Boycott the elections

[Firestarter]

Why would you vote?

Damn silly agreement that refusing to vote helps anything. It makes the other vote count more, always. The establishment loves the angry voter staying home and staying silent.

If we would live in a democracy, I’d be the first to vote (or would at least vote), but unfortunately I’m surviving in a totalitarian world dictatorship.

In reality the major politicians, including most (if not all) politicians bow down to the CFR. I don’t see how a two-party-state can be considered a democracy, but in reality there is only one party in the USA the Republican-Democrats of CFR.
Members of CFR include: Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, US president Jimmy Carter, US vice-president Dick Cheney, US president Gerald Ford, Chairman Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan, Jesse Jackson, Caroline Kennedy (daughter of JFK), President World bank Robert McNamara, CEO News corporation and Fox News Rupert Murdoch, Secretary of State Collin Powell, CIA director George Tenet, President World bank James Wolfensohn, President World bank Paul Wolfowitz and CIA director James Woolsey.
Here’s a list of (former) members of CFR: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/2474-obama-picks-come-from-same-old-cfr-roster

Then there’s the requirement of freedom of the press, because in reality the media decide who wins the elections. Just to keep it short, there are a total of 6 media companies, that all get their news from Reuters and Associated Press (AP). Rothschild owns Reuters and Reuters owns AP: http://www.rense.com/general90/media.htm
So there you have it: Rothschild (related to Rockefeller) controls the world press, including the American media. So are you going to chose for the politician supported by the media of Rothschild (Hillary Clinton), or the one “criticised” by the media of Rothschild (Donald Trump)?

Another requirement to live in a democracy is the freedom to choose where you buy. In reality the whole economy is owned by only a few families (that are in turn connected to each other).
According to Dean Henderson the Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation. He further concludes that ten banks control the Federal Reserve Bank: Rothschild (London and Berlin), Warburg (Hamburg and Amsterdam), Lehman, Lazard, Kuhn Loeb, Israel Moses Seif, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase. These are almost the families that according to Henderson rule the world; he also names (in the eight families) Rockefeller, Windsor and Savoy: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080

So not only don’t you have a real choice between politicians (of more than one party), but you can’t even choose between companies to buy from.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Exactly. You trust his words instead of assessing his actions. But he has the best words.

And.... your solution is to???? The others openly support it. So yeah, I'm going with the one who has said he is against it. Yup. Sure am.

 

[LibertyEagle]

If we would live in a democracy, I’d be the first to vote (or would at least vote), but unfortunately I’m surviving in a totalitarian world dictatorship.

A democracy, eh? You want mob rule? That is not what we want; we want the republic that we were supposed to have.

 

[Firestarter]

A democracy, eh? You want mob rule? That is not what we want; we want the republic that we were supposed to have.

You/We are in fact ruled by the mafia, mob, however you want to call it.
We are currently still surviving in the aftermath of WW II, the guilty parties (financing both the fascist as the allied forces) have never gotten their punishment. They are currently implementing depopulation Agenda 21: eugenetics genocide, under the guise of health care, and laughing all the way to the bank, while we pay attention to politicians that are implementing their agenda.

 

[CCTelander]

VPs don't sign legislation; Presidents do.

Lyndon Baines Johnson
Gerald R. Ford

 

[Origanalist]

I'm voting Constitution Party

Same here.

 

[Firestarter]

Protocols of Zion

If you want to understand how we are ruled in our dictatorial democracy, you should read the Protocols of the elders of Zion: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ma01/Kidd/thesis/pdf/protocols.pdf
The following sections of the Protocols are especially relevant in connection to our “right to vote” in a one-party-state.

Protocol 5
8. In all ages the people of the world, equally with individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for THEY ARE CONTENT WITH A SHOW and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance.
Therefore we shall establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of their benefit to progress.

Protocol 10
5. TO SECURE THIS WE MUST HAVE EVERYBODY VOTE WITHOUT DISTINCTION OF CLASSES AND QUALIFICATIONS, in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got from the educated propertied classes.
In this way, by inculcating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy among the GOYIM the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off, for the mob, handled by us, will not let them come to the front nor even give them a hearing; it is accustomed to listen to us only who pay it for obedience and attention.
In this way we shall create a blind, mighty force which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents set at its head by us as leaders of the mob. The people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all kinds of benefits.

