Blackie Food for Whitey

[Anti Federalist]

I understand Clayton's concern, but for me, I honestly could not possibly care less about the "optics" of being denounced as a racist.

That is utterly meaningless to me.

And you misunderstand: yes, I have hatred toward people that directly threaten me or mine.

But I wish no particular group or individuals any harm baselessly, just on the basis of some generic and unspecified and unreasonable "hatred".

I do, however, without shame, put the interests and preservation of White Europeans and our nations and homelands, ahead of all others.

If those interests run counter to other tribalized groups and interests, well, too bad.

Or, to put it another way:

Chad Crowley @CCrowley100

Forced integration leads to nothing but conflict, for mankind is not a uniform mass but an order of distinct peoples, each carrying inherited marks that give rise to their ways of life.

From the first dawn of history, every civilization has been the flowering of a particular stock, whose inner character shaped its law, its art, and its understanding of the world. To recognize this is not to indulge in the bizarre contemporary notion of “prejudice” but to accept the most evident truth of human existence. Men are bound by loyalty to their own kind, a bond that begins with blood and extends outward through family, community, and nation.

The modern order has sought to cast suspicion upon this instinct, as though to prefer one’s own were nothing more than hatred of another. Yet the father who cherishes his child above all others is not guilty of malice. The patriot who loves his homeland above foreign lands is not animated by spite. Preference does not imply enmity. It is the acknowledgment that love and loyalty are not distributed equally, that there is a natural order of attachments, and that to deny this order is to sever man from his very foundations.

Conflict arises not from separation but from enforced proximity. When distinct peoples remain apart, they may regard one another without rancor, sometimes even with curiosity or respect. But when they are compelled to live under the same government, to share the same territory, and to bear one another’s habits in the small details of daily life, tension becomes inevitable. What begins as irritation grows into resentment, and resentment hardens into hostility. Distance preserves peace; proximity breeds antagonism.

No society that has attempted to bind disparate peoples under one roof has long remained stable. Trust withers, solidarity dissolves, and each group retreats into its own defenses. The louder the official proclamations of harmony, the more bitter the quarrels that follow. Even men of gentle temperament find themselves transformed, for the instinct to survive presses them into partisanship whether they will it or not.

Separation, therefore, is not a summons to strife but the only foundation of peace. A people left to itself will still know conflict, yet it will not suffer the ceaseless antagonism that arises when incompatible ways of life are crowded together. Nations apart may still exchange goods, share in learning, and converse across distance, but they cannot inhabit the same civic body without decay.

The present order condemns loyalty to one’s own as if it were hatred, yet it does not abolish hatred; it only redirects it. The system openly cultivates contempt for those who resist its demands, particularly those who remain rooted in soil and memory. The hostility poured upon them proves that hatred is not banished, only disguised, and used against the very people who affirm the oldest and most natural bonds.

What follows is clear. To live apart is to preserve the possibility of peace. To force peoples into unwanted nearness is to invite discord without end. The man who wishes to remain whole must seek the company of his own, not from malice toward others, but from fidelity to himself. This truth cannot be erased by decree, for it is written into life itself.

 

[jmdrake]

LS is like magic ;-)

Greens from a can? I guess in a pinch it would be ok. Can or fresh, try frying them up in olive oil and minced garlic

If the come out of a can that means they didn't come out of Kamala's bathtub.



I know she used to be fine and Willie Brown and Montel Williams probably told her they'd drink her bathwater but she wasn't supposed to take that literally.

 

[jmdrake]

I've been posting here long enough that folks should at least somewhat know my sense of humor. The thread title was sort of a dig for @Anti Federalist because of all of the hatred toward "invaders" and black people. So to lighten up the mood a little I thought I'd use a little color, so to speak, to talk about recipes among friends. @jmdrake knows [or should know] that I have the highest respect for him and that it was all in fun. Plus he said he was going to try my recipe which I hope he does because it's good And if he doesn't like it, maybe he can teach whitey how to make them even better

Yep. I took zero offense at a thread about "blackie food." It's like most black people don't take offense at the movie Tropic Thunder.





And turnabout is fair play. Druiski did "whiteface" at a NASCAR event.

