Bundy Trial ends In Mistrial!

Unsealed Court Docs Show How Prosecutors Tried To Rig Bundy Trial

TIM PEARCE
Energy Reporter

Unsealed court documents detail how the team of prosecutors tasked with convicting Cliven Bundy and his sons of crimes relating to a 2014 armed standoff failed to turn over potential exculpatory evidence to the court, The Oregonian reports.

The Bundys’ case ended in a mistrial Dec. 20 after Judge Gloria Navarro ruled that prosecutors violated the civil rights of the defendants by withholding evidence supporting the Bundys’ case. Navarro is considering dismissing the case “with prejudice” and blocking prosecutors from retrying the case. Her decision will come Jan. 8, according to The New York Times.

“There were approximately 3,000 pages that were provided to us only after we started trial,” Bundy lawyer Bret D. Whipple told TheNYT. “I personally have never seen anything like this, especially in a case of such importance.”

Those 3,000 pages include the Bundys’ requests for multiple federal assessments that showed the Bundy family was likely not dangerous. Prosecutors called the requests part of a “long list of frivolous and vexatious pleadings,” until a government witness, under cross examination, revealed knowledge of the assessments in court, The Oregonian reports.

Defense attorney’s asked federal prosecutors to hand over Inspector General reports on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) agent Dan Love, who directed the BLM raid on the Bundy ranch to seize the family’s cattle over decades of unpaid grazing fees. Love was fired from the agency in September for corruption and unethical behavior.

Prosecutors had dismissed the allegations and investigations of Love as an “urban legend,” but ended up handing over 500 pages worth of reports on Love in December, according to The Oregonian.

The Bundys’ lawyers made two requests to Navarro for a special “discovery monitor” to ensure that all relevant documents were being turned over by the prosecution. Both requests were denied. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, however, launched an investigation into prosecutorial misconduct after the mistrial.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/29/u...dy-trial/?utm_referrer=https://zen.yandex.com
 
bj4.jpg

None of it added up to Glendale police. So they charged Johnson with unauthorized practice of private investigations and issued a summons to appear in court. Local prosecutors dropped the charges after receiving a letter from the FBI asking them not to prosecute.

It’s unclear what the goal of Johnson’s Glendale undercover operation was or why the FBI’s Denver office decided to use a journalistic cover. “We are not able to comment on the questions you have posed,” said Special Agent Amy Sanders, a spokesperson for the FBI’s Denver office.

In June 2016, four months after this incident, the FBI adopted an interim policy that requires undercover operations involving the impersonation of news media to be approved by the deputy director of the FBI in consultation with the deputy attorney general. As FBI director, James Comey defended the practice of impersonating journalists in criminal investigations but described it as “rare.”

Johnson testified in March in the jury trial of six defendants who had supported the Bundys during the 2014 standoff with federal agents. The trial ended in convictions against two defendants and a hung jury for the other four. Johnson is also expected to testify in the trial of Cliven Bundy and his sons, which is scheduled to begin June 26. The trial may include as evidence video that Johnson produced while impersonating a documentary filmmaker.

https://theintercept.com/2017/05/16...-in-jail-after-pretending-to-be-a-journalist/
 
Ryan Bundy Files For Dismissal Of Indictment
https://redoubtnews.com/2017/12/ryan-bundy-files-dismissal-indictment/



IMAGINE….

You and your family are enjoying a Sunday BBQ in your back yard when suddenly heavily armed thugs rush into your yard intent on stealing your pets, your food and your water and harming your wife, children and other family members!

Fortunately for you, neighbors and friends having been alerted to this band of armed robbers come to your rescue to show their support…the thugs depart.

Two years later other heavily armed thugs show up, arrest you for resisting the previous thugs, throw you in prison and abuse you for nearly two years, while their cohorts in criminal court weave a vicious story about YOUR armed resistance to “law enforcement”.

What do you do????



*Update: The motion was amended on Dec. 29th. The attachment below reflects the amended motion.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/...-MANDATE-DISMISS-MISTRIAL-003082-R.Bundy_.pdf
 
All the news today is about the persecutors groveling for a chance to flaunt their incompetence one more time.