13. In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some "Panama" or other - then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages and honor connected with the office of president.
The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect presidents, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make changes in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, a puppet in our hands.
Naturally, the authority of the presidents will then become a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him with a means of self-defense in the right of an appeal to the people, for the decision of the people over the heads of their representatives, that is to say, an appeal to that some blind slave of ours - the majority of the mob.
Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defense of the new republican constitution, the right to defend which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution.

 

[Firestarter]

I’ll make some comments on the arguments presented by others.

I'm voting Constitution Party

The candidate in this case seems more "libertarian" than his party, and as far as that's concerned, I think he could be good for liberty. The CP not so much.

Voting for other parties then the Democrat-Republicans Clinton-Trump is maybe somewhat better. But on the other hand this could give us the impression, that politicians are in charge, while in reality we - the people – hold the power because we have strength in numbers.
I know of a few politicians that actually fought against the powerful elite. They didn’t do this to make this world a better place but for selfish (fame and fortune) reasons. They were murdered: Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Jaime Roldos Aguiler, Omar Torrijos, Hugo Chávez, Pim Fortuyn, Jörg Haider, and Gadaffi.
Ché Guevara has made a name for himself as a revolutionary and was executed by the CIA. Maybe he is the one example of a “good” politician, but what speaks against him is that he was pro-communism.

I believe it is so very important that the TPP be stopped, so I will be voting for Trump.

The whole idea of BITs (like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Treaty (TTIP)) is to protect the investments of the wealthy owners of the big corporations in Europe and the USA, by letting the World bank decide how the third world must be exploited, while the rich get richer and richer over the backs of the poor. This is really colonialism under a new name.
Both Trump and Clinton are only protecting the interests of the elite. Both have said they are against the TPP, but are lying through their teeth: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/...eal-that-sanders-clinton-and-trump-all-oppose
For Hillary you only have to look at the NAFTA deal that was signed by then president Bill Clinton and for being an accomplice to the Obama support for TPP: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/37089-is-hillary-double-talking-on-trade-deals
You can look at what Donald Trump officially stands for on the topic of corporations, to know he’s really all for TPP. He states that taxes for corporate must be reduced to 0 (while the slaves have to pay), and because this is one of the main objectives of these BITs, you have to conclude that Trump is for TPP: http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Donald_Trump_Corporations.htm

Serious question. Who's selling liberty out?

Unfortunately we are all selling out: we don’t take a stand for the liberty (of others), and wait for others to make things better (for ourselves).

The Tale That Might Be Told http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2008/02/tale-that-might-be-told.html

This is a nice tale of what could happen if everybody would lose interest in politrics.

I would say anyone voting for the two party system or staying home. With Hilltrump's high unfavorable numbers, there would be a chance that neither get 270 electoral votes. The election would be thrown to the House or Representatives. That would not guarantee a liberty president, but it would at least show that people want better candidates.

Only boycotting election will not all of a sudden make our world the great place some of us would like it to be. We first need to prevent the youth from being brainwashed (by education, media, TV, movies, voice-to-skull technology and psychiatric drugs), maybe they could make the difference that we cannot (because we are already too far gone).

 

[Firestarter]

Clinton and Trump enslaved by debts

There are some that say that Donald Trump is above corruption, because he is already a billionaire so doesn’t need the money. I will not insult your intelligence by explaining how ridiculous such a statement is.
In reality Trump isn’t the rich man he wants us all to believe. Trump has been borrowing all kinds of money, while his career as a “business man” is filled with failures. Trump has borrowed enough money to fool easily impressionable people, but in reality it is the money of others. Here’s a story that tells that Trump is rich in having other people’s money (that should be understood as that he’s enslaved by his financiers): https://italkyoubored.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/has-donald-trump-ever-been-rich/

When somebody tells everybody he’s billionaire, but in reality he’s loaned hundreds of millions, he’s a pathological liar, see the following quote: “A mobster who knew Trump socially said of him once, “He’d lie to you about what time of day it is – just for the practice.””.
According to this story in 1988 Donald Trump was indebted for $20 million. That’s a lot for a simple guy like me, and a complete imbecile like Trump could never have repaid this in an honest way.

