Newt Gingrich Bob Barr: Libertarians should vote for Gingrich

[moostraks]

Bob Barr, the only rabid pro-drug war "libertarian" ever to exist

Don't forget he's anti-religious freedom as well....
http://www.religioustolerance.org/burn_aw2.htm

 

[89five.o]

I'm embarrassed that I voted for that guy.

 

[specsaregood]

I'm embarrassed that I voted for that guy.

i'm still happy with my baldwin vote.
maybe we should bump some of those old barr vs. baldwin threads...

 

[green73]

Example #96395 why the LP is a joke.

 

[PatriotOne]

As I have said since 2008.........Bob Barr has never been a Libertarian. He's CIA who pretends to be a libertarian. A CIA infiltrator in the party used to gather insider info and use his position to influence the party. ALWAYS HAS BEEN.

As usual, the "big elephant in the room" post gets ignored while people naively still think Bob Barr is just some confused libertarian. I guess I'll just have to +1776 my own post.

 

[Cabal]

Example #96395 why the LP is a joke.

True story.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Example #96395 why the LP is a joke.

+a bunch. Just another bought and paid for bunch nowadays. A tentacle of the Kochtopus too, IIRC.

 

[jmdrake]

Okay! All you Bob Barr supporters who attacked us Chuck Baldwin supporters in 2008 and called us "theocrats" time to fess up! I got something for you!

 

[Yieu]

Don't forget he's anti-religious freedom as well....
http://www.religioustolerance.org/burn_aw2.htm

Darn! And here the reason why I did not vote for Baldwin was because I thought he was anti-religious freedom as well (meaning, anti-all-but-his-own religion)... I thought Baldwin would give favor to one group and tyranny toward others, otherwise known as collectivism. Now we know that Barr would have done that.

I just wish they would not write any laws regarding religion, like the Constitution says. No laws giving favor toward a preferred group, no laws causing tyranny towards others. A strong and clear separation between church and state is what would allow people to bear their religious symbols as much as they want in public.

 

[Yieu]

Okay! All you Bob Barr supporters who attacked us Chuck Baldwin supporters in 2008 and called us "theocrats" time to fess up! I got something for you!

Phew... good thing I didn't attack anyone.

 

[moostraks]

As usual, the "big elephant in the room" post gets ignored while people naively still think Bob Barr is just some confused libertarian. I guess I'll just have to +1776 my own post.

I was going to agree with you but I had to start lessons with the children and got distracted!!!

 

[moostraks]

Okay! All you Bob Barr supporters who attacked us Chuck Baldwin supporters in 2008 and called us "theocrats" time to fess up! I got something for you!

LOL! Yep...

 

[moostraks]

Darn! And here the reason why I did not vote for Baldwin was because I thought he was anti-religious freedom as well (meaning, anti-all-but-his-own religion)... I thought Baldwin would give favor to one group and tyranny toward others, otherwise known as collectivism. Now we know that Barr would have done that.

I just wish they would not write any laws regarding religion, like the Constitution says. No laws giving favor toward a preferred group, no laws causing tyranny towards others. A strong and clear separation between church and state is what would allow people to bear their religious symbols as much as they want in public.

I felt Baldwin was the closest thing to RP and trusted he wouldn't go that route.

 

[Yieu]

I felt Baldwin was the closest thing to RP and trusted he wouldn't go that route.

You could very well have been right. I didn't get that impression at the time, but I hoped I was wrong.

 

[rambone]

As I have said since 2008.........Bob Barr has never been a Libertarian. He's CIA who pretends to be a libertarian. A CIA infiltrator in the party used to gather insider info and use his position to influence the party. ALWAYS HAS BEEN.

I agree. I don't know that he's CIA, but he's a neocon imposter for sure. He switched over to discredit the party and hijack the movement.

If the Libertarian Party ever gets big, expect plenty more Establishment phonies to come invade it.

 

[libertybrewcity]

dear god...

 

[ssjevot]

Just because Bob Barr sucks (and I think we all knew he sucked in 2008 as well) doesn't mean Chuck Baldwin isn't a theocrat (his party is most certainly theocratic).

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Barr's ass is still sore over RP dissing him in '08. Baby.

That's probably a good part of it.

And let's not forget that most neo-conservatives are libertines (although they do their best to fool social conservatives and fundamentalists). Barr fits that mold.

And what is the Libertarian Party going to do this year? Bring in another outsider and ignore the others in their "race".

 

[alucard13mmfmj]

Santorum attacks Ron Paul because he is a Libertarian and not a Republican. Does this mean that Newt is a Libertarian now as well? lololololzzzz. Watch out Newt! Santorum will be after you as well!

 

[Keith and stuff]

Barr is crazy. Gingrich has the worst fiscal policy of all of the Republican candidates. It is also worse than some of the Republicans that have dropped out like Huntsman and Perry.