 

[jmdrake]

White people food for blackies.

(I have made his Wellington recipe, that he was awarded a Michelin Star for. It is spectacular.)

I'll be honest. I've heard of it and seen it but never had beef Wellington. I'm not even sure where I would order it. Is there such a thing as a "British restaurant" in the U.S.? There's French, Italian, Brazilian, Mexican, Thai, Japanese, and even German where I live. But the bloody Brits? I guess when we ran them out they kept going.

 

[jmdrake]

I understand Clayton's concern, but for me, I honestly could not possibly care less about the "optics" of being denounced as a racist.

That is utterly meaningless to me.

And you misunderstand: yes, I have hatred toward people that directly threaten me or mine.

But I wish no particular group or individuals any harm baselessly, just on the basis of some generic and unspecified and unreasonable "hatred".

I do, however, without shame, put the interests and preservation of White Europeans and our nations and homelands, ahead of all others.

If those interests run counter to other tribalized groups and interests, well, too bad.

Every political assassin that I can think of who killed or tried to kill white people has been white. John Wilkes Booth, white. The guy who shot George Wallace? White. John Hinkley? White. Charlie Kirk's killer? White. JFK's killer? White. Okay, Bobby Kennedy's killer wasn't white but he sure as hell wasn't black. The guy who shot Steve Scalise? White. Both of Trump's would be assassins? White. Note that some of these assassins got up close and personal with handguns so not even the "White guys are better shots" argument holds. And yes, there are criminals in the black community who will rob and maybe kill you for your gold watch. And you might find yourself in the crossfire of one gangbanger trying to kill another. But most crime, including assassination, is intra-racial.

 

[jmdrake]

This is one of the few places on the Internet where you can read real facts and escape the Matrix programming on all the major social-media platforms, and is providing real-time information on what is actually going on with the Charlie Kirk assassination (including showing how false-Israel may be involved). Funny how, just in the middle of that, one of the forum participants has a random urge to make a thread with a title that, regardless of whether it's objectively racist or not (I have no opinion on that), will surely play as racist on any MSM outlet should the Left happen to take an interest in putting RPF up on blast as an example of "online hives of anti-govenrment racists who are fabricating anti-semitic conspiracy theories surrounding the Charlie Kirk shooting".

Let's not forget that RPF has already been officially targeted by the DOJ and is currently being rampaged by some faceless. abominable chatbot obviously emanating out of some appendage of the MIC. When Ron Paul was running in 2008, the political hitmen dug through the issues of the Freeman and tried to claim that Ron Paul was racist -- an utterly ridiculous claim which they could not substantiate at all. But the MSM still ran with it based on whatever stupid shit they could fabricate out of thin air. Why would we willingly sow the seeds for future political careers which might be planted or incubated right here on this forum, to be taken down with such a basic 4-move-checkmate by the opposition? It's literally idiotic.

Optics matter.

That horse left the barn a long time ago with @Anti Federalist's "Taking things from white people" talking about. It's odd that you're worried about what is clearly a joke thread as opposed to a thread pushing the "white replacement theory" which is the mainstay of the alt-right. TBH you're kind of derailing what is an otherwise good natured thread. @PAF felt the need to defend his position by bringing up AF who felt the need to defend his position with "Those people hate and threaten me and mine" which prompted me to point out the intra-racial nature of murder. I'm rather just share ethnic recipes.

 

[Anti Federalist]

But most crime, including assassination, is intra-racial.

That is correct, I never disputed that.

The vast majority of violent crime occurs within racial groups.

 

[ClaytonB]

I understand Clayton's concern, but for me, I honestly could not possibly care less about the "optics" of being denounced as a racist.

That is utterly meaningless to me.

So, there is no camaraderie here? I have spent countless hours writing original content of better quality than most blog slop you can find anywhere on the Internet, promoting liberty and the Gospel, the values of Ron Paul. I type every keystroke with my own two hands and my God-given brain. But you and the Boomer Crew want to reminisce about the time when you could say n---r and it didn't offend anybody except Hollywood leftists. Well, it isn't 1959 anymore and I have to live in this shithole that I inherited from the people who were free to speak their minds however they saw fit, and try to preserve whatever few scraps of freedom are left in this country in the hopes that my adult children will have a chance to put together enough resources to be able escape this shithole when the FEMA transports start rounding up the remaining last few of us...

