Bush cedes soveriegnty of U.S. to United Nations

Ira Aten

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
763
Here is what our allowing a "trilateral network of law enforcment" will do for you.

Of course, this is not a true thing, it is just a "conspiracy theory" cooked up by tin foil hat guys....:rolleyes:


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57369

PREMEDITATED MERGER
U.S. under U.N. law in health emergency
Bush's SPP power grab sets stage for military to manage flu threats

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: August 28, 2007
11:15 p.m. Eastern



By Jerome R. Corsi



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

David Nabarro is new U.N. system influenza coordinator
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America summit in Canada released a plan that establishes U.N. law along with regulations by the World Trade Organization and World Health Organization as supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic and sets the stage for militarizing the management of continental health emergencies.

The "North American Plan for Avian & Pandemic Influenza" was finalized at the SPP summit last week in Montebello, Quebec.

At the same time, the U.S. Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, has created a webpage dedicated to avian flu and has been running exercises in preparation for the possible use of U.S. military forces in a continental domestic emergency involving avian flu or pandemic influenza.

With virtually no media attention, in 2005 President Bush shifted U.S. policy on avian flu and pandemic influenza, placing the country under international guidelines not specifically determined by domestic agencies.

The policy shift was formalized Sept. 14, 2005, when Bush announced a new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza to a High-Level Plenary Meeting of the U.N. General Assembly, in New York.

(Story continues below)

The new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza was designed to supersede an earlier November 2005 Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security, Health and Agriculture.

The 2005 plan, operative until Bush announced the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, directed the State Department to work with the WHO and U.N., but it does not mention that international health controls are to be considered controlling over relevant U.S. statutes or authorities.

Under the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, Bush agreed the U.S. would work through the U.N. system influenza coordinator to develop a continental emergency response plan operating through authorities under the WTO, North American Free Trade Agreement and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization.

WND could find no evidence the Bush administration presented the Influenza Partnership plan to Congress for oversight or approval.

The SPP plan for avian and pandemic influenza announced at the Canadian summit last week embraces the international control principles Bush first announced to the U.N. in his 2005 International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza declaration.

The SPP plan gives primacy for avian and pandemic influenza management to plans developed by the WHO, WTO, U.N. and NAFTA directives – not decisions made by U.S. agencies.

The U.N.-WHO-WTO-NAFTA plan advanced by SPP features a prominent role for the U.N. system influenza coordinator as a central international director in the case of a North American avian flu or pandemic influenza outbreak.

In Sept. 2005, Dr. David Nabarro was appointed the first U.N. system influenza coordinator, a position which also places him as a senior policy adviser to the U.N. director-general.

Nabarro joined the WHO in 1999 and was appointed WHO executive director of sustainable development and health environments in July 2002.

In a Sept. 29, 2005, press conference at the U.N., Nabarro made clear that his job was to prepare for the H5N1 virus, known as the avian flu.

Nabarro fueled the global fear that an epidemic was virtually inevitable.

In response to a question about the 1918-1919 flu pandemic that killed approximately 40 million people worldwide, Nabarro commented, "I am certain there will be another pandemic sometime."

Nabarro stressed at the press conference that he saw as inevitable a worldwide pandemic influenza coming soon that would kill millions.

He quantified the deaths he expected as follows: "I'm not, at the moment at liberty to give you a prediction on numbers, but I just want to stress, that, let's say, the range of deaths could be anything from 5 to 150 million."

In a March 8, 2006, U.N. press conference that was reported on a State Department website, Nabarro predicted an outbreak of the H5N1 virus would "reach the Americas within the next six to 12 months."

On Feb. 1, 2006, NORTHCOM hosted representatives of more than 40 international, federal and state agencies for "an exercise designed to provoke discussion and determine what governmental actions, including military support, would be necessary in the event of an influenza pandemic in the United States."

NORTHCOM and other governmental websites document the growing role the Bush administration plans for the U.S. military to be involved in continental domestic emergencies involving health, including avian flu and pandemic influenza.

NORTHCOM participated in a nationwide Joint Chiefs of Staff-directed exercise – code-named Exercise Ardent Sentry 06 – to rehearse cooperation between Department of Defense and local, state and federal agencies, as well as the Canadian government.

A pandemic influenza crisis was one of the four scenarios gamed in Exercise Ardent Sentry 06, involving a scenario of a plague in Mexico reaching across the border into Arizona and New Mexico.

As has been customary in SPP documents and declarations, the Montebello, Canada, announcement of the North American Plan for Avian & Pandemic Influenza acknowledges in passing the sovereignty of the three nations.

The announcement says, "The Plan is not intended to replace existing arrangements or agreements. As such, each country's laws are to be respected and this Plan is to be subordinate and complementary to domestic response plans, existing arrangements and bilateral or multilateral agreements."

Still, the SPP plan argues the risk from avian and pandemic influenza was so great to North America that the leaders of the three nations were compelled "to work collectively and with all levels of government, the private sector and among-non-governmental organizations to combat avian and pandemic influenza."

Moreover, the SPP plan openly acknowledges, "The WHO's international guidance formed much of the basis for the three countries' planning for North American preparedness and response."

WND previously reported NORTHCOM has been established with a command center at Peterson Air Force Base, tasked with using the U.S. military in continental domestic emergency situations.

WND also has reported President Bush signed in May two documents, National Security Presidential Directive-51 and Homeland Security Presidential Directive-20, which give the office of the president extraordinary powers to declare national emergencies and to assume near-dictatorial powers.

Following the Montebello summit last week, the SPP North American Plan for Avian & Pandemic Influenza was published on a made-over SPP homepage redesigned to feature agreements newly reached by trilateral bureaucratic working groups.
 