It is also known that the Clintons borrowed a lot of money in the Whitewater and Castle Grande investments that they couldn’t pay back. Clearly the Clintons are just too smart for me: borrowing more money to pay off a debt, is something I clearly cannot understand.
There is ample evidence that Hillary Clinton is a complete slave of her financiers. The Obama-Clinton administration has been so good to reward 10 big corporations with 0 federal tax, coincidentally these same corporations – General Electric, Boeing, Verizon, Bank of America, Citigroup, Pfizer, FedEx, Honeywell, Merck, Corning - have been so friendly to finance crooked Hillary’s presidential campaign (this cannot be a coincidence, can it?).
Citigroup got an astonishing 2.5 trillion dollar (that is 2,500,000 million) after the financial crisis, so they really get a bargain for financing Hillary for only 824,000 dollar in this campaign: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/top-10-corporate-tax-avoiders
(archived here: http://archive.is/btrMO)

When criminals, like Clinton and Trump, get on the throne of the American presidency, they will be a puppet in the hands of their financiers.
Donald Trump himself has explained in 2015 how financing politicians really means buying them:

I gave to many people, before this, before two months ago, I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And do you know what? When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me.

https://theintercept.com/2015/07/30/politicians-admitting-obvious-fact-money-affects-vote/

 

[Murray N Rothbard]

It's reversed this year...the "throw away" votes are any vote for the 2 parties. Actually, maybe even GJ is a throw away vote, since he has merely pandered to factions from each of the 2 parties.. I say the more people who write in or vote for obscure parties this year is important. Voting this way is the noticeable way of opting out. Let them know that not only are you intentionally "sitting out" but you went to the effort of voting for someone who has no chance of winning. It's a statement. If there are a record number of people who do this this year I think the primary strategies we see in 2020 and 2024 will be much more favorable to liberty-minded candidates like Rand Paul and Gary Johnson. That is my 2 cents. I'm not a Ted Cruz fan, but as he said, "vote your conscience."

 

[dean.engelhardt]

It's reversed this year...the "throw away" votes are any vote for the 2 parties. Actually, maybe even GJ is a throw away vote, since he has merely pandered to factions from each of the 2 parties.. I say the more people who write in or vote for obscure parties this year is important. Voting this way is the noticeable way of opting out. Let them know that not only are you intentionally "sitting out" but you went to the effort of voting for someone who has no chance of winning. It's a statement. If there are a record number of people who do this this year I think the primary strategies we see in 2020 and 2024 will be much more favorable to liberty-minded candidates like Rand Paul and Gary Johnson. That is my 2 cents. I'm not a Ted Cruz fan, but as he said, "vote your conscience."

Very good point. More than 50% of the nation does not want Clinton/Trump. If we all show up, who knows what could happen:

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/07/21/actually-libertarian-gary-johnson-could-win-the-presidency/

 

[RJB]

Very good point. More than 50% of the nation does not want Clinton/Trump. If we all show up, who knows what could happen:

Diebold?

 

[AuH20]

2008 and 2012 were throwaways and I deviated from both major selections. This year is not a throwaway by any stretch of the imagination. The media and political establishment's shrieking tells me all I need to know about this contest.

 

[Firestarter]

Trump – Obama founder of ISIS

Regularly stories are put on the internet with similar keyword as something I have written to prevent my stories from popping up in internet searches.

Last Friday, August 5, I’ve posted evidence on this forum that ISIS was supported by the Obama-Clinton administration. Just 4 days later Donald Trump helped his good friend Hillary Clinton in an obvious ploy to bury this information by accusing president Obama of being the “founder of ISIS” and “the co-founder would be crooked Hillary Clinton”.
Surely our “democracy” of total corruption needs to be protected by preventing the good, hard working slaves from finding out the truth. I’ve also got evidence that the results of internet searches are manipulated (you could call that censorship). When I searched with Google.nl, Yahoo.com and Duckduckgo.com with “Obama ISIS “crooked Hillary” Clinton “Donald Trump” president”: the speech of Donald Trump gets a lot of results, but my story on this forum isn’t in the search results at all.

