Biden nominates Ketanji Brown Jackson for SCOTUS

Your first example, 120 years, he was convicted of possession AND distribution, i can't find the case file to review but I bet there were multiple aggravating factors that contributed to the long sentence.

Sure.

"Continuous sexual abuse" in Arizona, which is 3 or more rapes against a child under 14, has a maximum sentence of 27 years if it's your first felony.

Again, he could have literally raped those children and had a lesser sentence.

Your second example, it was 120 MONTHS, not years

Cool.

Here's another one: https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...e-than-100-years-child-porn-charges/79166356/

Another one: https://tucson.com/news/local/crime...cle_1f26bc97-396b-522d-a407-8d564ff96dee.html

Another one: https://www.abc15.com/news/crime/ma...le-police-find-230k-child-porn-images-in-home

Another one: https://kyma.com/news/2019/05/09/yuma-man-receives-over-100-years-in-prison/

Your third example of the teen girl, she only received probation

And?

Your 4th example of the two teens, all charges were dismissed

And?
 
Sure.

"Continuous sexual abuse" in Arizona, which is 3 or more rapes against a child under 14, has a maximum sentence of 27 years if it's your first felony.

Again, he could have literally raped those children and had a lesser sentence.



Cool.

Here's another one: https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...e-than-100-years-child-porn-charges/79166356/

Another one: https://tucson.com/news/local/crime...cle_1f26bc97-396b-522d-a407-8d564ff96dee.html

Another one: https://www.abc15.com/news/crime/ma...le-police-find-230k-child-porn-images-in-home

Another one: https://kyma.com/news/2019/05/09/yuma-man-receives-over-100-years-in-prison/



And?



And?

All of those examples are in Arizona, apparently the state law says each count is served consecutively for these crimes, instead of the more common concurrently. If it was concurrently, the max time in prison would be 10 years. So it seems like your issue is with Arizona law only.

And? You shouldn't leave out important info that completely changes the context of your narrative.
 
All of those examples are in Arizona, apparently the state law says each count is served consecutively for these crimes, instead of the more common concurrently. If it was concurrently, the max time in prison would be 10 years.

And?


So it seems like your issue is with Arizona law only.

No.

https://reason.com/2017/04/14/florida-man-gets-100-years-for-possessin/

https://www.newschannel10.com/story/5498610/area-man-sentenced-to-over-100-years/


And? You shouldn't leave out important info that completely changes the context of your narrative.

It's doesn't.
 
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson Denies Connection to CRT. Her Past Says Otherwise

Under questioning from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, at her Supreme Court hearing, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson ran away from critical race theory as fast as possible. Her record says otherwise, however. The candidate’s past embrace of some of critical race theory’s leading proponents is concerning, and shows that she has so far gotten off easy during her hearing.

The judge’s interest in critical race theory began early. Her parents, Jackson said in a 2020 speech at the University of Michigan Law School, prominently kept a copy of “Faces at the Bottom of the Well,” a book by Derrick Bell, long recognized as the godfather of critical race theory.
...
In her exchange with Cruz, Jackson insisted that she had never studied critical race theory. “It wouldn’t be something that I would rely on if I was on the Supreme Court,” Jackson said to Cruz.

In 2015, however, Jackson said that she tries to convince her students that sentencing “melds together myriad types of law,” including “administrative law, constitutional law, critical race theory,” etc.

Jackson also has closer ties to critical race theory. When Cruz asked Jackson whether critical race theory was taught in schools, she responded, “I don’t think so. I believe it is an academic theory that is taught at the law school level.”

That is in itself a red herring. As we never tire of pointing out, even if critical race theory is not assigned to K-12 students, it is likely applied, such as, for example, when teachers and trainers force students to perform “anti-racism” trainings that separate them by race or ethnicity.
...
Jackson indeed serves on the board of an elite Washington, D.C., private school that teaches critical race theory, Georgetown Day School, and whose curriculum she has supported. She was quoted as saying in the 2019/2020 winter edition of the school’s magazine:

Since becoming part of the GDS community seven years ago, Patrick [her husband] and I have witnessed the transformative power of a rigorous progressive education that is dedicated to fostering critical thinking, independence, and social justice.

The school’s recommended readings include writings by two of critical race theory’s main scholars, Richard Delgado and Kimberle Crenshaw, and one of critical race theory’s main practitioners, Ibram X. Kendi.
...
Critical race theory is an ideology whose foundational idea is that racism in America is systemic, that our society is oppressive, that racial identity reigns supreme, and, more worryingly for a prospective justice, that government must pursue race-conscious policies.

This puts in context why, in the same Michigan speech, Jackson praised the “acclaimed investigative journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones” and “her provocative thesis that the America that was born in 1776 was not the perfect union that it purported to be.”

Hannah-Jones, the architect of the 1619 Project, is a fabulist whose revisionist attempt to change America’s origin story from 1776 to 1619, when African slaves first arrived on the English colonies, has been debunked by historians.
...
More: https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/03...es-connection-to-crt-her-past-says-otherwise/
 
Jason Whitlock reacts to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson not defining what a woman is



Jason Whitlock reacts to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson not defining what a woman is:

"She can't answer because the goal is to create chaos and disorder by dismantling truth."
 
