I wonder how effective the money bomb strategy really is... it definitely pulls in nice totals for a day, but what is lost? Between each one we seem to lose steam and people hold onto their money for it when they could give it earlier. Perhaps a shift in strategy is in order after this one. A more steady promotion of Dr Paul and his message and a more general overbearing urgency to the need to promote his message and donate to him that is continuous and not in these bursts. Promote the idea of breaking yesterday's donation record each day with a graph showing the day's donations and the previous two and perhaps on the same graph a quarterly total with the bigger number as well (with the daily $ on the left, quarterly $ on right).
Promote the wider message of the urgency of getting Paul the nomination and how with all these silly move-ups in the primaries we're being squeezed for time. I mean we've specifically told people to not donate yet and then people have to be reminded to donate on the right day and their are server load issues. Just get people to donate everything they can now and get them to promote the message as wide as possible. Can this work or is it a bad strategy shift? I don't know, but with this new strategy special days would still be promoted with a theme, but people wouldn't be encouraged to wait to donate, but to simply spread a themed message of support for Dr. Paul... perhaps foregoing a specific day even and each month having a donation theme to target different audiences for donation. Like anti-media one month, for the soldiers and veterans the next, and so on. Having a monthly graph if we did it that way. Just tossing out the idea of doing things a bit differently to see what you guys think. I don't like having to do double work to get them to pledge and then donate weeks later. Especially when they could have donated right then and there. Get people to donate more not on the allure of a donation ticker, but more on principle per se, that it's needed as much as possible as soon as possible.