Benton: 'Dr. Paul will not seek to be nominated from the floor.'

[walt]

Screw that. Nominate him anyway.

Finally you said something that makes sense and I agree with. *faints*

(Too bad you supported that Benton clown for 5 years.)

 

[walt]

And just like that, everything I've said about Benton this election cycle is proven to be true.

And everything I've said since 2007 has proven true. *yet again*

 

[walt]

Have yall considered that maybe Ron doesn't want to be nominated from the floor? I don't know either way, but I'm just saying, perhaps it's possible that Jesse is just doing what Ron wants? Something to think about seeing as Jesse works for Ron...


This is besides the fact that a nomination from the floor would not actually lead to an electoral victory.

Point of information: People have nominated candidates without their knowledge in the past. It does not mean they have to accept.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Finally you said something that makes sense and I agree with. *faints*

It's too bad I cannot say the same for you.

(Too bad you supported that Benton clown for 5 years.)

I am not unsupportive of him now, either. So sorry for you.

 

[jdmyprez_deo_vindice]

In the interest of clarity I will say that I am the one who banned Walt. The reason why is because of a wish for violent acts against others. While I am sure he was not serious (or at least hope he was not serious), threats or calls for violence towards others is an extreme violation of forum guidelines that can result in legal ramifications for the forums. Due to the fact that the offending user has a history of forum guidelines violations and considering the nature of the violation - I gave him a ban period of two years time.

 

[RickyJ]

In the interest of clarity I will say that I am the one who banned Walt. The reason why is because of a wish for violent acts against others. While I am sure he was not serious (or at least hope he was not serious), threats or calls for violence towards others is an extreme violation of forum guidelines that can result in legal ramifications for the forums. Due to the fact that the offending user has a history of forum guidelines violations and considering the nature of the violation - I gave him a ban period of two years time.

Don't know what he said, but can the forum really be held liable for what a poster says? Anyone could say anything at anytime, I highly doubt the forum can be held responsible for what independent posters post.

 

[LibertyEagle]

In the interest of clarity I will say that I am the one who banned Walt. The reason why is because of a wish for violent acts against others. While I am sure he was not serious (or at least hope he was not serious), threats or calls for violence towards others is an extreme violation of forum guidelines that can result in legal ramifications for the forums. Due to the fact that the offending user has a history of forum guidelines violations and considering the nature of the violation - I gave him a ban period of two years time.

 

[torchbearer]

don't talk about fight club

 

[torchbearer]

Don't know what he said, but can the forum really be held liable for what a poster says? Anyone could say anything at anytime, I highly doubt the forum can be held responsible for what independent posters post.

a forum is kinda like a magazine. if it is monitored and has editors- it can be held liable. if it is not moderated and has no editors- it can't be held liable.
this site is monitored and edited by mods. thus- it can be held liable, the same as a magazine.

 

[satchelmcqueen]

as always, until ron himself says this, i wont believe it. sorry but i didnt spend the last 6 years of my life and money i didnt have to just not try anymore. until the convention is over, i will fight for ron to be nominated.

 

[georgiaboy]

No need to seek us out, Ron. You've done enough of that over the years, and we've responded. We'll do the seeking now. You just stay rested and be patient for a little while longer.