What Brian said.

It was that interview that jogged my memory and prompted me to update the sig line.

Ironic that, in the book that is quoted from, ‘Questions sur les miracles’ Voltaire is using that statement to denounce the church.

He had no idea to what absurdities mankind could sink to.

Insisting that the earth is at the center of the universe or that the gibbering mental defective is, in fact, possessed by demons, is fairly mild compared to "the fat man in the dress with fake tits is a woman, and you must believe it to be so, under penalty of law".
 
Last edited:
It was that interview that jogged my memory and prompted me to update the sig line.

It's also ironic how few people understand the famous fable. People didn't know the emperor was walking around stark naked, and just keep quiet about it. They actually believed he was wearing clothes they couldn't see, because authoritay told them so.
 
Insisting that the earth is at the center of the universe or that the gibbering mental defective is, in fact, possessed by demons, is fairly mild compared to "the fat man in the dress with fake tits is a woman, and you must believe it to be so, under penalty of law".

And then there's the fact that the claim that the Earth is at the center of the solar system (or even the universe) is not even incorrect or wrong.

It's just a frame of reference.

Geocentrism fell out of favor, not because it is erroneous (it isn't), but because, compared to the heliocentric frame, the geocentric frame makes things much more complicated than they need to be just in order to achieve the same results. If, on the scale of the entire solar system, the geocentric model was more tractable than the heliocentric, geocentrism would still be preferred today (and in fact, it still is preferred in certain contexts, such as when calculating the orbital mechanics of near-Earth spaceflight, which would be unnecessarily complicated if worked out in a heliocentric frame.)

The absurd thing about Jackson's "I'm not a biologist" rejoinder is that she specifies the frame of reference from which she ostensibly thinks the question "what is a woman?" ought to be answered (namely, biology), while simultaneously and bizarrely pretending not to understand what such an answer would entail or imply (particularly regarding transsexuals). Whatever else it may be, asserting that "trans women are women" (or "trans men are men") while denying biology is at least not inconsistent - but apparently, Jackson is an intellectual coward who is trying to have her cake and eat it, too.
 
Last edited:
And then there's the fact that the claim that the Earth is at the center of the solar system (or even the universe) is not even incorrect or wrong.

Nah, it was just straight up wrong. You're imputing nuances on the theory that did not exist at the time. People assumed back then that the earth was relatively stationary compared to the the sun, and it was the sun that was making great movements to circle around the earth. This is objectively wrong no matter what frame of reference is chosen.
 
This is objectively wrong no matter what frame of reference is chosen.

No. It's dependent on the frame of reference.

Relative to itself as a frame of reference, the earth is stationary, and the sun moves around it.

Edit:

Consider the following physics problem that I found by searching for a good illustration of this point:

A slim rod OA of length R rotates with angular velocity ω in a clockwise direction in a plane around point O. There is an ant crawling along the rod from the point O to the point A with constant speed [FONT=MathJax_Math-italic]v[FONT=MathJax_Main]⃗ [/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]([/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Math-italic]t[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main])[/FONT]v→(t)[/FONT] (measured with regard to the rod). Determine the time dependent location of the ant in the laboratory reference frame. Assume its position at time t = 0 s was at the centre of the rod.
https://physicstasks.eu/384/an-ant-on-a-rod

Note how crucial the words "in the laboratory reference frame" are to the problem.

If the problem asked for a formula for the position of the ant in the reference frame of the Sun, it would be totally different. The chosen reference frame itself isn't objectively right or wrong.
 
Last edited:
Nah, it was just straight up wrong. You're imputing nuances on the theory that did not exist at the time. People assumed back then that the earth was relatively stationary compared to the the sun, and it was the sun that was making great movements to circle around the earth. This is objectively wrong no matter what frame of reference is chosen.

No.
 
Senate Confirmation Vote for SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ote-for-scotus-nominee-ketanji-brown-jackson/

ETHAN LETKEMAN 7 Apr 2022

The Senate is expected to confirm President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Jackson Brown on Thursday.

The confirmation vote is set to take place at around 1:45 P.M. Eastern.

Jackson will replace Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court and will fulfill Joe Biden’s promise of putting a black woman on the Supreme Court.

Three Senate Republicans have signaled they will vote to confirm Jackson to the Supreme Court, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), and Mitt Romney (R-UT).

Last June, Romney voted “no” on Jackson’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Collins notably joined with Senate Democrats and voted against President Donald Trump’s nominee, Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation, while Murkowski joined Collins and the Democrats in the cloture motion against Barrett.

All 50 Democrats have signaled they will vote to confirm Jackson.
 
i have one rule when voting (or not voting at all) in judicial elections: never vote for prosecutors.

this selection could have been much worse (see Kavanaugh's ruling about the gov't looking at naked pictures of your girlfriend). i'm not sure what all the angst is about here at RPF.
 
Back
Top