CA-Manuel Ramos, one of the cops that beat Kelly Thomas to death, arrested again

[tod evans]

We meet at 6pm on the third Monday of every month at the Golden Corral if you would like to join us.

Are there virgins and manna?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Most of AmeriKa, think things are just fine and dandy, thanks for asking.

A lie that cannot be supported.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

We meet at 6pm on the third Monday of every month at the Golden Corral if you would like to join us.

No thanks, I'll stick with constitutional intent over occult ritual.

 

[Anti Federalist]

A lie that cannot be supported.

Where the hell have you been?

If that is not true, we should be ending the second of a Paul presidency.

Show me a single poll that shows a majority of AmeriKans, gravely concerned about a loss of librety and willing to engage in peaceful revolution.

 

[Occam's Banana]

No thanks, I'll stick with constitutional intent over occult ritual.

That's pretty funny (not to mention ironic), given your tediously repititive demands that others recite magical incantations along with you ...

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

That's pretty funny (not to mention ironic), given your tediously repititive demands that others recite magical incantations along with you ...

This is derived from the framing documents.

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

But you refer to them as "magical incantations", which is a label, a cognitive distortion. This is logically the kind of reference the NWO would prefer over a description of the framing documents as presenting law.

An below you are so unaccountable to the fact that Americans need to stop the destruction of unalienable rights that the murder of Kelly Thomas represents, that the precise solution to that problem is labeled as spam.

Clearly, it could be stated that anyones use of the law found in the constitution or the framing documents would be "spam" and "derailment" to you. This makes it logical to suggest that you actually do not care to protect unalienable rights because you not only refuse to acknowledge their meaning, you attack people that try to gain uniform recognition of such meaning from Americans.

The entire logical and sincere purpose of discussing problems is to find solutions for them then share those solutions.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Where the hell have you been?

If that is not true, we should be ending the second of a Paul presidency.

Show me a single poll that shows a majority of AmeriKans, gravely concerned about a loss of librety and willing to engage in peaceful revolution.

You cite misinformed and mislead people along with a system of polling mislead people that is designed to mislead any who use them.

Of course polls not designed to
mislead are few and hard to find.

The purpose of free speech is abridged so we cannot possibly know from media our own perceptions as people.

I watch no media, listen to no media.

I do see many people holding gross misperceptions from using media information, especially the web. But the web has truth too, however it is always the hardest to find. Critical thinking is required to know it compared to its heavily promoted deceptive counterparts.

 

[phill4paul]

You cite misinformed and mislead people along with a system of polling mislead people that is designed to mislead any who use them.

Of course polls not designed to
mislead are few and hard to find.

The purpose of free speech is abridged so we cannot possibly know from media our own perceptions as people.

I watch no media, listen to no media.

I do see many people holding gross misperceptions from using media information, especially the web. But the web has truth too, however it is always the hardest to find. Critical thinking is required to know it compared to its heavily promoted deceptive counterparts.

 

[Anti Federalist]

You cite misinformed and mislead people...

The purpose of free speech is abridged so we cannot possibly know from media our own perceptions as people.

I watch no media, listen to no media.

Yes, the people are mislead and misinformed, which is why any effort to inform and make them aware of the peril they are in is needed before any sort of revolution takes place.

It does not matter that you watch or listen to no media, millions and millions and millions of your fellow citizens do.

And they are the ones that you want to unify, for a lawful and peaceful revolution.

Now, honestly, what do you think would happen, if you unleashed a swath of idiot AmeriKa on the bill of rights in an Article V convention?

You're running around in a powder magazine with a blowtorch and giggling about it.

 

[Anti Federalist]

///

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Yes, the people are mislead and misinformed, which is why any effort to inform and make them aware of the peril they are in is needed before any sort of revolution takes place.

It does not matter that you watch or listen to no media, millions and millions and millions of your fellow citizens do.

And they are the ones that you want to unify, for a lawful and peaceful revolution.

Now, honestly, what do you think would happen, if you unleashed a swath of idiot AmeriKa on the bill of rights in an Article V convention?

You're running around in a powder magazine with a blowtorch and giggling about it.

You never have addressed the effect of "Preparatory Amendment" so your fears of Article V are unreasonably stagnate in old fears created by the gov infiltration to make the public afraid of what the infiltration is afraid of.

People do not have to run from bad in order to run towards good. In fact, to know what is bad scares them so much they often just seize up and do nothing.

By virtue of that, perceiving what is good causes an ability to make quality decisions and act upon them.

Constant presentation of calamity with no positive options is not a logical path for inspiring confused and mislead people.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Clearly, it could be stated that anyones use of the law found in the constitution or the framing documents would be "spam" and "derailment" to you.

No, not anyone's.

Just yours.

 

[Anti Federalist]

By virtue of that, perceiving what is good causes an ability to make quality decisions and act upon them.

And how can they percieve good, being mislead and misinformed?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

And how can they percieve good, being mislead and misinformed?

Natural law works through instincts.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

No, not anyone's.

Just yours.

You will not be able to provide an example.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Clearly, it could be stated that anyones use of the law found in the constitution or the framing documents would be "spam" and "derailment" to you.

No, not anyone's.

Just yours.

You will not be able to provide an example.

https://www.google.com/search?q=sit...ristopher+A.+Brown"+"Do+you+agree+and+accept"

quod erat demonstrandum

 

[Anti Federalist]

By virtue of that, perceiving what is good causes an ability to make quality decisions and act upon them.

And how can they percieve good, being mislead and misinformed?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Natural law works through instincts.

So then why are we not in the second term of a Paul presidency?

 

[CPUd]

This is derived from the framing documents.

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

But you refer to them as "magical incantations", which is a label, a cognitive distortion. This is logically the kind of reference the NWO would prefer over a description of the framing documents as presenting law.

An below you are so unaccountable to the fact that Americans need to stop the destruction of unalienable rights that the murder of Kelly Thomas represents, that the precise solution to that problem is labeled as spam.

Clearly, it could be stated that anyones use of the law found in the constitution or the framing documents would be "spam" and "derailment" to you. This makes it logical to suggest that you actually do not care to protect unalienable rights because you not only refuse to acknowledge their meaning, you attack people that try to gain uniform recognition of such meaning from Americans.

The entire logical and sincere purpose of discussing problems is to find solutions for them then share those solutions.