Bombshell: FEMA Camps Confirmed

ericsnow

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
383
10conspiracy.jpg


Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory Proves FEMA Camps Exist for American Citizens in New Episode that Airs Friday, Nov. 12 10 PM EST / 9 PM CST Only on TruTV

This powerful episode is the largest and most in-depth investigation into FEMA camps ever aired on television. Radio host and filmmaker Alex Jones returns to the series yet again, as the team takes you to confirmed on-the-ground facilities, confronts the legislators who authorized FEMA camps and breaks down the full-scale technologically-integrated police state that includes Fusion Centers, FEMA, the Department of Homeland Security and more.

At one of many real and verified FEMA locations, Jesse Ventura and Alex Jones approach a “Residential Center” run by Homeland Security in central Texas where they find locked doors, double-fences and escape warnings around the entire perimeter. Further inside the facility, they witness a playground complex, swings and slides for children. The crew walks up to the front door and attempts to get some answers. But the officials refuse to either confirm or deny the facility’s purpose, including whether or not American citizens are being held inside. However, our past investigations into this facility reveal that it has confined both children and adults, including immigrants, refugee seekers and American citizens.

http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-fema-camps-confirmed/

YouTube - Bombshell: FEMA Camps Confirmed
 
Last edited:
shades of nazi germany returning or poor new orleans during katrina part two?
despite DECISION POINTS being topical, or because its a topical whitewash from
the oval office, we must keep in mind America saw people dehydrating in front
of the tv cameras as we witnessed the aftermath of the devastation in louisiana.
 
As did Ron Paul.

Ron Paul is not a reputable scientific investigative journal.

How can you possibly "debunk" concentration camps? You can prove they exist, as they appear to have done here, or you can't prove they exist.. but it would be impossible to prove that they don't exist.
 
So there are secret camps set up to hold millions of people around this country and we're led to believe they don't exist; that if they do exist they're for our own good?

lol
 
Even if Popular Mechanics disproved some or (unlikely) all of the evidence that there was for FEMA camps in a past article, there is no reason why new information cannot turn up later that proves that they do exist. It appears this documentary is filled with new information, however if you doubt that the past evidence for camps and related legislation is strong evidence that they have something in the works, I recommend you go back and do more research before the show airs on Friday.
 
As did Ron Paul.

If you learn anything from Rand Paul's victory in KY it's this. Sometimes to be politically viable politicians don't always say what they believe. I know that's shocking to some, but it's true. Ron Paul was asked after the 2008 election was over why didn't come "come out with the truth about 9/11". He said, and I'm quoting "Because that would be too controversial to me." If he really believed the official story about 9/11 he could have said "I've already come out with the truth about 9/11". And no, I won't post a link here on the main forum and violate the spirit of the forum rules. But you can do a search and find the video of this if you are interested.

Anyway, it doesn't matter. The same people who try to "debunk" 9/11 and FEMA also call the North American Union (something Ron Paul has talked about openly) a "conspiracy theory". And they are the same idiots who claim Oswald acted alone. Actually these people aren't idiots. They just think you are.
 
9/11 wasn't done by the government, Oswald did act alone, and I highly doubt there are FEMA concentration camps (although I will watch the video in this thread and see if it changes my opinion in a bit).

EDIT: The short video in the thread didn't give any proof, but it looks interesting. I'll probably watch the real show to see if there's actually any real proof.
 
Last edited:
9/11 wasn't done by the government

From 1,355 architects and engineers for 9/11 truth - http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home.html

BTW 1,355 is A LOT considering they have nothing to gain by coming out for 9/11 truth and everything to lose.

explo2.jpg

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:
1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front
10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples
14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”


911_wtc7_20001c.png

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:
1. Rapid onset of "collapse"
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a second before the building's destruction
3.Symmetrical "structural failure" -- through the path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
7. Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:
8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
10. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never "collapsed".

