite Internet.

Satellite Internet isnt purposefully designed to be poor, it is just the fault of the nature of that type of system and what they have to do in order to make it work. You CAN get fast speeds out of Satellite Internet to do things like stream a movie, but you'll notice a ton of lag when you try to pause a streaming movie or video. Thats where the delay comes and and really the only thing about satellite I really cant stand, You can stream videos since downloading on satellite can go extremely quick, comparable to the highest high speed providers, but cant play online games with it to save your life due that lag. I pressed the UP key on my keyboard, then my character moved, then a week later, I got a message back from the game server.

Cable Internet, for those who are lucky enough to have it available in their area, has a distinct advantage in that the way that Data is Sent and Received comes from the same source, making networking routing stuffs all way way way way way faster. DSL is the next step down, but also has massive limitations. There is only so much an actual pair of copper wires can do. Due to the way phone calls also route stuff, there is not really a way to "Transmit" an internet signal across all phone lines at the same time as basically happens with Cable Internet. Next step down is Dial Up. Yes, it is still around because that is what people in very rural areas need for Satellite Internet to work. At the other end of the spectrum, going higher this time is Fiber or Fiber Optic. Optical Internet is sickeningly faster than even Cable Internet by orders of magnitude because you can pulse light beams much faster than you can change the voltage on a copper wire. There is so much less interference (as happens with copper pair through induction) on Optical Internet that you can start hitting Terabytes Per Second. Those are usually Internet Backbones. Nice thing about Optical is when it is upgraded, the Fiber Optic Cable itself does not need to be replaced, just the devices at both ends. That is especially useful since there is fiber optic cable (well, big ass bundles of them) that lay all across the ocean floor all over the place.

Anyway, thats what can be said about Internet Services.

There are also wireless providers. You should be able to find somebody within 50-100 miles radius unless you really live in the middle of nowhere.
 
It is not a true monopoly, in that while there may be only a single cable company, there are multiple providers of the service. Over-the-air and satellite, for example.


Also, it is a luxury item, unlike water and electricity, both of which we are pretty much required to have unless we want our homes condemned.

Maybe not a "true" monopoly. But the government limits other cable providers from markets..

Let's say you want to travel by jet, but the government says only one airline with jets can service your area. You can take a propeller airline (slower), or a train or bus or ship.

But by your logic, no monopoly.
 
There are also wireless providers. You should be able to find somebody within 50-100 miles radius unless you really live in the middle of nowhere.

True. They tend to be much better than Satellite, but do suffer some issues like bottlenecking, definite bandwidth limits and usually limited by terrain and local geography, so typically semi urban environments are where wireless providers can make their services available. Its just an exchange of complications. Cable has its drawbacks too. For instance, dialup is portable. Plug a laptop into a phone line and you can dial pretty much anywhere and get online. Cant do that with cable, or satellite, but usually pretty easy with wireless if you know what youre doing.
 
True. They tend to be much better than Satellite, but do suffer some issues like bottlenecking, definite bandwidth limits and usually limited by terrain and local geography, so typically semi urban environments are where wireless providers can make their services available. Its just an exchange of complications.

Dude, that's FUD. Check the specs on this baby - https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/
 
There is too much latency on satellite or wifi for any serious FPS type gaming.
Compression on cable broadcasts sucks.

So cable internet, HD antenna, dual tuner card, 10TB of HDD, and DLNA network to the tvs..
 
Progress does not stand still, satellite fell into oblivion a few years ago, and definitively. The quality of the connection on cable TV at times faster.
 
It is not a true monopoly, in that while there may be only a single cable company, there are multiple providers of the service. Over-the-air and satellite, for example.


Also, it is a luxury item, unlike water and electricity, both of which we are pretty much required to have unless we want our homes condemned.


I'm talking about opening a business. I personally have the knowledge and resources to open a competing cable company to an area of around 500,000 people. The problem is that Cable Companies purchase the right to use utility polls from governments. It doesn't matter that I can provide the identical service without moving infrastructure for a quarter of the price; I don't even have the right to bid for use of the utility lines. Penalty for doing it anyway? How about 30 years in jail. that's a monopoly.

You're argument is akin to saying the TSA isn't a monopoly on airport security because you can drive. Yeah, no shit.
 
Hmm, from what ICR, prices go up with increased competition. This is assumed to be so because competition only arises in markets where there is huge demand for the product. While blaming government is easy, one could also look at the high cost of entry as well as the proven collusion between cable companies to maintain prices.
 
Back
Top