Bundy Ranch supporters behaving badly

[Thor]

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Bunkerville,+NV/@36.73087,-114.221081,3a,75y,245.62h,64.31t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1syuLWFestqFzJ_pyzvadQaQ!2e0!4m2!3m1!1s0x80cbd54ec0ad6e5f:0x353eb5bdcea1bf77

Beautiful, found it!

http://goo.gl/maps/XG0m8


Once in street view, you can see a rabbit dart across the google car as you move forward



So yes, that supporter was in fact on a public road, NOT a private drive. Shame on him!

Yeah, you found it. I showed it to you last night (see my first quoted post.)

 

[AuH20]

Why doesn't this cameraman go into the FBI's briefing room like this?

 

[pcosmar]

So yes, that supporter was in fact on a public road, NOT a private drive. Shame on him!

It would be nice to have some context. I know that Oath Keepers are providing security for the ranch..And that this is in the close proximity if not part of the ranch proper.
Were these folks already stirring shit and asked to leave? From their agenda driven reporting I suspect that is likely..He also seems to be looking back for some reason,, (to his backup,,or for direction,,I don't know).

I would guess from what I have seen from many other videos of the people and area,, that they we not welcome for a reason.

and again, the Bundys have been there since before there were automobiles,, so who built that road in the first place?
I would bet it was the Bundys.

 

[Tod]

Yeah, you found it. I showed it to you last night (see my first quoted post.)

Sorry, didn't mean to imply that I found it independently....it was entirely because of your link that I saw it (found it carries the wrong connotation). + rep for your link and help!

 

[Keith and stuff]

The guy in the 1st video should either do the right thing or take his hat off. No need to pretend to be an Oath Keeper.

 

[Cleaner44]

Well, I don't know where that first video was shot; I don't see any place along Gold Butte Road that could be it. The fact that it is paved suggests (but does not prove) that it is a public road.

I don't know if this will help, but here is apparently where the Bundy Ranch is according to Google Maps:
http://goo.gl/maps/AevBF

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

lots of cameras can incriminate people if something did go down. Don't blame the guy in a tense situation like that. Can't be friendly when lives are on the line.

 

[dannno]

Well either one of them could be federal agents is the problem.

 

[phill4paul]

It's an unconscious 3 ring circus. This is the third ring.

An example of group think nearing a extreme. Meanwhile, here, since before bundy, solution is all but ignored because of cognitive spasms created by a few bizarro posters.

All of this is completely based on the law of the land and the first steps can be taken as easily as posting a comment. But noooooo, group think is in control, there and here.

We need to exercise our first constitutional right, to "alter or abolish". First action, clean up states.

http://algoxy.com/poly/principal_party.html

A step by step process in a forum which stands un opposed because it is fully lawful and logical.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...V-convention&p=5433668&viewfull=1#post5433668

Annnddd...I'm just gonna start neg repping the spam.

 

[phill4paul]

Bundy & his family are/were just a bunch of harmless hicks that hate the BLM & the Feds but now the far right, anti government, super religious, conspiracy nuts have made them their prophet.
The difference between Bundy ranch & Waco is that there isn’t an imminent threat. David Karesh was molesting kids, this is stupid fucking cows in the middle of nowhere.

You're not a journalist if you don't report facts without a bias. Just another asshat with a camera. That aside it would have been a good opportunity to enlighten this schmuck.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Annnddd...I'm just gonna start neg repping the spam.

That, in this case, is neg repping the 1787 constitution.

 

[Uriel999]

That, in this case, is neg repping the 1787 constitution.

Maybe he is like me and prefers the Articles of Confederation. Now THERE was a government!

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

There is an integration of intent between the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that I doubt can be equaled.

It goes like this.

Our first right, 1776 is to "alter or abolish", and that is codified in Article V. From 1776 we have "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness", which was unfortunately disconnected from freedom of speech in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights.

Which does not mean that we should consider it as anything BUT connected, because it is natural law that they be connected.

Can you show that the Articles of Confederation would provide for those two basic rights better than the combined intent as I've laid it out? I'm actually interested in this because I do not understand the Articles of Confederation well at all. I've focused on sorting out the situation I explain above.

Unfortunately, because of cognitive infiltration, Americans are very confused about their instincts, natural law and the purpose of free speech. This effort to use that prime constitutional intent of freedom of speech to distinguish between sincere Americans and agents of infiltration has been maligned, at the expense, perhaps, of America and the future of humanity.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...ricans-Accept-The-Root-Purpose-Of-Free-Speech

Cognitive infiltration is a very tricky business. Media over 40 years has corrupted our language usage in a way that has turned internet posting and perceptions into a social game. This, while needed vital communications for constitutional defense cannot be conducted without the treasonous interference.