Bob Barr shows leadership to unify liberty movement

no barr shows hackery and lost any chance of my vote or my money(which he's hit me up for twice and I considered to send some)
 
# Damon Talbot Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
September 10th, 2008 at 1:02 pm

Unify??

Is that why you skipped the Unification of 3rd Parties Event that was done by Ron Paul? How is that unifying? As to your offer to Ron Paul to be your V.P. Nominee that only shows you know not Ron Paul and his integrity and only wanted to illicit his Revolution. Your plan backfired. It has shown us that event when a great opertunity opens up, Ron Paul stands by his principles. Mr. Barr does not know Unity, He does not know Integrity, An he will not know have my vote.
Click to expand...
I wonder if they will respect freedom of speech and post it.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 2,627



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
# Damon Talbot Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
September 10th, 2008 at 1:02 pm

Unify??

Is that why you skipped the Unification of 3rd Parties Event that was done by Ron Paul? How is that unifying? As to your offer to Ron Paul to be your V.P. Nominee that only shows you know not Ron Paul and his integrity and only wanted to illicit his Revolution. Your plan backfired. It has shown us that event when a great opertunity opens up, Ron Paul stands by his principles. Mr. Barr does not know Unity, He does not know Integrity, An he will not know have my vote.

I wonder if they will respect freedom of speech and post it.



I wonder if Mr Talbot will learn how to spell.
 
steph3n said:
no barr shows hackery and lost any chance of my vote or my money(which he's hit me up for twice and I considered to send some)
Reply With Quote
Click to expand...

I agree!

If Barr was confident in himself and his message then he would have believed himself to be the greatest beneficiary of all of those candidates from the publicity. FURTHERMORE, the message of the press conference was (unless I'm missing something here) was that the two parties are a sham and that there are far better alternatives. Barr should certainly believe that this is true and enthusiastically joined in this public statement. He would have had so much to gain. This was a tremendous blunder by his campaign. Someone in his campaign said that he would not be showing "leadership" if he were to suggest simply voting for someone in the group on the stage. But in no way was there any message that there was not great differences between the candidates appearing with Dr. Paul. The differences between Baldwin and Barr vs. Mckinney and Nader are very large, indeed. And exciting and challenging differences worthy of public debate. It shows Barr's lack of character and confidence that he didn't view this opportunity as a wonderful one to showcase his platform!
 
re: Bob Barr

Given the fact that Bob Barr has been under constant fire for his shaky credentials as a libertarian, I'm astonished that he would openly challenge someone whose credentials are, comparatively, impeccable! Did he really think he wouldn't catch hell for this? Did he really think it would help solidify or expand his support?

It's hard to believe that he's really that foolish, but I guess it's true.

I understand the point that not all third party candidates are worth voting for. I agree. Nevertheless, Dr. Paul was doing his best to weaken the establishment by encouraging the American people to consider all of the alternatives, to inform themselves and think outside of the box! I won't vote for Nader, but at least a vote for Nader isn't a vote for McBama, and that is some degree of progress.

Barr has irreparably damaged his already struggling campaign.
 
Bartrolls Unite!

It's funny... we see the real individuals now, and the trolls have been exposed. Choose a side.
 
phoenix1861 said:
Given the fact that Bob Barr has been under constant fire for his shaky credentials as a libertarian, I'm astonished that he would openly challenge someone whose credentials are, comparatively, impeccable! Did he really think he wouldn't catch hell for this? Did he really think it would help solidify or expand his support?

It's hard to believe that he's really that foolish, but I guess it's true.

I understand the point that not all third party candidates are worth voting for. I agree. Nevertheless, Dr. Paul was doing his best to weaken the establishment by encouraging the American people to consider all of the alternatives, to inform themselves and think outside of the box! I won't vote for Nader, but at least a vote for Nader isn't a vote for McBama, and that is some degree of progress.

Barr has irreparably damaged his already struggling campaign.
Click to expand...

Sure isn't hard to see why people are calling him a shill and a plant. Either that or he's a complete blithering idiot. I don't see a third way.

Barr shows leadership to unite the liberty movement, all right--behind Chuck Baldwin!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brian4Liberty
Matt Walsh: Any country that can’t function without American aid has no right to exist.
2 3
Replies
48
Views
356
familydog
F
PAF
A Chance to Double Your Gift!
Replies
3
Views
2K
TheTexan
TheTexan
jmdrake
Barack Obama now more libertarian than Donald Trump
Replies
16
Views
248
familydog
F
jmdrake
Debunking the claim that Trump had to appoint William Barr to avoid impeachment
Replies
14
Views
1K
dannno
dannno
PAF
Dogecoin Bets Spike to $1.3B as Trump Popularity Sees DOGE Rocket 15%
Replies
0
Views
2K
PAF
PAF
Back
Top