Anyway, enjoy your self-serving nostalgia and screw the Team... that's the spirit that is going to defeat the people who just shot Charlie Kirk...

 

[Anti Federalist]

I'll be honest. I've heard of it and seen it but never had beef Wellington. I'm not even sure where I would order it. Is there such a thing as a "British restaurant" in the U.S.? There's French, Italian, Brazilian, Mexican, Thai, Japanese, and even German where I live. But the bloody Brits? I guess when we ran them out they kept going.

You'd have to hunt around for it.

While the origin is British, it has become, over time, a staple of any really good French restaurant.

Here it is headlining the menu at Le Bistro in Fort Lauderdale.

https://www.lebistrorestaurant.com/dine-in-menu

 

[Anti Federalist]

So, there is no camaraderie here? I have spent countless hours writing original content of better quality than most blog slop you can find anywhere on the Internet. I type every keystroke with my own two hands and my God-given brain. But you and the Boomer Crew want to reminisce about the time when you could say n---r and it didn't offend anybody except Hollywood leftists. Well, it isn't 1959 anymore and I have to live in this shithole that I inherited from the people who were free to speak their minds however they saw fit, and try to preserve whatever few scraps of freedom are left in this country in the hopes that my adult children will have a chance to put together enough resources to be able escape this shithole when the FEMA transports start rounding up the remaining last few of us...

Anyway, enjoy your self-serving nostalgia and screw the Team... that's the spirit that is going to defeat the people who just shot Charlie Kirk...

That's our camaraderie.

That is my concern as well.

The Queer Race Communists are, literally, gunning us down. They say they will do it en masse when they achieve sufficient power.

That is the model of every Marxist revolution since the Bolsheviks.

They mean it, they will kill us all if given the chance.

Worrying about "optics" when faced when faced with a threat like that is insane.

They will kill you (or me) for proclaiming "Christ is King" just as quickly, or even more quickly, than they would for me calling one of them a niqqer or faqqot or whatever.

 

[ClaytonB]

That's our camaraderie.

That is my concern as well.

The Queer Race Communists are, literally, gunning us down. They say they will do it en masse when they achieve sufficient power.

That is the model of every Marxist revolution since the Bolsheviks.

They mean it, they will kill us all if given the chance.

Worrying about "optics" when faced when faced with a threat like that is insane.

They will kill you (or me) for proclaiming "Christ is King" just as quickly, or even more quickly, than they would for me calling one of them a niqqer or faqqot or whatever.

OK, I get all that, but it's still beside the point. I'm not accusing anybody of being "racist", as if that word even has any meaning in 2025. What I'm pointing out is don't put ammo in the enemy's hands. It doesn't matter that they want to shoot us -- the fact that they had to resort to shooting Charlie Kirk is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of desperation. This game -- it's not a game, obviously -- will continue to play out by "the rules" of political discourse until there is running violence in the streets. There isn't running violence in the streets, not yet. We're not to the Bolshevik revolution yet. So you have to play by the rules unless you plan to literally just throw up the white flag and surrender. I'm not surrendering. As far as God's will determines, I am going to give these demons all the hell they are begging for, and more ... and that doesn't happen by throwing up a Confederate flag on the site banner and allowing the website to be caricatured to the world as a hive of racists. They are the racists. Don't give them free ammo. Or do whatever you want, as you all seem determined to do, and then you want to complain about the country going to hell in a handbasket, when your actions are precisely how the Left pulled this whole thing off to begin with!

And whether you like it or not, whether I like it or not, hell, whether the Left likes it or not, there is a forcing function descending upon this country. Call it Islam, call it Sharia Law, call it the judgment of God, call it whatever you want, but nobody is going to "win" on this political chessboard. The whole board is going to be flipped, that's prophecy (Ezekiel 7:14). You can keep fiddling on the Titanic if that's what you're determined to do, but the right thing to do is to start lowering the liferafts and start handing out lifejackets.

