From 1,355 architects and engineers for 9/11 truth -
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home.html
BTW 1,355 is A LOT considering they have nothing to gain by coming out for 9/11 truth and everything to lose.
As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:
1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front
10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples
14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”
WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:
1. Rapid onset of "collapse"
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a second before the building's destruction
3.Symmetrical "structural failure" -- through the path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
7. Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY
In the the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:
8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
10. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples
WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never "collapsed".
As you can see from the picture below WTC 7 was two city blocks away from the twin towers. Little debris fell on it and the buildings to its left and right DID NOT collapse. Even WTC 4 and 5 which were much closer to the twin towers did not collapse.
Even if ALL the debris from the twin towers collapsed on WTC 7 it would not collapse at free speed (as shown below on left, the right is a standard controlled demolition).
Hundreds of people including many firefighters, police officers, and news reporters heard and saw bombs going off in the buildings. Here are a few of hundreds of those eyewitness testimonies below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_testimony
YouTube - Firemen Explosion Testimony
YouTube - NIST Explosions
YouTube - Audible Explosion at South Tower Collapse
In this video top chemical engineer Mark Basile discusses how he found thermite in the World Trade Center dust using the scientific method.
YouTube - 9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE Mark Basile Chemical Engineer.m4v
The official story said WTC building 7 collapsed because of fire. This building in Bejing did not collapse despite being totally engulfed in flames.
\
YouTube - CCTV/TVCC fire in Beijing (HD version) 北京央视大楼ç€ç« - close-up of fire explosion
Meanwhile building 7 with small isolated fires collapsed at free fall speed, defying the laws of physics.
YouTube - CBS - Rare footage of north side of WTC7 on fire
As engineer Jeff Becker so bravely said in a West Virginia senatorial debate last month... "The only way for the official story to make sense is if the laws of physics had changed on that day".
YouTube - W.Virginia Candidate Jeff Becker Questions WTC 7 Collapse in Senate Debate on C-SPAN
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/n...07&en=a2c62eb2b42cf30c&ex=1385874000&adxnnl=1
http://www.prisonplanet.com/agency_...t_around_a_plane_crashing_into_a_building.htm
There was a planned drill that day so there would be confusion and Dick Cheney could give NORAD the orders to stand down with no repercussions.
YouTube - Dick Cheney Gave Stand Down Orders on 9/11
According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Anwar Al-Awlaki was #3 in Al Qaeda at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Interestingly enough Anwar Al-Awlaki had dinner at the Pentagon months after 9/11 with top members of the military.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/10/20/al-qaeda-terror-leader-dined-pentagon-months/
And here are the official documents proving it -
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/awlaki.pdf
And the CIA has admitted to making fake Bin Laden videos...
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/05/cia_group_had_wacky_ideas_to_d.html
Still believe the official story?