Bill Kristol challenges Ron Paul to foreign policy debate!

Yes - it is time to stop debating with the Puppets and start going for the Puppetmasters.
We should get debates going with Zbigniew, Kissinger, Rockefeller, & some Rothschild folk too.

It could be a Prime-Time PPV event. If they know whats best for them we can drum it up as Neo vs. Morpheus scene

But, that would require some humility and a change of heart bringing them over to the good guy side. These guys can either have a change of heart and we can help them save face or we can just treat them like Darth Vader.

But either way, debate should happen.



Bring them out of the shadows and expose them to the people. Let the people see who they are really voting for, see who all the puppets are really working for.
 
Last edited:
Bruce Fein, Tom Woods, or Michael Scheuer. It would be fantastic to watch such a debate. I'm more partial to Tom Woods or Bruce Fein doing it, but Scheuer adds the "I was head of the CIA Bin Laden unit" element to it.
 
If not RP then get Sheuer or Woods or whoever to do this. It is time to lay it out on the table and let the people make of it what they may. Liberty and peace always prevails. I hope Judge Napolitano invites Kristol on to discuss his issues with RP.
 
Kristol isn't running for president is he? Why should HE debate paul 1:1 ?

I'm sure he doesn't have to hold the hand of any of the other candidates ;)

I often hear from conservatives that they love Ron Paul on domestic/economic issues but they hate/fear his "isolationist" foreign policy. This is an opportunity to take that sentiment on, and crush the prevailing neocon philosophy.
 
Dr. Paul has had to deal with neocons like him for a long time, maybe this may be a good idea. Dr. Paul does his best when he is mono e mono I think he would own Billy boy!

Of course they would air it at 2:00 am when no one was watching.
It could be used as part of a campaign commercial =)
 
Do it, but after the primaries or after the election. Maybe it will be President Paul vs. Neocon nobody at that point!
 
My goodness, that would be fantastic. However, it would need to be stipulated that this would be a longer form, closer to Lincoln-Douglas style debate, where each answer could go up to 5 or even 10 minutes. See the Gingrich-Huntsman debate for a good example.

OMG. I was watching this grinning, obnoxious, Neocon this morning and I wanted to hurl my Cheerios! Thankfully there were some Ron Paul supporters calling in to defend Dr. Paul. It's very tempting to do a debate but would this take away from the actual campaign? I mean, this guy isn't running for office (THANK GOD). Not sure how I feel about it. Some voters might see it as another distraction.
 
How about we have The Judge go in for us :D

Great idea! Or Tom Motherfucking Woods!

Doug Casey would also be great.

Billy Krystol has that arrogant way about him with that little shitty grin that I can't stand. I think he would try to out-style RP since his substance is BS.
 
WARNING: THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS. Kristol's no push-over. He's the best propagandist the neo-conservatives have. His father invented neo-conservatism and he is a zealous talented advocate for it.
 
I see how Ron Paul couldn't do it because he's busy on the campaign trail and such to put aside a night to do a special debate. Also, if he does one special debate, many others will want special debates.

Seriously though, I'm all for accepting a challenge. It's the Barney Stinson inside of me. If I were Ron Paul, I'd do it. What is there to be afraid of? The truth is on our side.

With that said, who could go in our place? We'd either need somebody from the campaign or a well known endorsement.

Personally, I'd send Judge Andrew Napolitano. When he went up against O'Reilley, he did very well.

Michael Scheuer is another one as he endorsed Ron Paul and he was in the CIA.
 
Scheuer vs. Kristol might be interesting, but Kristol would get him to concede some things Ron wouldn't concede. As an example, Scheuer praised the extrajudicial assassination of Awlaki. It wouldn't really be a debate between Ron's position and neo-conservatism.
 
Back
Top