But don't bother with anything I say, I'm a proven crazy-person...

 

[Anti Federalist]

OK, I get all that, but it's still beside the point. I'm not accusing anybody of being "racist", as if that word even has any meaning in 2025. What I'm pointing out is don't put ammo in the enemy's hands. It doesn't matter that they want to shoot us -- the fact that they had to resort to shooting Charlie Kirk is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of desperation. This game -- it's not a game, obviously -- will continue to play out by "the rules" of political discourse until there is running violence in the streets. There isn't running violence in the streets, not yet. We're not to the Bolshevik revolution yet. So you have to play by the rules unless you plan to literally just throw up the white flag and surrender. I'm not surrendering. As far as God's will determines, I am going to give these demons all the hell they are begging for, and more ... and that doesn't happen by throwing up a Confederate flag on the site banner and allowing the website to be caricatured to the world as a hive of racists. They are the racists. Don't give them free ammo. Or do whatever you want, as you all seem determined to do, and then you want to complain about the country going to hell in a handbasket, when your actions are precisely how the Left pulled this whole thing off to begin with!

And whether you like it or not, whether I like it or not, hell, whether the Left likes it or not, there is a forcing function descending upon this country. Call it Islam, call it Sharia Law, call it the judgment of God, call it whatever you want, but nobody is going to "win" on this political chessboard. The whole board is going to be flipped, that's prophecy (Ezekiel 7:14). You can keep fiddling on the Titanic if that's what you're determined to do, but the right thing to do is to start lowering the liferafts and start handing out lifejackets.

But don't bother with anything I say, I'm a proven crazy-person...

Well, see, that's just it: I'm not interested in playing by the rules anymore.

It's their rules, and the House always wins under their rules.

I've had enough of these people, my patience is not worn thin, it is gone.

The same mob laughing in our faces about Charlie Kirk were the same people mocking and laughing at dead drowned girls in a flood, because they were White and they were from a Christian summer camp. That was only a couple months ago, and it's already been forgotten.

Just like this will be, and Iryna will be...and so on.

And just because I may disagree on a point you're making, does not mean I don't read and regard what you have to say.

Somebody accused me of "placing them on ignore" the other day. I don't ever do that and I try to consider each point people are trying to make.

 

[ClaytonB]

Well, see, that's just it: I'm not interested in playing by the rules anymore.

It's their rules, and the House always wins under their rules.

No, you're not understanding the game I am referring to. "They" -- the Left, globohomo, etc. -- don't actually control the Game, they just pretend to. It's a magic trick. And the Right falls for it every time. "They" don't make the rules. The rules come from On High, the On High, the Almighty himself. If you really want to understand what is happening in 2025, where the headlines are so ludicrous that they would not have been included even in a sci-fi comedy like Idiocracy because "too unrealistic, no society could ever become that stupid/insane", then you need to start looking UP and stop looking AROUND. Read the book of Job. The whole pattern is in there. The devil goes up to God, accuses us with our own sins (or just slander, in Job's case), then he uses those accusations to request weapons (allowances) from God with which to attack us. He then attacks us, and we blame our neighbors, and he reinvests the dividends, back up to the heavenly throne-room to make more accusations and stock up his ammo supply.

Last year, I was explaining to a friend who was struggling with alcohol that once the devil finds a way in, he will come back by that way over and over. The real reason these headlines are multiplying is because they work. They work to set us on edge. They work to turn our eyes away from God. They work to get us to despair. That is the ROOT CAUSE. It is in our own hearts, not in the masses themselves. I don't care about statistics, they mean nothing. I don't care about "patterns", they too mean nothing. The devil is playing with powers beyond human imagination. He is bound (Matt. 12:29), but he is playing by rules that go way beyond the daily tit-for-tat of human politics. The call to the church, the brotherhood of believers, is to take the gaze of Christ himself, to pierce through the lies and the deceptions and the demonic propaganda, and to see the world aright. You can't shoot the globalists away. All the nukes in the world cannot destroy Marxism, not because Marxism is so inevitable, but because Marxism does not emanate from the human mind, it emanates from Hell itself. Once you really understand this, then you will see that the war must be fought on the rules laid down by Jesus. "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, then my disciples would fight." (John 18:36) We fight a different way in order to hit the enemy where it hurts the most. Line up all the Marxists you can lay hands on, and shoot them all, the devil doesn't care. Or fill-in-the-blank for any of his other foot-soldiers, be they street criminals, gangstas, hoodlums, televangelists, mediums, you-name-it. These are all just branches of his department of war. You will never even make the tiniest dent in the kingdoms of this world via physical force. The demonic realm is absolutely bullet-proof. But it doesn't matter. The Gospel moves forward anyway because, as Paul said, "The weapons of our warfare are not carnal" (2 Cor. 10:4) and "we wrestle not against flesh and blood" (Eph. 6:12)

