BOOM: Jeffrey Epstein Arrested For Sex Trafficking Minors

[jmdrake]

Jeffrey Epstein has been arrested for sex trafficking minors, marking another major step forward in law enforcement’s recent push to bust elite pedophile rings. (READ: ‘CRIME BOSS’: The Story of The NXIVM Cult’s Links To Clinton, Schumer, and Gillibrand).
The Daily Beast reports: Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was arrested for allegedly sex trafficking dozens of minors in New York and Florida between 2002 and 2005, and will appear in court in New York on Monday, according to three law enforcement sources. The arrest, by the FBI-NYPD Crimes Against Children Task Force, comes about 12 years after the 66-year-old financier essentially got a slap on the wrist for allegedly molesting dozens of underage girls in Florida…
Several employees and associates allegedly recruited the girls for Epstein’s abuse, and some victims eventually became recruiters themselves, according to law enforcement. The girls were as young as 14, and Epstein knew they were underage, according to details of the arrest and indictment shared by two officials.
Daily Beast passage ends


More at: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/breaking-jeffrey-epstein-arrested-for-sex-trafficking-minors/

Weird. I thought he was already in prison.

Because everyone who ever met him is guilty?

1) You article cites links between Epstein and Clinton, Schumer, and Gillibrand and yet you want to ignore the link to Trump. You can't have it both ways, guilt by association when it's Clinton, Schumer and Gillibrand but "You aren't responsible for your friends" when it's Trump.

2) Trump called Epstein a "terrific guy" who likes beautiful women "on the younger side."

https://nypost.com/2016/10/09/the-s...xposed-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epstein/

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years,” Trump said. “Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

 

[Sammy]

Sad Day for the Democratic Party!

 

[UWDude]

First, if you think I've never posted anything about Epstein and Clinton then you've not been paying attention over my years of posting here. Second, everyone knows about Clinton and Epstein by now and no one defends it so what's the point of still posting about it? The left just acts like it doesn't exist. You guys however twist yourselves up trying to deflect from what is plainly obvious to many of us who have researched into this topic and aren't still mesmerized by the left/right false choice...Trump was also involved in that mess.

I am sure I can find you on leftist boards.
I am sure you are posting about Trumps "connections" to Epstein on those leftist boards right now.
I am sure you never posted about Epstein Clinton connections on those leftist boards.

XD

POST HARDER AS YOUR WORLDVIEW CRUMBLES!!!

You know what your problem is? Why nobody seems to care what you post?
You are only posting like, 500 - 1000 words per post, with only about a dozen links at best, and maybe a dozen pictures.

Now if you REALLY want to BREAK THE CONDITIONING you need to post at least FIVE THOUSAND WORDS with AT LEAST FIFTY links, and AT LEAST TWO DOZEN pictures per post.

 

[devil21]

I am sure I can find you on leftist boards.
I am sure you are posting about Trumps "connections" to Epstein on those leftist boards right now.
I am sure you never posted about Epstein Clinton connections on those leftist boards.

XD

POST HARDER AS YOUR WORLDVIEW CRUMBLES!!!

You know what your problem is? Why nobody seems to care what you post?
You are only posting like, 500 - 1000 words per post, with only about a dozen links at best, and maybe a dozen pictures.

Now if you REALLY want to BREAK THE CONDITIONING you need to post at least FIVE THOUSAND WORDS with AT LEAST FIFTY links, and AT LEAST TWO DOZEN pictures per post.

It's usually those that lash out wildly in posts like yours that are finding their own worldview crumbling. Viciously attacking the messenger instead the message. That is the Trumpkin creed, after all. You're taking a lot of this very, very personally for some reason and seem to take it more personally by the day. Perhaps take a break from the net?

You want a picture? Here ya go:

 

[TheCount]

1) You article cites links between Epstein and Clinton, Schumer, and Gillibrand and yet you want to ignore the link to Trump. You can't have it both ways, guilt by association when it's Clinton, Schumer and Gillibrand but "You aren't responsible for your friends" when it's Trump.

