Barney Frank and Ron Paul Team Up

tribute_13

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
839
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?blogid=14&entry_id=37977

Liberal Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and libertarian Rep. Ron Paul, the Texas Republican who made a fine show in the GOP presidential primaries last year, find common ground today on hemp farming:

Their new bill, "The Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2009 otherwise known as HR 1866, would remove restrictions on the cultivation of non-psychoactive industrial hemp. They claim nine other sponsors, nearly equally divided between the parties.

"It is unfortunate that the federal government has stood in the way of American farmers, including many who are struggling to make ends meet, from competing in the global industrial hemp market," said Paul, adding that some of the Founding Fathers who grew hemp themselves "would surely find that federal restrictions on farmers growing a safe and profitable crop on their own land are inconsistent with the constitutional guarantee of a limited, restrained federal government."

Eric Steenstra, president of the group "Vote Hemp" added that with all the recent discussion about Mexican drug wars, "it is surprising that the tragedy of American hemp farming hasn't come up as a no-brainer for reform," calling the plant "a versatile, environmentally-friendly crop that has not been grown here for over 50 years because of a politicized interpretation of the nation's drug laws by the Drug Enforcement Administration. President Obama should direct the DEA to stop confusing industrial hemp with its genetically distinct cousin, marijuana." He said jobs "would be created overnight, as there are numerous U.S. companies that now have no choice but to import hemp raw materials worth many millions of dollars per year."

According to Vote Hemp, U.S. companies that manufacture or sell products made with hemp "include Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps, a California company who manufactures the number-one-selling natural soap, and FlexForm Technologies, an Indiana company whose natural fiber materials are used in over two million cars on the road today. Hemp food manufacturers, such as French Meadow Bakery, Hempzels, Living Harvest, Nature's Path and Nutiva, now make their products from Canadian hemp. Although hemp now grows wild across the U.S., a vestige of centuries of hemp farming here, the hemp for these products must be imported. Hemp clothing is made around the world by well-known brands such as Patagonia, Bono's Edun and Giorgio Armani."

Under current drug policy, industrial hemp can be imported, but U.S. farmers are not allowed to grow it. "The DEA has taken the Controlled Substances Act's antiquated definition of marijuana out of context and used it as an excuse to ban industrial hemp farming," Steenstra said.

Interesting Article didn't know if someone else had posted it.
 
I don't get this at all - Paul hooking his name up to Franks in any way is political suicide in the long run, even if it is to get a bill passed on a topic that Paul believes in enough for a yes vote.
 
Last edited:
I don't get this at all - Paul hooking his name up to Franks in any way is political suicide in the long run, even if it is to get a bill passed on a topic that Paul believes in enough for a yes vote.

Thats why we love him.
 
Ok, bit more info. Seems that Frank introduced his own legalisation bill last year around the same time.

I can see this happening at some point though:

"Well guys, I might have helped sell out the nation's sovereignty and crash the global economy, but at least I helped legalise weed! Can I get the big cell now?"

Amusing quote from an article posted in July last year:

The federal government should stop interfering with people's "leisure" activities, including using marijuana, Rep. Barney Frank said Wednesday, unveiling a bill to remove federal criminal penalties for possessing the drug. "I don't think that it is the government's business to tell you how to spend your leisure time," Frank said, according to the Washington-based Examiner. "There are a lot of things people do that I don't do, and I think that they should be free to do them. There are things that I do that other people don't do, and I ought to be free to do them." While Frank is a senior Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee , he conceded that there is little chance of the bill becoming law anytime soon.

And now a year later, they're gouging out the economy and passing around legislation for mandatory service.
 
Last edited:
I don't get this at all - Paul hooking his name up to Franks in any way is political suicide in the long run, even if it is to get a bill passed on a topic that Paul believes in enough for a yes vote.

In a recent interview on CNN where Ron Paul advocated legalization of drugs, marijuana in particular, he made the point that a lot of politicians drink a lot of alcohol, a more dangerous drug, yet they are scared to vote for hemp due to political reasons.

The reason you just cited for Ron Paul to not be apart of this bill was a political reason.

It would be hypocritical for him to decide against doing this for political reasons.
 
There is a pretty big difference between playing politics, and actually working to do what's best for the nation, IMHO.
 
I wonder if Ron sometimes chills out firing up a joint, by his cool behaviour it might just be.
 
I wonder if Ron sometimes chills out firing up a joint, by his cool behaviour it might just be.

Absolutely not! The man is far too principled!

No telling what Carol puts in those chocolate chip cookies, though. After all, it wouldn't violate her principles, she's not a lawmaker!

As for teaming up with Barney Frank, well--don't become a mechanic or a politician if you're afraid to get your hands dirty to get something accomplished.
 
I don't get this at all - Paul hooking his name up to Franks in any way is political suicide in the long run, even if it is to get a bill passed on a topic that Paul believes in enough for a yes vote.

Maybe Dr. Paul ascribes to the axiom: Keep your friends close; and your enemies closer.
 
Setting aside which Democrat is involved, I've long thought the nation would be well served just by getting a handful of libertarians in office. We'd work with the Democrats on securing personal liberties and the Republicans on fiscal responsibility and states' rights.

Of course, I came up with that idea long, long ago when there was still a substantive difference between the parties (or, at least, when they pretended better). But I certainly don't blame Dr. Paul one bit for going where he has to go to get things done for us!
 

So much hate and labelling. He is openly gay, get over it. You discredit your message and drive people away with such language. Does his sexual preferences affect you directly in anyway? Him being communist should be enough reason to generally oppose him; but if he wants to work with us and Dr. Paul on select issues we agree on, then so be it. I for one don't care who or what is diddling whom.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So much hate and labelling. He is openly gay, get over it. You discredit your message and drive people away with such language. Him being communist should be enough reason to oppose him. Does his sexual preferences affect you directly in anyway? I for one don't care who or what is diddling whom.

Yes and no. I do care that he's diddling an executive--compensated with bonuses--of Freddie Mac. Just like I care that the Food 'Safety' Bill was introduced by the wife of a Monsanto honcho.

But as to the gender of the conflict of interest--yawn. Just as long as he doesn't lure me into a hotel room and drop his pants...
 
Just as long as he doesn't lure me into a hotel room and drop his pants...

:eek:well i stayed up to late last night, its almost noon, im drinking my first cup of coffee, and this is the picture i get in my head while waking up! DISGUSTING and im a girl
 
Back
Top