BREAKING: Trump To Appoint John Bolton as National Security Advisor

Trump appointed uber-hawk John Bolton, sure...

...but I have it on the best authority that Hillary would have appointed the superdevil.

That's right, folks, not just the regular devil: the superdevil!

hqdefault.jpg
The federal government said they won't use any appropriated money in targetting medical marijuana dispensaries.








So there's that.
 
The federal government said they won't use any appropriated money in targetting medical marijuana dispensaries.








So there's that.

Except in Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska and South Dakota.

The geography of those last three is interesting. So, we can't have any weed moving between east and west that bypasses the Clintons' I-40 Drug Corridor?
 
I never understood why people would be able to explain why they liked liberty (which was/is? a requirement to join here), and then support a man who has showed nothing but disdain for liberty. The liberty lovers with a latent love for tyrants? Interesting stuff.

Ron Paul warned us.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/18/ron-paul-i-couldnt-support-donald-trump-nominee/

Former Texas Rep. Ron Paul said Friday he couldn’t support GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump if Mr. Trump wins the party’s nomination, saying Mr. Trump’s views on the scope of executive authority could surpass those of President Obama.

“No, I couldn’t do that,” Mr. Paul said on Fox Business Network when asked if he would support Mr. Trump, should the billionaire businessman win the GOP nomination. “He’s [the] opposite of a libertarian.”

Mr. Paul, a three-time presidential candidate, said on foreign policy, Mr. Trump probably wouldn’t be that much different than former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democratic front-runner.

“I think the die-hard neoconservatives would not be that extremely unhappy with Hillary,”
Mr. Paul said.

“Trump is going to be the most efficient [at] using the executive orders,” he said. “He’ll say this is the way it is, you know. Obama was pretty arrogant. If you don’t do it, [the] Congress, I’ll write an order. Well, I think Trump [will] be 10 times worse on writing orders because he’s used to doing this, and he brags about it.”

He wants to be the boss. I’m not looking for a boss. We want somebody that will allow us to be our own boss, is what I think we should be looking for,” Mr. Paul said.
 
I never understood why people would be able to explain why they liked liberty (which was/is? a requirement to join here), and then support a man who has showed nothing but disdain for liberty. The liberty lovers with a latent love for tyrants? Interesting stuff.

Because he is a wrecking ball against the deep state, a group that hates liberty way more than Trump.
 
Because he is a wrecking ball against the deep state, a group that hates liberty way more than Trump.

Sessions is doggedly holding the line for Big Pharma, Bolton is nominated for National Security, ex-CIA boss Pompeo is nominated for Secretary of State, the ante is up in Syria, tensions are higher with Russia than at any time since the end of the USSR, gun control is in the works (NICS got fixed, for example), and nobody is auditing the Fed.

Your wrecking ball hasn't knocked enough dust off the Deep State to fill a thimble.

Smoke a few more bong hits and tie yourself in a pretzel of logic again and the answer will still be the same. What you call a wrecking ball any sane observer calls a construction crew.
 
Cernovich's wet dreams and obsessive fan fiction are not inside baseball.

Cernovich knows more about what is going on in the White House than you will ever know..

He has predicted things weeks, months and even was talking about a lot of this stuff that is going on now a year ago.

He said McMaster and his cronies were the leakers, and it turns out he was right and that is why he and his crew were fired.

Didn't you see the thread zippy posted a couple days or so ago? Trump furious about another leak? Now McMaster gone? Put the puzzle together.
 
Cernovich knows more about what is going on in the White House than you will ever know..

He has predicted things weeks, months and even was talking about a lot of this stuff that is going on now a year ago.

Did he predict John Bolton would eventually be guiding foreign policy? Cos I did.

Did he say trump would spend at levels that, as Rand said "would make Obama blush?" Cos I did.

Did he say trump was going to be the greatest gift ever given to neoconservatism? Cos I did.
 
Did he predict John Bolton would eventually be guiding foreign policy? Cos I did.

That's a bold prediction, we will see if it happens. Anything specific you have in mind?



Did he say trump would spend at levels that, as Rand said "would make Obama blush?" Cos I did.

Did he say trump was going to be the greatest gift ever given to neoconservatism? Cos I did.

Not that I am aware..
 
It takes a special kind of mind in order to equate exposing Trump to being a Hillary shill.

Where did anyone make that connection? There are those that are rational in their opposition of Trump policies and those who are not. Clearly you are making a choice to be irrational in your opposition.
 
Granted were all pissed about Bolton and the Omnibus but to say we should wish Hillary were our President is a bit over the top.

If you could stop trying to make a federal case out of it long enough to think it through, you might just find he was asking the very thing a bunch of us have been asking for over a year...

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
 
Back
Top