And with evidence available they should do so,, and put the US GOV on trial.

I can not believe there is a rational mind that would do so,, so we are obviously dealing with some form of deviant mind.

we should see in a week.
 
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/08/breaking-federal-judge-throws-out-case-against-cliven-bundy-with-prejudice-gross-prosecutorial-misconduct/#more-144332

BREAKING – Federal Judge Throws Out Case Against Cliven Bundy – “With Prejudice”, “Gross Prosecutorial Misconduct”…
Posted on January 8, 2018 by sundance
Wow. Follow up to THIS STORY – In a stunning rebuke to federal prosecutors a federal court judge has thrown out the case against Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy “with prejudice”. Bundy and his sons cannot be retried, and will walk free.





In order for a federal judge to completely dismiss a case of this significance indicates the court has found serious and compelling evidence of “gross misconduct” on the part of the prosecuting team.


LAS VEGAS — Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, his two sons and a militia member will not face a retrial on charges that they led an armed rebellion against federal agents in 2014.


A federal judge on Monday said the federal prosecutors’ conduct was “outrageous” and “violated due process rights” of the defendants.




U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro dismissed the charges against the four men “with prejudice,” meaning they cannot face trial again. She said a new trial would not be sufficient to address the problems in the case and would provide the prosecution with an unfair advantage going forward.


As the courtroom doors opened after Navarro’s ruling, a huge cheer went up from the crowd of spectators gathered outside.


Navarro’s decision comes less than a month after she declared a mistrial in case and found federal prosecutors willfully withheld critical and “potentially exculpatory” evidence from the defense.


Cliven Bundy, his sons Ammon and Ryan Bundy, and militia member Ryan Payne were all in court. Cliven Bundy had remained in jail until the hearing; the judge ordered his immediate release.


Navarro on Dec. 20 cited six pieces of evidence the Nevada U.S. Attorney’s Office failed to disclose that was favorable to the defense and could have changed the outcome of the trial.


The evidence included:



  • Records about surveillance at the Bundy ranch;
  • Maps about government surveillance;
  • Records about the presence of government snipers;
  • FBI logs about activity at the ranch in the days leading up to standoff;
  • Law-enforcement assessments dating to 2012 that found the Bundys posed no threat;
  • Internal affairs reports about misconduct by Bureau of Land Management agents.
“Failure to turn over such evidence violates due process,” Navarro said last month. “A fair trial at this point is impossible.” (read more)


 
Sue the shit right out of them. I'm not sure what the chances of success are but if someone with the legal background to know told me they were good I would drop the hammer and hard.
 
Sue the shit right out of them. I'm not sure what the chances of success are but if someone with the legal background to know told me they were good I would drop the hammer and hard.

Absolutely. Two Federal trials and two Federal trial failures. Also time for a restraint order on Uncle Sam. If it ever happens again a case could be made for targeted persecution.
 

From the tidbits in the article, the judge ripped the prosecution, FBI and other federal agents. The prosecution's conduct was "outrageous", and "violated the due process" of defendants with an "intentional abdication of its responsibility".

"The court finds that the universal sense of justice has been violated". "A fair trial at this point is impossible."
 
From the tidbits in the article, the judge ripped the prosecution, FBI and other federal agents. The prosecution's conduct was "outrageous", and "violated the due process" of defendants with an "intentional abdication of its responsibility".

"The court finds that the universal sense of justice has been violated". "A fair trial at this point is impossible."

When is she going to criticize her own behavior?
 
From the tidbits in the article, the judge ripped the prosecution, FBI and other federal agents. The prosecution's conduct was "outrageous", and "violated the due process" of defendants with an "intentional abdication of its responsibility".

"The court finds that the universal sense of justice has been violated". "A fair trial at this point is impossible."

Navarro did her fair share. She would not let the U.S. Constitution be used as a defense. At every opportunity she sided with the prosecution and inhibited the defense. She was biased to the the Federal government. She was in CYA mode. The bitch needs to be hanged from a lamp post.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top