Bestest picture thread evaar! (The trilogy)

[shakey1]

 

[shakey1]

 

[Swordsmyth]

 

[Anti Globalist]

 

[Anti Globalist]

 

[Anti Globalist]

 

[timosman]

Let's program the peons not to be two-faced liars. We don't need competition.

 

[timosman]

 

[Occam's Banana]

Nearly 90%!? That's it?

Seven out of the remaining ten are just afraid they'll offend somebody if they told the truth.

This is why I don't put much stock in "studies" that depend on self-reporting (regardless of the subject) - some number of respondents are going to answer the way they think they are expected or "supposed" to answer. Also (among other things, such as lack of definitional rigor, unreproducibility, etc., etc.), you've got the problem of how the queries are worded or presented, which can have a strong influence on how they are answered - even when no rhetorical manipulation is intended by the interviewer or questionnaire author.

But in this particular case, the manipulation (at least in the reporting of the results) is obviously intentional - since only the willfully obtuse can pretend to be baffled as to how or why "most people are not interested in dating transgender people." And that ridiculously ham-fisted title gives away the game all by itself, since only the most obliviously idiotic and incompetent of psychologists would be unable to "figure out why hardly anyone wants to date a trans person." I mean, hell, even a freshman psych student could hand you a line about "how individuals experience the range of their choices as being delimited by prevailing social norms" or some such thing (and no doubt "woke" psychologists could and would give you a litany on the psychically harmful bigotries exhibited by the binarily cis-gendered).

"Can't Figure Out Why," my ass ...

 

[merkelstan]

who is adding 'ben garrison' to art he didn't create? don't spread that.

 

[merkelstan]

...Adolf Hinkler<br>
and the ascii version

 

[Origanalist]

who is adding 'ben garrison' to art he didn't create? don't spread that.

Say please.

 

[timosman]

This is why I don't put much stock in "studies" that depend on self-reporting (regardless of the subject) - some number of respondents are going to answer the way they think they are expected or "supposed" to answer. Also (among other things, such as lack of definitional rigor, unreproducibility, etc., etc.), you've got the problem of how the queries are worded or presented, which can have a strong influence on how they are answered - even when no rhetorical manipulation is intended by the interviewer or questionnaire author.

But in this particular case, the manipulation (at least in the reporting of the results) is obviously intentional - since only the willfully obtuse can pretend to be baffled as to how or why "most people are not interested in dating transgender people." And that ridiculously ham-fisted title gives away the game all by itself, since only the most obliviously idiotic and incompetent of psychologists would be unable to "figure out why hardly anyone wants to date a trans person." I mean, hell, even a freshman psych student could hand you a line about "how individuals experience the range of their choices as being delimited by prevailing social norms" or some such thing (and no doubt "woke" psychologists could and would give you a litany on the psychically harmful bigotries exhibited by the binarily cis-gendered).

"Can't Figure Out Why," my ass ...

Preference falsification - Private Truth, Public Lies - http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...rence-falsification-Private-Truth-Public-Lies

 

[Swordsmyth]

 

[Anti Globalist]

 

[Anti Globalist]

 

[Origanalist]

 

[timosman]

Trouble is, this is quite wide spread.

 

[Origanalist]

Trouble is, this is quite wide spread.

It's spread far and wide.

 

[timosman]

It's spread far and wide.

Is envy the problem? People try to hide it so hard.