BOOM. The Two Sites Depape was "posting" on for "months" were made on Fri., deleted Saturday!

Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
2,959
BOOM. The Two Sites Depape was "posting" on for "months" were made on Fri., deleted Saturday!

SOOO busted! This entire false flag unraveled in record time, three days tops.


This is huge... now means that this was set up to demonize conservatives from the start. This investigation should now take an entirely different turn.

EXCLUSIVE: Two Far-Right Websites Attributed to David DePape to Smear Conservatives Were FABRICATED - They Were Created Friday and Deleted Saturday (thegatewaypundit.com)


LA Times also reported as well on the websites.

In the months before police accused him of attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband Friday morning, David DePape had been drifting further into the world of far-right conspiracies, antisemitism and hate, according to a Times review of his online accounts.

frenly-frens-10-28-1733-wayback.jpg


 
Last edited:
What do you know? They've really improved prisoners' computer access in the San Francisco jail. :rolleyes:
 
Totally incorrect conclusion. DePape's site was started in early September. I am surprised Gateway Pundit made such a laughable conclusion.
Internet Wayback only scrapes sites intermittently. Especially relatively new ones with low traffic.
 
Totally incorrect conclusion. DePape's site was started in early September. I am surprised Gateway Pundit made such a laughable conclusion.
Internet Wayback only scrapes sites intermittently. Especially relatively new ones with low traffic.

Yeah, Gateway Pundit is not a reliable source.
 
I wonder how quick the entire episode gets memory holed as the October surprise unravels.

The narrative about the Maga perp will fade fast, like right after the election. The memory hole in old man Pelosi’s head will not be forgotten by him or his family as fast.

It is tragic, and to a certain extent, I blame the cops who stood there while it happened, despite how much the Police Chief praises them. Policy and procedure was followed. Excellent work.

If it wasn't for policy and procedure, maybe instead of barking commands, probably with guns drawn, they would have immediately rushed in and grabbed the hammer and the perp.
 
Totally incorrect conclusion. DePape's site was started in early September. I am surprised Gateway Pundit made such a laughable conclusion.
Internet Wayback only scrapes sites intermittently. Especially relatively new ones with low traffic.

So, help me out here. If this was a one-time "scrape", how were those ten "snapshots" of the site taken? What does that indicates?

godisloving-1652-1-e1667100616965.jpg


frenly-frens-10-28-1733-wayback-e1667100724432.jpg
 
So, help me out here. If this was a one-time "scrape", how were those ten "snapshots" of the site taken? What does that indicates?

It means that on those particular dates, at those particular times, the relevant URL was archived by the Wayback Machine.

The absence of any snapshots prior to those dates/times indicates nothing about the prior (non-)existence of the site.
 
It means that on that particular date, at those particular times, the relevant URL was archived by the Wayback Machine.

The absence of any snapshots prior to those dates/times indicates nothing about the prior (non-)existence of the site.

Thanks. That makes sense.
 
Back
Top