ShaneEnochs
Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2011
- Messages
- 4,298
What for? Kristol isn't running for president. He's below such an office.
Kristol isn't running for president is he? Why should HE debate paul 1:1 ?
I'm sure he doesn't have to hold the hand of any of the other candidates![]()
I challenge Mitt Romney to a debate. My challenge is just as reasonable as Bill Kristol's.
I'm certain that Scheuer would concede that awlaki could have been tried and convicted in absentia first and he would be just as dead.Scheuer vs. Kristol might be interesting, but Kristol would get him to concede some things Ron wouldn't concede. As an example, Scheuer praised the extrajudicial assassination of Awlaki. It wouldn't really be a debate between Ron's position and neo-conservatism.
I like that.An amusing way to decline this debate is to remind Kristol that he's not even eligible to vote (as he is refusing to sign the pledge required in Virginia to support the party's nominee no matter what).
I want to see Michael Scheuer vs. Bill Kristol tbh.
I emailed Tom Woods to suggest that he take on Kristol.
That's the same idea I had. Tom can match Kristol's smarminess and totally devastate him knowledge-wise.
Don't do this. It would be a circus