I found even more evidence of the support by Hillary Clinton for the terrorist attack on the American consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.
At 7:19 pm, ET in the early stages of the terrorist attack, Jeremy Bash sent an email that forces were identified that could assist the consulate (after they refused to answer his phone call). The deputies of Secretary of State Clinton simply forgot to approve this option.
A former Special Forces member explained to Bryan Suits in a popular radio show in Los Angeles that the Commanders In extreme Force (CIF) were available to help the consulate.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta lied in 2013 that there hadn’t been enough time to get forces to the scene in Benghazi: http://investmentwatchblog.com/new-...send-help-benghazi-proving-leon-panetta-lied/

There is not only evidence that the Obama-Clinton administration supported ISIS in Syria, but also that they helped to create the “IDEAL ATMOSPHERE“ for Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), that later became ISIS, against its “ENEMY, THE DISSENTERS”, again made available by Judicial Watch.
See the following quote from the memo:
“THIS CREATES THE IDEAL ATMOSPHERE FOR AQI TO RETURN TO ITS OLD POCKETS IN MOSUL AND RAMADI, AND WILL PROVIDE A RENEWED MOMENTUM UNDER THE PRESUMPTION OF UNIFYING THE JIHAD AMONG SUNNI IRAQ AND SYRIA, AND THE REST OF THE SUNNIS IN THE ARAB WORLD AGAINST WHAT IT CONSIDERS ONE ENEMY, THE DISSENTERS. ISI COULD ALSO DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE THROUGH ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA, WHICH WILL CREATE GRAVE DANGER IN REGARDS TO UNIFYING IRAQ AND THE PROTECTION OF ITS TERRITORY”.
In August 2012 Hillary Clinton received this intelligence report about the rise of Al Qaeda in Iraq: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...et-memo-stating-obama-admin-support-for-isis/

The campaign team of Hillary Clinton (this includes Donald Trump) just has to make a few more mistakes before I can really make a difference.
I don’t think Hillary Clinton will ever lose the nickname “crooked” again…

 

[Firestarter]

In September 2012 weapons that had belonged to the Libyan army were shipped to Benghazi for Syrian terrorists (information retrieved by Judicial watch). ISIS wasn´t only provided with weapons, but also financed and trained by the CIA (this was revealed by CIA-contractor Steven Kelley). While CIA-agent Edward Snowden has testified that the leader of ISIS Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, was trained by the Israeli Mossad.

I looked further into the claim that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, was trained by the Israeli Mossad. I didn't find the NSA documents from Edward Snowden for evidence. I haven't found evidence that Snowden has said this, but also none that he has denied this.
What is more interesting then Snowden, are the pictures that show a striking resemblance between Al-Baghdadi and the Jewish actor, Mossad agent Simon Elliot: https://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2014/07/15/snowden-al-baghdadi/
See the following photographs of Al-Baghdadi and Simon Elliot, with US senator John McCain and terrorist Muhammed Noor:

More on McCain...
A 3 1/2 minute video was hacked from the cellphone of a staffer of John McCain that shows the making of a ISIS "execution" video in a studio. It appears this is one of the preruns in the execution video of James Foley. Although it looks convincing to me, practically anybody could have reenacted this. Can anybody proof that this was in fact taken from a staffer of McCain in Ukraine?
John McCain said this was a hoax. Here you can read his reply to this video where he also responds that the pictures with Al-Baghdadi are fake (one of these photographs comes from CNN!) and you can watch the video itself.
You can also see a photograph of McCain with Abdelhakim Belhadj, that worked with American and NATO forces in the overthrow of Colonel Gaddafi, and later became the leader of ISIS. Belhadj also headed LIFG which killed US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan: http://www.infowars.com/john-mccain-responds-to-staged-isis-beheading-video/

I still need to investigate the connection between John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Rothschild.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Very good point. More than 50% of the nation does not want Clinton/Trump. If we all show up, who knows what could happen:

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/07/21/actually-libertarian-gary-johnson-could-win-the-presidency/

Assuming you could get all of the "Not Trump- Not Clinton" crowd to all agree on a single candidate. First place is going to be tough. Second place (no consolation prizes though) may be possible since Trump polls about one third of the electorate when the secondary party candidates are included.