The ultimate purpose of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, of the stabbing of Iryna Zarutska, of the Texas flood which killed all those children, and on and on --- is to demoralize you. Again, read the book of Job. I cannot emphasize strongly enough to read the book of Job if you want to understand what is happening in our world today. The globohomo have literally sold their souls to Satan... and they have acquired the powers that come from that contract. And those powers are what they are deploying. And that is why your headlines are literally bleeding off the page since 2020 or even a bit earlier.

I know a lot of folks on here are veterans and my appeal is particularly to them -- the way to defeat the enemy is not to drink yourself to death on Jack in the basement. The way to defeat the enemy is to put on your dress uniform, assemble in the public square, and go out to face him, not with firearms, but with the weapons of God. These weapons, as Paul says, are mighty to the pulling down of strongholds. Strongholds far more powerful than Cheyenne Mountain... the very demonic strongholds which are broadcasting the signal that is literally driving the entire world mad right now. I'm reminded of that final scene in They Live, where Roddy Piper goes up to the roof to tear down the transmitter. That is a portrait of the real war. That's how to play the actual Game. Hit them where it actually hurts the absolute most. Strike the crown jewels. These are the actual rules which even "They" do not control. That transmitter is called in Scripture "this world", and it refers not to rocks and trees and streams, but to the henchmen of Satan who are the ones pulling all the strings behind the curtain. There is no human army which can ever touch the puppet-masters, and they know it. This is why they laugh and jeer and literally dance on our graves. They are absolutely untouchable... but by the power of God in the Gospel.

The gifts that God has given to every believer are put there for a specific purpose in that great war, Ephesians 2:10 ... "For we are [created] to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." --- IN ADVANCE. There is a battle-plan! That's the point! Not a vague, hand-wavey, "God has a plan for your life", no, God has a DETAILED, and SPECIFIC role that each brother is to play in the spiritual war that is descending upon us. It has been the same in every generation, but the urgency has never been greater than it is today, since the first century, since they were feeding the Christians to the lions. That's the point in history we are at right now. That's not rhetoric, that is where we are at.

 

[TheTexan]

thread pushing the "white replacement theory" which is the mainstay of the alt-right.

Are you referring to white replacement fact?

I am not aware of any white replacement theory

And yes British restaurants do exist but you do kind of have to seek them out. Last one I went to was in Broomfield Co. A++ restaurant

 

[jmdrake]

You'd have to hunt around for it.

While the origin is British, it has become, over time, a staple of any really good French restaurant.

Here it is headlining the menu at Le Bistro in Fort Lauderdale.

https://www.lebistrorestaurant.com/dine-in-menu

A French restaurant serving a dish named after the general who beat Napoleon. I guess to the French good food is good food. but I took a date to a French restaurant once and the food was good but it's the most expensive meal I've ever had and looking a the price for the beef Wellington I can see why. The"Pekin duck breast" (Peking Duck?) looks more like my budget. I used to love watching Julia Child as a child. Maybe I'll follow your YouTube and make it. And @PAF I do need to learn to cook greens from scratch. I've made them from scratch but I don't like it.

 

[PAF]

A French restaurant serving a dish named after the general who beat Napoleon. I guess to the French good food is good food. but I took a date to a French restaurant once and the food was good but it's the most expensive meal I've ever had and looking a the price for the beef Wellington I can see why. The"Pekin duck breast" (Peking Duck?) looks more like my budget. I used to love watching Julia Child as a child. Maybe I'll follow your YouTube and make it. And @PAF I do need to learn to cook greens from scratch. I've made them from scratch but I don't like it.