It's hard to maintain belief in the Trump mythology when there's ample evidence that he's no different from any of the rest.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

It's hard to maintain belief in the Trump mythology when there's ample evidence that he's no different from any of the rest.

Those were his views from 20 years ago. I'm sure he studied the matter and believes the opposite now.

 

[dannno]

Weird. I thought he was already in prison.

Well it's obvious from your post you don't pay much attention to this topic.

He got a slap on the wrist for molesting a couple underage girls, and they redacted all of the evidence in the case from public record. That is what Mike Cernovich's lawsuit is about, getting the evidence un-redacted.

1) You article cites links between Epstein and Clinton, Schumer, and Gillibrand and yet you want to ignore the link to Trump. You can't have it both ways, guilt by association when it's Clinton, Schumer and Gillibrand but "You aren't responsible for your friends" when it's Trump.

2) Trump called Epstein a "terrific guy" who likes beautiful women "on the younger side."

https://nypost.com/2016/10/09/the-s...xposed-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epstein/

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years,” Trump said. “Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

Trump also distanced himself from Epstein, saying that Bill Clinton could be in a lot of trouble over Epstein's Island. Why would he be talking about that unprompted if it implicated him??



He also banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago for hitting on an underage girl.

Trump does not ever appear on the flight manifest of the Lolita Express, yet Bill Clinton does over 20 times!! The idea that they took him off the manifests and not Bill Clinton is patently ridiculous.

What happened was Epstein befriended Trump, I'm sure he's a charming dude, and tried to get him to go to his island. Showed up to parties, shmoozed. That's Epstein's job, to lure rich and powerful people to his island to get dirt on them. Trump refused. End of story.

 

[TheCount]

Those were his views from 20 years ago. I'm sure he studied the matter and believes the opposite now.

Oh yeah. He really seems like the sort of person who has grown and changed over time.

 

[TER]

Well it's obvious from your post you don't pay much attention to this topic.

He got a slap on the wrist for molesting a couple underage girls, and they redacted all of the evidence in the case from public record. That is what Mike Cernovich's lawsuit is about, getting the evidence un-redacted.






Trump also distanced himself from Epstein, saying that Bill Clinton could be in a lot of trouble over Epstein's Island. Why would he be talking about that unprompted if it implicated him??



He also banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago for hitting on an underage girl.

Trump does not ever appear on the flight manifest of the Lolita Express, yet Bill Clinton does over 20 times!! The idea that they took him off the manifests and not Bill Clinton is patently ridiculous.

What happened was Epstein befriended Trump, I'm sure he's a charming dude, and tried to get him to go to his island. Showed up to parties, shmoozed. That's Epstein's job, to lure rich and powerful people to his island to get dirt on them. Trump refused. End of story.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to dannno again

 

[Swordsmyth]

1) You article cites links between Epstein and Clinton, Schumer, and Gillibrand and yet you want to ignore the link to Trump. You can't have it both ways, guilt by association when it's Clinton, Schumer and Gillibrand but "You aren't responsible for your friends" when it's Trump.

2) Trump called Epstein a "terrific guy" who likes beautiful women "on the younger side."

https://nypost.com/2016/10/09/the-s...xposed-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epstein/

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years,” Trump said. “Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

Trump banned Epstein from Mar-A-Lago and he has hinted at his crimes many times while avoiding getting himself ostracized by the NYC/DC/Hollywood Dems who could have given him trouble in his businesses and Trump's administration is now bringing Epstein to justice.

None of that is true about the other people you mention.

 

[jmdrake]

Well it's obvious from your post you don't pay much attention to this topic.

No need for me to keep up with all the perverts. That's your job.

Trump also distanced himself from Epstein, saying that Bill Clinton could be in a lot of trouble over Epstein's Island. Why would he be talking about that unprompted if it implicated him??