 

[Firestarter]

Donald Duck Trump

I have written about the criminality of crooked Hillary Clinton, but unfortunately didn’t give enough attention to the man that wants us all to believe he’s as rich as Scrooge McDuck, but has much more in common with Donald Duck (Trump). I found an interesting collection of some scandals in Trump’s history that almost puts him in league with the Clintons.
Trump’s companies went bankrupt no less than 4 times (this doesn’t even include the bankruptcy scheme with convicted felon George Soros). In 1991 and 1992 Trump’s Taj Mahal and Trump plaza casinos went bankrupt. At this time Donald Duck was already indebted for 900 million dollar. In 2004 Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts went bankrupt with $1.8 billion in debt; in 2009 the newly named Trump Entertainment Resorts went bankrupt a second time. I’m just a simple man: if somebody has gone bankrupt 4 times he doens’t own billions of dollars.
In the 1970s Trump ran some housing sites where blacks were discriminated against. In 1981 he bought another building in New York on Central Park South, where he used every trick in the book to chase the tenants away so he could tear it down and build luxury condos. He had the heat turned off, refused to make repairs and had ads in the newspaper offering to house homeless people.
In 1980 Trump demolished the Bonwit Teller store in New York to build the Trump Tower, for which he hired 200 undocumented Polish workers, that got nothing at all or substandard wages ($5 per hour). In 1991 Trump was convicted for avoiding to pay union pension and welfare contributions for the workers. The decision was appealed, and ultimately settled in 1999.
Since the 1980s Trump has repeatedly had to defend himself in court because he simply had refused to pay employees for services rendered.
Trump has repeatedly been fined for breaking casino rules. Trump once loaned $3.5 million from his father Fred, for which he was fined $30,000. Trump also had to pay $200,000 for keeping black croupiers from the gambling table. In 1986 Trump violated antitrust rules in New Jersey by buying up stock in casinos of the competition, for which he got fined $750,000. Trump also got a fine of $450,000 for breaking rules in buying nine luxury cars.
This information is mostly from the following story: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/donald-trump-scandals/474726/

You must agree it is nothing less than pathetic that Trump sued reporter Tim O’Brien for $5 billion, because he had dared to claim in his book Trump Nation that Donald Duck Trump is only worth $150 to 250 million. Even the court found this so ridiculous, that the law suit was tossed.
But it can get even more idiotic - Trump has sued comedian Bill Maher for $5 million, for claiming that Trump was from an orang-utan father. In this story are also a few tricks of Trump to increase his market value. In 2005 Trump bought a mansion in Palm Beach, for $41 million, and then “sold” it three years later for $100 million. Trump paid $7.9 million for a house which was on the books for $60 million. He bought Albemarle for $6.5 million that was listed for $100 million. Trump calls himself a master in negotiating, but this is nothing else than corruption and creative bookkeeping: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/04/whats-the-deal-with-donald-trump/309261/

The Trump University and the Trump Institute faced law suits from former students that claimed that they had been ripped off with useless materials and worthless lessons. I think these “students” had no right to complain, they should’ve known before enlisting that they could have better watched some Donald Duck cartoons, than listen to lessons about becoming “rich” quick the Donald Trump way. Right here on this forum you can get the lessons for free and it only takes a few minutes to learn.
You make a deal with a group of some 100 likeminded individuals and convince them that the way to go - is to make you a billionaire. Then you – together with your group of 100 - simply start a media campaign that you are worth more than 100 million dollars. If anybody disputes this “fact”, you start a law suit for libel for at least a million dollar (any settlement makes money). The great advantage is that in the second law suit for libel, you can copy/paste 80% of the legal documents.
With your reputation of multimillionaire you borrow as much as you can, which you invest with as much risk as possible. If you go bankrupt, you can simply continue with some new company. At the same time you try to befriend the rich and famous in the hope they will throw you a bone.
Each year you assault the media with ever increasing wealth. You can even sell your name to any company that’s willing to pay.

