Boko Haram Kidnaps Girls Because... Climate Change

"Climate Change is Real and is Happening Now, People".
John Cook & Skeptical Science, (the impartial observers in matters of climate change) here debunk the Big Oil-funded (and evil) denier claims of a so-called 'pause' - by the clever use of the 'escalator'.

 

Did you even read those links? 2 of them straight up say why mars appears to be in menopause while showign it has nothing to do with our version of climate change.

Let me link you an actually scientific paper instead of articles that over generalize facts

http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/464/2094/1387.abstract
 
RPFs ate my homework. I had a nice long point about climate change perception and it went poof.

As for Mars going through menopause, good on you for pretending I said "Mars is getting hotter."

There have been changes around the south pole (Planum Australe) over the past few Martian years. In 1999 the Mars Global Surveyor photographed pits in the layer of frozen carbon dioxide at the Martian south pole. Because of their striking shape and orientation these pits have become known as swiss cheese features. In 2001 the craft photographed the same pits again and found that they had grown larger, retreating about 3 meters in one Martian year.[90] These features are caused by the sublimation of the dry ice layer, thereby exposing the inert water ice layer. More recent observations indicate that the ice at Mars' south pole is continuing to sublime.[91] The pits in the ice continue to grow by about 3 meters per Martian year. Malin states that conditions on Mars are not currently conducive to the formation of new ice. A NASA press release has suggested that this indicates a "climate change in progress"[92] on Mars. In a summary of observations with the Mars Orbiter Camera, researchers speculated that some dry ice may have been deposited between the Mariner 9 and the Mars Global Surveyor mission. Based on the current rate of loss, the deposits of today may be gone in a hundred years.[89]

Elsewhere on the planet, low latitude areas have more water ice than they should have given current climatic conditions.[93] Mars Odyssey "is giving us indications of recent global climate change in Mars," said Jeffrey Plaut, project scientist for the mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in non-peer reviewed published work in 2003.

The cause of these changes is still not 100% for certain, nor is it likely to be until more samples and readings are taken. To assert that there is no possible connection at all between changes on Mars and changes on Earth seems a bit premature.

Climate change. This does not restrict itself to heating, and it's the same situation on earth. The earth is not just cooling, nor is it just warming; the entire point is that things we used to take for granted are changing, and the push is to blame things curiously regulated by Governments for those changes.
 
Folks are confusing blow back with actual weather. What a coincidence.:rolleyes:

A more recent study by the Congressionally-funded US Institute for Peace confirmed a "basic causal mechanism" that "links climate change with violence in Nigeria."

Watch in awe as an empirical government that is $17(?) trillion in debt corrects the weather of a planet and brings peace to the human race.

Rick and Morty is more believable.
 
Did you even read those links? 2 of them straight up say why mars appears to be in menopause while showign it has nothing to do with our version of climate change.

Let me link you an actually scientific paper instead of articles that over generalize facts

http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/464/2094/1387.abstract

No they do not. One does. The other two say that they disagree with the theories presented. From the third link;

“Global warming on Neptune's moon Triton as well as Jupiter and Pluto, and now Mars has some [scientists] scratching their heads over what could possibly be in common with the warming of all these planets … Could there be something in common with all the planets in our solar system that might cause them all to warm at the same time?”

Well fucking howdy doody, I don't know. And then they go on to explain why this couldn't be so because it doesn't fit their agenda. Carry on with what's presented in your link Ranger, be my guest.

A multivariate fit to the variation in global mean surface air temperature anomaly over the past half century is presented. The fit procedure allows for the effect of response time on the waveform, amplitude and lag of each radiative forcing input, and each is allowed to have its own time constant. It is shown that the contribution of solar variability to the temperature trend since 1987 is small and downward; the best estimate is −1.3% and the 2σ confidence level sets the uncertainty range of −0.7 to −1.9%. The result is the same if one quantifies the solar variation using galactic cosmic ray fluxes (for which the analysis can be extended back to 1953) or the most accurate total solar irradiance data composite. The rise in the global mean air surface temperatures is predominantly associated with a linear increase that represents the combined effects of changes in anthropogenic well-mixed greenhouse gases and aerosols, although, in recent decades, there is also a considerable contribution by a relative lack of major volcanic eruptions. The best estimate is that the anthropogenic factors contribute 75% of the rise since 1987, with an uncertainty range (set by the 2σ confidence level using an AR(1) noise model) of 49–160%; thus, the uncertainty is large, but we can state that at least half of the temperature trend comes from the linear term and that this term could explain the entire rise. The results are consistent with the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) estimates of the changes in radiative forcing (given for 1961–1995) and are here combined with those estimates to find the response times, equilibrium climate sensitivities and pertinent heat capacities (i.e. the depth into the oceans to which a given radiative forcing variation penetrates) of the quasi-periodic (decadal-scale) input forcing variations. As shown by previous studies, the decadal-scale variations do not penetrate as deeply into the oceans as the longer term drifts and have shorter response times. Hence, conclusions about the response to century-scale forcing changes (and hence the associated equilibrium climate sensitivity and the temperature rise commitment) cannot be made from studies of the response to shorter period forcing changes.
 
Taxes might not yet be high enough to prevent another ice age!
Taxes cause the sun to slowly flicker in various cyclic patterns that range from brighter/hotter to dimmer/cooler over decades, centuries and millennium.
The changes in the sun's output can even be detected on planets other than Earth. e.g., ice caps on Mars.
The taxes must be raised to save the inner planets (including Earth) from climate change, or we're all gonna' die.
The debate is over.
Science has spoken.
Na nah na nan nah.
What, are you stupid?
The debate is over; science has spoken.
 
How much money do we give until we feel safe? ;)

This is a war on climate change mister! Somebody obviously hates the earth and the children.

Taxes might not yet be high enough to prevent another ice age!
Taxes cause the sun to slowly flicker in various cyclic patterns that range from brighter/hotter to dimmer/cooler over decades, centuries and millennium.
The changes in the sun's output can even be detected on planets other than Earth. e.g., ice caps on Mars.
The taxes must be raised to save the inner planets (including Earth) from climate change, or we're all gonna' die.
The debate is over.
Science has spoken.
Na nah na nan nah.
What, are you stupid?
The debate is over; science has spoken.

lol
 
Back
Top