The accepted notion is that gold would have to be revalued to an extraordinarily high level, but is that really the case? It would have to be -if- the same amount of nominal FRNs/FRNs denominated accounts existed during the gold revaluation. Seems to me that real Main St. money is actually being drained from the economy right now, not expanded. Families are spending any savings for daily life necessities and if/when the Trumpbux stop, we'll see just how few fiat dollars really are out there. It's not that many, really, that aren't tied up in various 401ks or under similar trust/custodial arrangements with banks. The same banks that are 75% physically closed, while hard currency is being withdrawn from circulation.
Wall St accounting entries are expanding hugely, yes, but those are merely ledger accounting entries between banks and can be deflated just as quickly as they were expanded, if not faster, if/when the Fed decides. Foreign held dollars are reportedly becoming scarce, which indicates a similar global draining of dollar liquidity and the associated moves by other countries to quickly get out of the dollar, which reportedly is starting now and looks to be reflected by the now-falling DX. A return to a gold-backing would not require a huge upward revaluation if most of the fiat FRNs have, in fact, been zero'ed out from the global economy and Main St. All that would be left is Wall St and the next President, who will be a Dem imo, will serve to cut that down. The WEF is calling it The Great Reset for a reason. I don't think they mean resetting upward but resetting downward.