NYC turned into a shithole ever since they closed CBGB and started fining people for beeping horns, but all along 7th Ave. there is a restaurant that represents every country on earth which was a lot of fun to do.

Greens are both easy and hard to do, but once you dial-in on exactly how you like them, they are awesome. Friends and family make them but I can only tolerate 2 others recipes besides mine lol.

I don't care for duck because it's too greasy. But I do like lamb with Syrian bread [puffy flat bread] and pepper sauce. If you want a great recipe for pepper sauce [my own recipe] let me know, it goes great with burgers too

 

[jmdrake]

If you want a great recipe for pepper sauce [my own recipe] let me know, it goes great with burgers too

By all means. Never let a good recipe go to waste. The first thing I really learned to cook (besides breakfast food) was eggplant parmesaen from my aunt's Betty Crocker Cookbook. The online version looks a little different but still good.

Eggplant Parmesan

Bring a classic Italian restaurant dish into your home kitchen with this 20-minute recipe.

www.bettycrocker.com

Italian soul food!

 

[PAF]

By all means. Never let a good recipe go to waste.

Pepper Sauce:

1 jar mild pepper rings, drain only half of the juice and keep the other half.
1 large onion diced.
1 packet of dry Italian dressing mix.
1 cup extra virgin olive oil.
1/2 cup water.
Combine and mix, let sit for a while before using.

The first thing I really learned to cook (besides breakfast food) was eggplant parmesaen from my aunt's Betty Crocker Cookbook. The online version looks a little different but still good.

Eggplant Parmesan

Bring a classic Italian restaurant dish into your home kitchen with this 20-minute recipe.

www.bettycrocker.com

Oh no way! Cook books aren't allowed! Do you press the eggplant before using it? I use paper towels to dry them out which makes it firmer/meatier.

Italian soul food!

But ya still can't beat BBQ chicken from Mexico and Dominica either

 

[jmdrake]

Pepper Sauce:

1 jar mild pepper rings, drain only half of the juice and keep the other half.
1 large onion diced.
1 packet of dry Italian dressing mix.
1 cup extra virgin olive oil.
1/2 cup water.
Combine and mix, let sit for a while before using.

Sounds good! I'll have to try it.

Oh no way! Cook books aren't allowed! Do you press the eggplant before using it? I use paper towels to dry them out which makes it firmer/meatier.

Yep! I am a child of the 1970s. Cookbooks. Encyclopedias. (We had 3 sets and I read through all 3 multiple times). Dictionary. (The old folks said "If you don't know how to spell a word look it up in the dictionary. How do you look it up if you don't know the spelling? )( Roledex. Telephone book. Yellow pages.

As for pressing the eggplant, that's a good idea. I used to follow the recipe too the T which required soaking the eggplant in salt water, pouring the water off, then pressing it with paper towels. I got lazy and stopped doing all the steps but I probably need to go back to doing that.

But ya still can't beat BBQ chicken from Mexico and Dominica either

I've had Mexican chocolate sauce chicken ONCE and it's very good! I've never had Dominican though.

 

[PAF]

Sounds good! I'll have to try it.

Yep! I am a child of the 1970s. Cookbooks. Encyclopedias. (We had 3 sets and I read through all 3 multiple times). Dictionary. (The old folks said "If you don't know how to spell a word look it up in the dictionary. How do you look it up if you don't know the spelling? )( Roledex. Telephone book. Yellow pages.

As for pressing the eggplant, that's a good idea. I used to follow the recipe too the T which required soaking the eggplant in salt water, pouring the water off, then pressing it with paper towels. I got lazy and stopped doing all the steps but I probably need to go back to doing that.

That's crucial

I've had Mexican chocolate sauce chicken ONCE and it's very good! I've never had Dominican though.

There's a big difference between Dominican Republic and Dominica, Dominica being the most eastern island of the Caribbean where one side of the island is in the Atlantic