Are you asking me to explain Trump? Seriously? Trump does a lot of stupid things. And Gary Hart asked people to follow him when he knew he was having an affair.

He also banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago for hitting on an underage girl.

He called Epstein a terrific guy after kicking him off the island. And from what I read it wasn't a ban.

Trump does not ever appear on the flight manifest of the Lolita Express, yet Bill Clinton does over 20 times!! The idea that they took him off the manifests and not Bill Clinton is patently ridiculous.

Is Schumer on the "Lolita Express" manifest? Is Gillibrand?

Edit: And you apparently missed this.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/07/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-trump.html
Epstein, 64, was a regular for several years at Mar-a-Lago. Testimony in a prior court case indicated that Trump flew at least once on one of the planes Epstein owned and Trump’s phone numbers were in Epstein’s personal phone directory.

What happened was Epstein befriended Trump, I'm sure he's a charming dude, and tried to get him to go to his island. Showed up to parties, shmoozed. That's Epstein's job, to lure rich and powerful people to his island to get dirt on them. Trump refused. End of story.

That's your biased interpretation of what happened. What we know for a fact is that Trump knew Epstein like them "on the young side" and Trump still called him a "terrific guy." Considering the fact that Trump also prefers younger women, he's much older than Melania for example, his comment about Epstein means more than "He likes women more than 10 years younger than him."

 

[jmdrake]

Trump banned Epstein from Mar-A-Lago and he has hinted at his crimes many times while avoiding getting himself ostracized by the NYC/DC/Hollywood Dems who could have given him trouble in his businesses and Trump's administration is now bringing Epstein to justice.

None of that is true about the other people you mention.

He called him a "terrific guy" after kicking him off the island. That is not true of the other people I mentioned.

Edit: And FYI, I read the original story (can't find it now) of the supposed "ban." Trump only banned Epstein because Epstein was dumb enough to go after the daughter of one of Trump's rich friends. Epstein's recruitment of a 16 year old that Trump was paying $9 an hour as a locker room attendant didn't result in a ban.

 

[Swordsmyth]

He called him a "terrific guy" after kicking him off the island. That is not true of the other people I mentioned.

As part of a dig where he alluded to his crimes.

 

[jmdrake]

As part of a dig where he alluded to his crimes.

So....you take a "dig" at someone by calling him a "terrific guy?"

 

[Swordsmyth]

So....you take a "dig" at someone by calling him a "terrific guy?"

You can.

Like this: I think O'Bummer is a terrific guy, real terrific, probably one of the best presidents the globalists have ever had.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Epstein once bragged he cofounded the Clinton Foundation. Meaning he set it up as a money laundering operation? Was Epstein an employee and child sex trafficking a part of its income stream?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Team of federal prosecutors, some of whom are with the public corruption unit, assigned to Jeffrey Epstein case

 

[timosman]

So....you take a "dig" at someone by calling him a "terrific guy?"

 

[specsaregood]

Trump banned Epstein from Mar-A-Lago and he has hinted at his crimes many times while avoiding getting himself ostracized by the NYC/DC/Hollywood Dems who could have given him trouble in his businesses and Trump's administration is now bringing Epstein to justice.

None of that is true about the other people you mention.

The lawyer for a number of the victims praises trump.
Jump to 5 minutes:

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80?t=296

 

[UWDude]

It's usually those that lash out wildly in posts like yours that are finding their own worldview crumbling. Viciously attacking the messenger instead the message. That is the Trumpkin creed, after all. You're taking a lot of this very, very personally for some reason and seem to take it more personally by the day. Perhaps take a break from the net?

You want a picture? Here ya go:

I am very happy about the Epstein arrest, and quite happy about what it implies, and have no fear about it meaning Trump is going to prison for child rape. You will not find me spamming walls of texts, links and pictures, trying to convince the world that this is all about the Clintons. I know exactly what this is all about, and all of us who KNOW that PIZZAGATE IS REAL know exactly what this means.