As you can see from the picture below WTC 7 was two city blocks away from the twin towers. Little debris fell on it and the buildings to its left and right DID NOT collapse. Even WTC 4 and 5 which were much closer to the twin towers did not collapse.
wtc-building-7-map_2.jpg


Even if ALL the debris from the twin towers collapsed on WTC 7 it would not collapse at free speed (as shown below on left, the right is a standard controlled demolition).

wtc7vsdemo2mb2.gif


Hundreds of people including many firefighters, police officers, and news reporters heard and saw bombs going off in the buildings. Here are a few of hundreds of those eyewitness testimonies below.

Research in eyewitness testimony is mostly considered a subfield within legal psychology, however it is a field with very broad implications. Human reports are normally based on visual perception, which is generally held to be very reliable (if not irrefutable).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_testimony

YouTube - Firemen Explosion Testimony
YouTube - NIST Explosions
YouTube - Audible Explosion at South Tower Collapse

In this video top chemical engineer Mark Basile discusses how he found thermite in the World Trade Center dust using the scientific method.

YouTube - 9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE Mark Basile Chemical Engineer.m4v

The official story said WTC building 7 collapsed because of fire. This building in Bejing did not collapse despite being totally engulfed in flames.
\YouTube - CCTV/TVCC fire in Beijing (HD version) 北京央视大楼着火 - close-up of fire explosion

Meanwhile building 7 with small isolated fires collapsed at free fall speed, defying the laws of physics.
YouTube - CBS - Rare footage of north side of WTC7 on fire

As engineer Jeff Becker so bravely said in a West Virginia senatorial debate last month... "The only way for the official story to make sense is if the laws of physics had changed on that day".
YouTube - W.Virginia Candidate Jeff Becker Questions WTC 7 Collapse in Senate Debate on C-SPAN

Newly disclosed Port Authority documents suggested that the towers were designed to withstand the kind of airplane strike that they suffered on Sept. 11.

The Port Authority officials and outside engineers involved in designing the buildings suggested that the designers considered an accidental crash only by slower aircraft, moving at less than 200 miles per hour. The newly disclosed documents, from the 1960's, show that the Port Authority considered aircraft moving at 600 m.p.h., slightly faster and therefore more destructive than the ones that did hit the towers, Dr. Sunder said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/n...07&en=a2c62eb2b42cf30c&ex=1385874000&adxnnl=1

By JOHN J. LUMPKIN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/agency_...t_around_a_plane_crashing_into_a_building.htm

There was a planned drill that day so there would be confusion and Dick Cheney could give NORAD the orders to stand down with no repercussions.
YouTube - Dick Cheney Gave Stand Down Orders on 9/11

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Anwar Al-Awlaki was #3 in Al Qaeda at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Interestingly enough Anwar Al-Awlaki had dinner at the Pentagon months after 9/11 with top members of the military.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/10/20/al-qaeda-terror-leader-dined-pentagon-months/

And here are the official documents proving it - http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/awlaki.pdf

And the CIA has admitted to making fake Bin Laden videos...

Two former CIA officials have admitted to creating a fake video in which intelligence officers dressed up as Osama Bin Laden and his cronies in an effort to defame the terrorist leader throughout the middle east.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/05/cia_group_had_wacky_ideas_to_d.html

Still believe the official story?
 
Last edited:
Yes, I still believe that Al Qaeda did 9/11. I've seen all of that evidence from your side, and I've seen all of it from the other side. I still believe that the government was not involved.
 
Alex Jones sure knows how to pimp. That was basically a promo for an upcoming show. He must take his audience for fools.

Now he has David Icke on his show. He must have figured out fast that you don't alienate a large section of the conspiracy crowd if you want to make mega bank.

Then:
YouTube - The "Turd in a punch bowl" remark.
Now:
YouTube - David Icke: Humanity's Last Chance - Alex Jones Tv 1/5

David Icke, the Reptilians guy. I'll never take him seriously.
 
Back
Top