 

[Firestarter]

Jeffrey Epstein

Meet Jeffrey Edward Epstein: (former) member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission, billionaire, and... paedophile. Epstein has sexually abused large numbers of under-age girls and even had a stable of child prostitutes (as young as 12 years old) to serve his wealthy friends with similar sexual preferences. After a yearlong investigation that started in 2005 20 girls testified they were sexually abused between the ages of 14 and 17 by Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein served a total of 13 months in prison: he was out on “work release” up to 16 hours a day for 6 days a week, so only in for the nights.

Virginia Roberts has testified she served Prince Andrew (of Britain) and lawyer Alan Dershowitz on behalf of Epstein and that the FBI has caught her on tape (Prince Andrew also flew on Trump’s private plane to meet with Epstein). Roberts claims to have been groomed by (daughter of British newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell) Ghislaine Maxwell. Here’s the cosy photograph of Roberts, Prince Andrew and Maxwell in 2001, when Roberts was 17.

While Epstein was “imprisoned” for 13 months, his butler Alfredo Rodriquez was sentenced to 18 months for selling Epstein’s black book public to the highest bidder (Rodriquez has since died). Epstein’s phonebook includes the names of Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, David Rockefeller and Peter Soros (a nephew of George Soros).
I think Epstein should be an important topic in this year’s presidential election.

Epstein was such good friends with the family Clinton that he co-founded the “philanthropic” Clinton Foundation, but after Epstein was convicted as a sex offender, the Clintons suddenly never knew him: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rmer-president-plea-bargain-negotiations.html

But there’s much more. Bill Clinton has flied at least 26 times on the private jet of Epstein, even to his private sex island (Little St. James in the Virgin Islands), were minor girls were sexually abused. Also on the jet sexual intercourse with young girls was frequent. Clinton had pleasant journeys with “Janice” and “Jessica” on 4 occasions, with “one female” and also Chauntae Davies. Virginia Roberts has testified she saw Bill Clinton at a private party with Epstein and two 17 year old girls: http://hotair.com/archives/2016/05/13/bill-clinton-took-26-flights-with-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein/

While the Clintons have flatly denied their long lasting friendship with Epstein, the previously mentioned recruiter and girlfriend of Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, was at the wedding of their daughter Chelsea Clinton in 2010: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Epstein-s-social-fixer-Chelsea-s-wedding.html
See the photograph.

Paula Jones filed a law suit against Bill Clinton for sexually harassing her in 1991. Bill Clinton paid her an out of court settlement of 850,000 dollar and an additional 90,000 dollar for perjury (that sounds like a lot of money, but most of it went to the attorneys): http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/jones111498.htm
Juanita Broaddrick claims she was raped by Bill Clinton in 1978 when she was 35 years old: http://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrick
There have been at least 14 women that claim they were sexually harassed by Bill Clinton: http://www.dailywire.com/news/1344/...-clinton-sexually-abused-amanda-prestigiacomo

Donald Trump is also connected to Jeffrey Epstein; this is what he said about this “terrific guy” (back in 2002 when he wasn’t convicted yet):

I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy, he's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.

After Epstein was sentenced as a level 3 sex offender, Trump suddenly denied that they had been close friends. Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother, testified in 2009 that Trump flew on Jeffrey's private jet at least once and according to a story in Vanity Fair in 2002 Trump periodically dined at Epstein’s home (Trump denied these allegations). In November 2004 Donald Trump called Epstein on 2 occasions: https://news.vice.com/article/the-salacious-ammo-even-donald-trump-wont-use-in-a-fight-against-hillary-clinton-bill-clinton

There’s also a law suit of “Katie Johnson” (a pseudonym) for rape by both Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in New York in 1994 when she was 13 years of age. This has been confirmed by witness “Tiffany Doe”. The law suit was first thrown out of court for technicalities, but has been filed again: http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/

We can rule out that the Clintons and Donald Trump didn’t know that Jeffrey Epstein was a pimp for underage prostitutes.
The connection between the Clintons, Donald Trump and (Prince Andrew of) the British Royal family also puts the “independence” of the USA in doubt.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

[h=2]

Boycott the elections[/h]

There are other choices too.

