Bill Kristol challenges Ron Paul to foreign policy debate!

[Student Of Paulism]

Man..i watched all of that and this guy really hates Ron with a passion. Even at the end here, he couldn't wait to get in one last comment about kicking him out of the party and saying he isnt a good person, etc. What a deceitful and bloodthirsty goblin this guy is too, proving outright what a lap dog he is for his beloved IL. Go there then if you love them so much. He is definitely one of the top players when it comes to everything wrong with the country. Im sure it was eating him alive having to take all those RP callers and defending him.

This man is one vile snake and pretty much what i consider sub-human at this point.

 

[Liberty74]

In a REAL DEBATE in exchange of ideas with no time limits and the ability to pose questions to each other, Kristol would get destroyed.

First question from Ron to Bill..."Where in the Constitution does it give the President the authority to rule the world?"

LMAO

 

[LibertyEagle]

I want to see Michael Scheuer vs. Bill Kristol tbh.

^^^ this

 

[PreDeadMan]

I second everyone contacting tom woods or michael scheuer to debate this negative nancy... i mean negative neocon =p

 

[vita3]

Why give Kristol any attention?

 

[Voluntary Man]

I would love this...provided it's a real debate, where they get to ask each other questions, and they have to answer. No townhall audience plants or moderators asking gotcha questions.

 

[trey4sports]

I hate to burst everyone's bubble but Scheur is not even on the same playing field as Tom Woods. Don't get me wrong Scheur is great but he's not nearly as good at debating these things as Tom Woods is. Even though FP is much more in Scheur's wheelhouse than Woods but I still think Tom is better equipped for a debate with darth vader.

 

[vita3]

After watching this excellent BBC production following Bill Kristol & many other neo-con's war cheerleaders around just before & during the Iraq war.. What in God's name is left to debate?

 

[revgen]

Any time spent having a debate with Kristol is time that could be spent on the campaign trail reaching out to voters.

 

[thehungarian]

I hate to burst everyone's bubble but Scheur is not even on the same playing field as Tom Woods. Don't get me wrong Scheur is great but he's not nearly as good at debating these things as Tom Woods is. Even though FP is much more in Scheur's wheelhouse than Woods but I still think Tom is better equipped for a debate with darth vader.

Woods v Kristol would be a blood bath. Oh, the humanity!

 

[Jovan Galtic]

Woods v Kristol would be a blood bath. Oh, the humanity!

That would be cruel...

 

[blamx8]

I think Newt and Kristol deserve being abandoned together on a desert island somewhere.

 

[Voluntary Man]

I think Newt and Kristol deserve being abandoned together on a desert island somewhere.

'Red Lagoon'

 

[milo10]

Not a good idea. Have someone like Robert Pape or Michael Scheuer debate him.

 

[axiomata]

Definitely no to Paul as a candidate. Definitely yes to Fein or Woods.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

Fein or Woods. Scheuer is too hawkish, Kristol would get him to concede too much. Doug Wead? Good lord people, he's good for interviews surrounding the campaign, but he doesn't have the chops to debate foreign policy.

 

[jkob]

lol I wouldn't be afraid of this loser. We're right, he's wrong; you can't lose that debate. Ron would benefit to get his views on foreign policy out there, I say do it!

 

[jcarcinogen]

If there isnt a crowd and a fair moderator this would be very smart because the National Review neoconservatives might be educated.

 

[Wolfgang Bohringer]

lol I wouldn't be afraid of this loser. We're right, he's wrong; you can't lose that debate. Ron would benefit to get his views on foreign policy out there, I say do it!

I tend to agree. Ron should have a standing invitation for all comers--be they candidates or their policy-givers such as Kristol.

Austrian economist Bob Murphy offered to donate nearly $100,000 to charity if Paul Krugman would debate him, but Krugman wouldn't bite.

This seems like the kind of grave error made by a big, lumbering, arrogant power that a guerilla campaign needs to seize upon.

And while we're doing debates between candidates and candidate-advisers, we should insist that the undercard for the Paul vs. Kristol bout be Scott Horton vs. Gingrich. What a hoot that would be seeing that fat dingbat womped up the side of the head by the 2 x 4s of of Scott's facts and logic.

 

[Wolfgang Bohringer]

Also, its fitting that there be debates between candidates and candidate-advisers. I recall Romney in the last campaign always saying that he had to ask his lawyers about when to do things such as go to war. So, better that Ron get to debate the decision makers rather than their spokes-puppets.