Bloomberg: Police Officers Should Not Protect Americans Until Strict Gun Control Is Enacte

I see the facebook pics got posted. My daughter was over earlier and got on and I saw them. There are no words.
 
Mike "Mayor 4 Life" Bloombergs an arrogant little prick. Why doesnt he just own up to the fact there is no way to stop mass murderers from acquiring weapons, whether illegally or legally. Holmes passed every federal background check...because he had no criminal background. Holmes had no psychiatric history, or history as a terrorist. the worst offense on his book is a speeding ticket.

Schmuck Bloomberg is applying his "large sugary drink ban" logic on guns and it doesnt work. If people cant buy a large sized sugary drink, they simply buy more smaller ones. It's like the federal ban on 10 round magazines, people just buy smaller ones.

We as a society need to realize there is no way to prevent a crime like Holmes committed. NO WAY.
 
We as a society need to realize there is no way to prevent a crime like Holmes committed. NO WAY.

That's not true. It's no way to prevent such a crime by trying to outlaw the tools, that's for sure. But there's a lot that can be done with the person so they don't end up committing the crime.
 
Why I love Mr Denninger

http://www.market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=209124

And in that regard my response to Mayor Bloomberg is simple: DO IT.

Here's why. See, it wasn't all that long ago that citizens lacked the one thing that police officers and other civil authorities had -- a decent communications network that would "go anywhere."

This is no longer true. We almost all have cellphones with Twitter and other similar media -- even teens have these items nowdays.

And that's the great equalizer, because for every crook there are hundreds of law-abiding citizens and today it's trivially-easy for us to organize and defend ourselves and our communities.

So go ahead, Mr. Mayor, call your strike. Let all the cops walk off the job.

I dare you.

Because the day you do it, there will be nobody to enforce the law in NY that says you can't have -- or carry -- a gun. So guess what? All the law-abiding citizens will do exactly that. And those citizens can easily organize using a simple hashtag to call attention to anything bad going on. See, our phones all have GPSes in them, so when we tweet "Robbery at the jewelry store on 26th!" the position pops up on a map for anyone who sees it. And shortly thereafter two or three dozen armed citizens will appear out of nowhere and Mr. Robber has a problem, as he doesn't have enough guns and bullets, not to mention being cornered.

Then we just deliver the crooks we catch (and we would catch a lot of them) to the prosecutors. If they want to go on strike, we'll appoint some new ones. I bet the judges will still sit behind benches and book people into jail. Oh, if the cops that man the jail quit? What did you say the unemployment rate was in NY City again? I suspect there will be plenty of applicants to fill those vacated positions.

There's one exception to the citizens organizing and coming together to protect their community, of course. Those cops who walked out? And the Mayor himself? **** you all.
 
He thinks that only police officers wear BR or BP vests?

I guess he's never heard of Ol' Dirty Bastard. Surprising since the entire group is from NYC

In February 1999, he was arrested for driving without a license and for being a convicted felon wearing a bulletproof vest (the first person arrested for this infraction under a new California law).
 
Back
Top