[h=1]#JillNotHill will be keeping Hillary up at night[/h]

Green Party’s Jill Stein Selects Human-Rights Activist Ajamu Baraka as Running Mate


[h=2][/h]

 

[Firestarter]

Goldman Sachs

The connection between both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and Goldman Sachs is interesting on its own.

First the connection with crooked Hillary Clinton.
Clinton has been paid (read: bribed) $675,000 in 2013 by Goldman Sachs for 3 speeches. Bill Clinton received $1,550,000 for speaking on meetings of Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Goldman Sachs gave $169,850 to Clinton’s presidential campaign and super PAC.
There is even a stronger connection with Marc Mezvinsky, who married Chelsea the daughter of Bill and Hillary Clinton in 2010, and worked at Goldman Sachs for 8 years. Bennett Grau (also of Goldman Sachs) set up the Eaglevale hedge fund together with Mezvinsky and Mark Mallon (of Goldman Sachs) with help from Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein: https://www.rt.com/usa/344657-clinton-goldman-sachs-money/

Eaglevale lost 90% of its investments because of unsuccessful bets in Greece and had to shut down because losing all this money. Ironically it was Goldman Sachs that played a big part in bankrupting Greece, by lending 2.8 billion euro that had to be paid back almost double to 5.1 billion euro: http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/...y-greek-debt-deals-that-hobbled-that-country/
There are even many Goldman Sachs employees in important positions in the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton administration: https://prof77.wordpress.com/politi...o-the-obama-government-including-elena-kagan/

Then the connection between Donald Duck Trump and Goldman Sachs.
According to the following story Trump is indebted to Goldman Sachs for at least $650 million. Probably Americans will be more worried that Trump is also indebted to the Bank of China: http://therightscoop.com/beholden-to-no-one-trump-owes-650-million-to-china-and-goldman-sachs/
Donald Trump has gotten together some of the big shots from Goldman Sachs to help him get money, to prevent him from going bankrupt before the elections: https://www.mintpressnews.com/american-greed-trumps-economic-team-whos-whats-wrong/219341/

The most important name on his financial team is John Paulson (of Goldman Sachs), who made over $5 billion by betting against his own clients, while participating in crashing the American mortgage markets. After making billions of dollars Goldman Sachs paid $550 million to settle fraud charges with the SEC and had the Frenchman Fabrice Tourre convicted for this multibillion crime. This scheme bankrupted the Dutch ABN AMRO bank and Royal Bank of Scotland, and because somebody had to pay, it were the Dutch and British taxpayers that paid for the losses: http://www.gregpalast.com/the-frog-who-crushed-the-planet-did-a-french-uppie-really-create-the-finance-crisis/

Another interesting name is that of Steven Mnuchin, who made his fortune at Goldman Sachs, before becoming CEO at Soros Fund Management. In 2009, Mnuchin got together with a group of investors that included George Soros and John Paulson to buy the IndyMac Bank that had been shut down in 2008. After they renamed it OneWest Bank it was sold a few years later with a profit of billions. George Soros was also involved in the bankruptcy fraud with the General Motors Building with Trump and publicly supports Hillary. Even Mnuchin in the past has donated heavily to Hillary Clinton’s election campaigns: https://www.thenation.com/article/the-worst-of-wall-street-meet-donald-trumps-finance-chairman/

The most interesting on Steve Bannon from Goldman Sachs is that his Bannon and Co. was bought by Rothschild bank Société Générale: http://fortune.com/2016/08/17/donald-trump-bannon-mnuchin-goldman/

If you think that it’s wrong that the Democrat-Republicans follow orders from Goldman Sachs, you better not vote for Clinton or Trump.