Boston Mayor to Outlaw Chick-Fil-A

KingNothing said:
You've either got to be completely against State sanctioned marriages, or in favor of any consenting adult marrying another consenting adult. There should be no in between.
Click to expand...

What about polygamy? Are these same gays pushing for this state sanctioned married too? Sister/brother?
 
Danke said:
What about polygamy? Are these same gays pushing for this state sanctioned married too? Sister/brother?
Click to expand...

Hey I'm for multiple wives, really, I see it being a great asset for the family, but it's not for everyone. just saying, not against it.
 
Nickels said:
why not just stop registering marriages? Taxes and social security were not designed for married people, so why wait on that?
Click to expand...

There are a lot of benefits for married couples. And surviving spouses do get SS. Along with other government pensions.
 
Sola_Fide said:
It's hard to define, but its the pro-abortion, salvation-comes-through-science, every-lifestyle-is-equal, reddit types.
Click to expand...
No...not science and equality! Tell me it isn't so!

shocked_meme1.png
 
Nickels said:
when people like jmdrake who are married and registered actually unregister their marriages or register a divorce, I'll take these arguments seriously. Why don't people put their license and marriage where their mouth claims to be?
Click to expand...

Because some people married before they cared. You can't just go up to your wife or husband and say, "Honey, I want a divorce, but it's for the principle of the thing." I haven't been married yet. If I ever do get married, I will seriously discuss the idea of not getting a license with my spouse, provided she is up for it.

Regardless, though, I think you are missing my point. It's not about equality. It's about the role of government in marriage. Please don't focus on the false dichotomy of hetero vs. homo marriage, and ask yourself, why should we have marriage licenses at all? As long as you and I agree that the government, first and foremost, should get out of any marriage, I don't care what you do.
 
cstarace said:
No...not science and equality! Tell me it isn't so!

shocked_meme1.png
Click to expand...

It's not science or equality, that is the entire point.

It's not science, because science without a basis in the Christian worldview is the means for tyranny, and not equality because it is one thing to believe in freedom for every lifestyle and another thing to endorse every lifestyle.
 
Last edited:
Just got home from work , have had some lasagna, a chicken wing , three tall Boys , but sure would like a chicken sandwich ...
 
Danke said:
What about polygamy? Are these same gays pushing for this state sanctioned married too? Sister/brother?
Click to expand...


What does it matter to you whom anyone else chooses to marry?

If they're consenting adults, stop being a butt-insky.
 
KingNothing said:
What does it matter to you whom anyone else chooses to marry?

If they're consenting adults, stop being a butt-insky.
Click to expand...

Only thing that matters to me is more debasement of the currency by ever increasing government expenditures. I'm not saying anything about the behavior of consenting adults. You're not too bright, are you?
 
Danke said:
Only thing that matters to me is more debasement of the currency by ever increasing government expenditures. I'm not saying anything about the behavior of consenting adults. You're not too bright, are you?
Click to expand...

Brighter than you are, dude. Brighter than you.
 
Sola_Fide said:
It's not science or equality, that is the entire point.

It's not science, because science without a basis in the Christian worldview is the means for tyranny, and not equality because it is one thing to believe in freedom for every lifestyle and another thing to endorse every lifestyle.
Click to expand...
It isn't the government's role to endorse any lifestyle. Science certainly doesn't endorse anything other than logic and reason, and most importantly, presents us with FACTS. Explain to me how science without a Christian worldview (they contradict each other) leads to tyranny?
 
cstarace said:
It isn't the government's role to endorse any lifestyle. Science certainly doesn't endorse anything other than logic and reason, and most importantly, presents us with FACTS. Explain to me how science without a Christian worldview (they contradict each other) leads to tyranny?
Click to expand...

You seriously can't understand the difference between these two statements:

A. People with different lifestyles should be free to pursue how they want to live

and

B. Every lifestyle is equally preferable


We are not talking about government here, we are talking about the philosophical view of an atheist egalitarian. Do you not see the difference between the two statements above?


The other question about science needing a sufficient foundation for morality else it becomes oppressive and evil is so utterly self-evident from the past 100 years of history that I don't even need to cite examples.
 
Last edited:
Strip Clubs are perfectly legal and gun stores bring in added revenue. But Chick-Fil-A is pure evil!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Voluntarist
Gear Up For Your Next Boycott: Chick-fil-A
Replies
9
Views
741
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Anti Federalist
Chick-fil-A CEO urges white people to find strangers, 'shine their shoes' to combat racism
2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
misterx
M
Anti Federalist
Boston Mayor Declares Racism a ‘Public Health Crisis’ in the City
Replies
2
Views
341
AngryCanadian
A
Anti Federalist
Chick-Fil-A Donates to Extremist Southern Poverty Law Center
Replies
16
Views
2K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Swordsmyth
Chick-fil-A Put an Obama and Hillary Supporter in Charge, but Dumped Christians
Replies
6
Views
430
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Back
Top