This is very interesting. I have to admit that the one place where I think it is possible to hold onto national sovereignty too tightly is in regard to infectious disease. Infectious disease is really scary, and it's not like people either die from it or get well-- there can be huge costs in terms of lingering disability.

Speaking of our candidate, Ron Paul doesn't have any statements I'm aware of in relation to controlling the spread of infectious diseases, though. Do you know of any?
 
the bird flu is a joke - i dont belive it - its an excuse for mass vaccinations..which are not always so healthy if not deadly themselves.....its to create more paranoia etc..Im not saying there is no possibility of pandemic flus but I think tehy are overselling every fearful thing out there right now.....im sick of it! If its not nukes flying over ead the FDA wants to tell us Vit C causes cancer and should be banned....its maddening and all about control.
 
I'm a tinfoil hat wearer --

I think either -- "they" have created superviruses and the flu and will create something so we will be forced to 'get a vaccine'.

And who knows what's in the 'vaccine' -- could be implantable chip to program us or some slow acting poison or whatever.

My kids don't get vaccines and I don't 'believe in" injecting foreign substances in my body - and so what would happen to people who flat-out refuse to get a vaccine? My kids never get drugs or even antibiotics and we're always healthy except the occasional cold or flu.

And while I'm 100% raw, I never get sick.
 
Lois,
I'm with you there. Only basic immunizations from late 50's/early 60's.
Non flouridated water, REAL food, etc.
I just don't get sick like all the sheep that seem to live at the Dr.'s

What happens if ya refuse? They've got that covered.

Ever hear of the Haliburton Hotel?


.
 
Is Jerome Corsi a reliable source?

VERY RELIABLE. A BRILLIANT MAN THAT HAD HIS P.H.D. FROM HARVARD AT AGE 24.HE IS THE ONE THAT BROUGHT THE SPP TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN IT WAS ONLY ONE PAGE ON THE INTERNET. HE HAS WRITTEN MANY ARTICLES ON WORLD NET DAILEY ABOUT NAU, ETC. HE IS THE ONE THAT WAS TAKEN TO NORTHCOM AND TOLD THAT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE WAR GAMES IN ALL 50 STATES FOR THE NEXT 5 YEARS. THEY ARE OF COURSE NOT WAR GAMES!!!
 
Vaccines are for sheep

Refuse the vaccines period!!

When the 1918 outbreak happened the statistics showed people that took the vaccines were much more likely to contract the illness.

Tell them you refuse for religious reasons. If you have to, say you're a Jehova Witness. Those people don't have to take vaccines because of Religious reasons. That is their legal right.


MORE BELOW:

This stunning censored interview was cut from the TV program "The Health Century" due to its huge liability -- the admission that the Merck drug company has been injecting cancer viruses into people worldwide.

Merck - cancer viruses in vaccines
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udTmlhQaIeg
10 min

Dr. Hilleman acknowledged that he discovered that the Sabine polio vaccine (manufactured by Merck) was infected with the SV-40 cancer virus. In the process of developing vaccines Merck scientists are shown to blithely disregarded public safety as they conducted massive tests exposing millions of unsuspecting people to wild viruses. Dr. Hilleman acknowledged that the cancer infected polio vaccine had been tested in massive field trials in Russia, then in the U.S.

If you find the content shocking, consider watching the second video, the entire movie.

In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood and Bioterrorism
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8674401787208020885
2 hrs

This film is produced and freely distributed by consumer protector and public health expert, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, and features the world's leading vaccine expert, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, explaining why Merck's vaccines have spread AIDS, leukemia, and other horrific plagues worldwide.
It may seem inconceivable to some of you, but disease is Big Business. And, if you’re cynical – which seems to become easier with each passing day -- it’s a way to achieve control while making huge profits in the process.
 
Last edited:
This is very interesting. I have to admit that the one place where I think it is possible to hold onto national sovereignty too tightly is in regard to infectious disease. Infectious disease is really scary, and it's not like people either die from it or get well-- there can be huge costs in terms of lingering disability.

Speaking of our candidate, Ron Paul doesn't have any statements I'm aware of in relation to controlling the spread of infectious diseases, though. Do you know of any?

What's bad about national sovereignty in this kind of situation? The US should be able to decide for itself how to handle infectious diseases; who ever said that the UN's centralized policy is the best? The more centralized the "decider," the more likely the decision will be poor, short-sighted, and irreversible...in addition, centralization only ensures that everyone will go down as the result of a bad decision.
 
Last edited:
I work an environment where I have seen several epidemiologists speak regarding birdflu.

A couple of salient points I have come away with...

H5N1 is killed by hot water and soap. As long as it is not airborne good hygiene will prevent its spread.

Tamiflu is the best current treatment. The CDC has a "stockpile." I can't remember the number but nowhere close to everyone getting this stuff. In order to be effective two doses must be given. The first when symptoms start, and the second AFTER 3-6 weeks. How long do folks who get infected with H5N1 last? A week? Maybe two? Do you see the disconnect? Watching the FEMA response to Katrina also begs the question of would the feds even be able to get the stuff where it was needed?

Stockpile food and water. If anyone comes to "take you to safety" I wouldn't go. You don't want to end up in a Halliburton camp "awaiting treatment" while the virus ravages the close quarters populace.

If you do not come in physical contact with someone or animal that has the virus in its current state you will not get it. If you get it on your hands and wash them before you touch an orifice you will not get it. If it mutates and goes airborne (or if it is purposefully mutated) then you cannot be breathing around anyone who has it without a respirator. The easiest solution is to just stay away from everyone.

I would also add that scenarios like this would be another excellent example of the need for the 2nd amendment, as in, "Don't come on my property as you might be INFECTED. I'll take care of my own." If you don't touch it you can't get it.
 
Back
Top