BREAKING: US Launches Tomahawks Into Syria

[misterx]

If he had voted, would anything be different at all?

If you had abstained, would anything be different at all?

Voting doesn't gain you anything, and abstaining doesn't lose you anything.

On anything but the smallest and most local of levels, it's nothing but an irrelvant distraction.

So why bother?

If everyone who voted Trump as the lesser of two evils had abstained, then we would have President Clinton. If everyone of my mindset had written in Rand Paul, we'd still have President Clinton. I don't see what is so hard to understand about that. I think there is a malicious, subversive element in conservative circles trying to convince them that voting is pointless.

 

[AngryCanadian]

ISIS has started attacking SAA positions in Homs.

 

[misterx]

President Putin “regards the strikes as aggression against a sovereign nation,” his spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, noting that the president believes the strikes were carried out “in violation of international law, and also under an invented pretext.”

https://www.rt.com/news/383815-putin-us-syria-aggression/

 

[parocks]

Why? Do you think if Trump didn't win that things would be better? So Trump isn't the savior we hoped for, it's not like we'd be better off if Hillary won.

Hillary, obviously, is total garbage and with Trump the possible outcomes were somewhere between kinda good and kinda garbage, and he's moving toward kinda garbage.

Don't we get awful all the time? Aren't we used to choosing between bad choices?

 

[devil21]

Which was Johnson?

You mean the one with CFR Bill Weld as his running mate? Chicken dung.

 

[devil21]

I believe the gas attacks may have been a false flag. Not to minimize their deaths, but ironically, the amount killed is less than a third of the civilians killed in the U.S. airstrikes on Mosul in March.

This is assuming there was a real gas incident in the first place. There's way too big of a track record of fakery to accept even the basic premise of a gas incident at face value. Once you accept the premise, the rest is just details.

Watch this shit:

 

[Occam's Banana]

If everyone who voted Trump as the lesser of two evils had abstained, then we would have President Clinton.

I didn't say anything about "everyone who voted for Trump."

I asked "If he had voted, would anything be different?"

I asked "If you had abstained, would anything be different?"

If everyone of my mindset had written in Rand Paul, we'd still have President Clinton.

I didn't say anything about "everyone of [your] mindset [writing] in Rand Paul."

I asked "If he had voted, would anything be different?"

I asked "If you had abstained, would anything be different?"

I don't see what is so hard to understand about that.

There isn't anything hard to understand about it.

It just doesn't have anything to do with what I asked.

I think there is a malicious, subversive element in conservative circles trying to convince them that voting is pointless.

Not being in "conservative circles" I wouldn't know anything about the motivations of its elements.

 

[devil21]

^^^^Y'all need to ignore all of misterx's posts. Disruption shills gonna disrupt threads.

---------------------

Israelis and Saudis have both praised the missile attack. Why? Because there's no difference. Both are Yahudi crypto (fake) jews working together.

 

[misterx]

I didn't say anything about "everyone who voted for Trump."

I asked "If he [Ender] had voted, would anything be different?"

I asked "If you had abstained, would anything be different?"



I didn't say anything about "everyone of [your] mindset [writing] in Rand Paul."

I asked "If he [Ender] had voted, would anything be different?"

I asked "If you had abstained, would anything be different?"



There isn't anything hard to understand about it.

It just doesn't have anything to do with what I asked.



Not being in "conservative circles" I wouldn't know anything about the motivations of its elements.

Sorry, I live in the real world where the events that cause one person to abstain cause thousands of others to abstain. Had I chosen to abstain, the beliefs/events/influences that caused me to abstain would have caused thousands more to do the same, and could have swayed the election. Therefore, it's impossible to say that in the real world, my abstaining would have made zero difference.

 

[twomp]

^^^^Y'all need to ignore all of misterx's posts. Disruption shills gonna disrupt threads.

---------------------

Israelis and Saudis have both praised the missile attack. Why? Because there's no difference. Both are Yahudi crypto (fake) jews working together.

Al Qaeda, ISIS, Marco Rubio, McCain, Graham, Chuck Schumer have all praised Trump on this attack. And of course, don't forget this gem:

Hillary Clinton calls for U.S. to bomb Syrian air fields

In her first interview since her stunning presidential election defeat by Republican rival Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton on Thursday called for the United States to bomb Syrian air fields.

Clinton, in an interview at the Women in the World Summit in New York, also called Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election a theft more damaging than Watergate.

Asked whether she now believes that failing to take a tougher stand against Syria was her worst foreign policy mistake as secretary of state under President Barack Obama, Clinton said she favored more aggressive action against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

"I think we should have been more willing to confront Assad," Clinton said in the interview, conducted by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

"I really believe we should have and still should take out his air fields and prevent him from being able to use them to bomb innocent people and drop sarin gas on them."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-hillary-clinton-idUSKBN179058

 

[AngryCanadian]

BREAKING!
Russia "halts" agreement with U.S. to avoid clashes in Syria airspace

Press TV,RT Citing officials.

 

[timosman]

 

[twomp]

BREAKING!
Russia "halts" agreement with U.S. to avoid clashes in Syria airspace

Press TV,RT Citing officials.

Things are about to get out of control.

 

[misterx]

Things are about to get out of control.

RT had a from NSC member saying that will actually reduce the chances of escalation. I don't know what her reasoning is for that.

 

[twomp]

RT had a from NSC member saying that will actually reduce the chances of escalation. I don't know what her reasoning is for that.

It would be interesting to hear the reasoning for that. It's been in my experience that cutting off communications usually leads to bigger problems.

 

[misterx]

It would be interesting to hear the reasoning for that. It's been in my experience that cutting off communications usually leads to bigger problems.

I'm assuming that she believes it will stop the US military from making further moves until diplomacy has had a chance to run its course.

 

[twomp]

I'm assuming that she believes it will stop the US military from making further moves until diplomacy has had a chance to run its course.

Hopefully. I read it as a warning that Russia will fire at any flying object that isn't waving a Russian flag.

 

[misterx]

Hopefully. I read it as a warning that Russia will fire at any flying object that isn't waving a Russian flag.

Exactly. Which is why Trump would be a fool to attack Assad again right now.

Basically, I read this as Russia saying,"this stops now, either you handle this diplomatically, or you will have more than just the Syrian Army to worry about."

 

[devil21]

Hopefully. I read it as a warning that Russia will fire at any flying object that isn't waving a Russian flag.

Some Wall St foreshadowing:

 

[twomp]

Exactly. Which is why Trump would be a fool to attack Assad again right now.